Guest guest Posted June 30, 2003 Report Share Posted June 30, 2003 TRUE> Still even today South Indian Brahmin surname / suffixes like Shastri / Acharya denote a family tradition of learning. In contrast suffixes like Rao denote kayastization. Rajesh Kochhar %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% - "Prakash Rao" <raopakya <INDOLOGY> Friday, June 27, 2003 6:22 PM [Y-Indology] Re: Clarification of Hindu name | Shastri originally was a honorific title given to a person of a | priestly class who involved themselves in spiritual pursuits, yagnas, | teaching of vedic and other literature. In the old days, it was very | common for a son to carry on with such activiites after the father, | and thus carried with him the name Shastri. | | Over a period of time, however, with the advent of Islamic and | subsequently Western thoughts, this title has little to mean the | activities performed by the person. Today, youngsters have taken up | various other professions and no longer necessarily indulge in the | same activities. The name Shastri continues to be used as a family | name. | | | INDOLOGY, "Harry Spier" <harryspier@H...> | wrote: | > | > Dear list members, | > | > One of the editors of the KSTS series name is printed sometimes as | > Jagaddhara Zadoo Shastri and sometimes just as Jagaddara Zadoo. Is | > "Shastri" just an honorific title or would it be a family name? | Same | > question for another editor of the series Madhusudan Kaula Shastri. | > | > Many thanks, | > Harry Spier | > 371 Brickman Rd. | > Hurleyville, New York | > USA 12747 | > | > _______________ | > The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* | > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail | | | | | | indology | | | | Your use of is subject to | Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.