Guest guest Posted February 27, 2003 Report Share Posted February 27, 2003 A well known Indian correspondant M.J.Akbar says so. http://www.dawn.com/2003/02/27/op.htm#4 "(Aurangzeb, incidentally, for those who might consider this interesting, was a vegetarian, but this did not make him a sensible ruler.)" What is the historical source for this piece of info? After all Aurengazeb was by all accounts a fundemntalist Muslim ruler creating much bad memory with Indians. He was anything but eclectic in his attitudes and beliefs. To consider him a vegetarian strains credulity. Is it true? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.