Guest guest Posted September 19, 2003 Report Share Posted September 19, 2003 In The Ritual of Battle, Hiltebeitel says that 'allegorical interpretations of the Bharata are popular in India', but I wonder where this tradition is to be found. I have only seen it developed in Sutkanthar's famous book. Is there one of the Sanskrit commentaries on the Bharata which has a particularly strong allegorical emphasis? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2003 Report Share Posted September 20, 2003 Refer Mahabharatatatparyanirnaya of Sri Madhvacharya. It should be downloadable from www.dvaita.org Regards Vishal INDOLOGY, Phillip Ernest <phillip.ernest@u...> wrote: > In The Ritual of Battle, Hiltebeitel says that 'allegorical interpretations of > the Bharata are popular in India', but I wonder where this tradition is to be > found. I have only seen it developed in Sutkanthar's famous book. Is there > one of the Sanskrit commentaries on the Bharata which has a particularly strong > allegorical emphasis? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2003 Report Share Posted October 1, 2003 INDOLOGY, Phillip Ernest <phillip.ernest@u...> wrote: >In The Ritual of Battle, Hiltebeitel says that >'allegorical interpretations of the Bharata are popular >in India', but I wonder where this tradition >is to be found. I have only seen it developed in >Sutkanthar's famous book. Is there one of the Sanskrit >commentaries on the Bharata which has a >particularly strong allegorical emphasis? Georg von Simson, The mythic background of the Mahabharata. Indol. Taur., 1984. 12: p. 191-223. Georg von Simson, Die zeitmythische Struktur des Mahabharata, i Bopp-Symposium 1992 der Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Reinhard Sternemann, Editor. 1992, Univesitatsverlag C. Winter: Heidelberg. p. 230-247. He writes about interpolation of gita in MBh.: http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9901&L=indology&P=R18704 BTW, Hiltebeitel writes about two Krishnas in the chariot. But prof. von Simson says that Arjuna-Krishna is a complementary pair, a continuation of Indra-Vishnu of the Rgveda. Indira Parthasarathy (was Prof. of Tamil in Delhi, Warsaw) in his collection of essays (tamil) mentions about J. Pryzulski's mention about viSNu name from dravidian. Looking for the exact citation of Pryzulski. ViSNu is tamil is mAl "the black one". Also, nAL- as in nALamalai/nallamalai means "black mountain" (consider naaLagiri in buddha legend). NaaraayaNa is in tamil nAraNan, possibly from nALaNan 'black god' (cf. kALi/kAri 'black goddess', kuLampu/kuram 'hoof'). Simson told that he is writing a long paper on VishNu, have to ask if it has come out. Regards, N. Ganesan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.