udaattet dhaatus in the PaaNinian dhaatupaaTha

[Guest guest]

Dear Members,

 

Can somebody explain me the purpose of making certain dhaatus

udaattet in the PaaNinian dhaatupaaTha ? Is there any reference to such

dhaatus in the commentary or elsewhere ?

 

Thanks.

Narayan Prasad

[Guest guest]

The udAtta+it category of dhAtus in the dhAtupATha needs to be

distinguished from the anudAtta+it and svarita+it dhAtus. The

latter two are subject to being classified as Atmanepadin by

P.1.3.12 and P.1.3.72. By being different from the latter two, the

udAtta+it dhAtus become parasmaipadin by zeSAt kartari parasmaipadam

(1.3.78).

 

Madhav Deshpande

 

INDOLOGY, "Narayan Prasad"

<prasad_cwprs> wrote:

> Dear Members,

>

> Can somebody explain me the purpose of making certain

dhaatus

> udaattet in the PaaNinian dhaatupaaTha ? Is there any reference to

such

> dhaatus in the commentary or elsewhere ?

>

> Thanks.

> Narayan Prasad

[Guest guest]

Thank you very much, sir, for reply to my query. The term udaattet

does not occur in the Siddhaanta Kaumudii. In this work, the author

declares a series of dhaatus parasmaipadin directly instead of

calling them udaattet as in KshiiratarangiNii.

 

Kind regards

Narayan Prasad

 

INDOLOGY, "deshpandem" <mmdesh@U...> wrote:

> The udAtta+it category of dhAtus in the dhAtupATha needs to be

> distinguished from the anudAtta+it and svarita+it dhAtus. The

> latter two are subject to being classified as Atmanepadin by

> P.1.3.12 and P.1.3.72. By being different from the latter two, the

> udAtta+it dhAtus become parasmaipadin by zeSAt kartari

parasmaipadam

> (1.3.78).

>

> Madhav Deshpande

>

> INDOLOGY, "Narayan Prasad"

> <prasad_cwprs> wrote:

> > Dear Members,

> >

> > Can somebody explain me the purpose of making certain

> dhaatus

> > udaattet in the PaaNinian dhaatupaaTha ? Is there any reference

to

> such

> > dhaatus in the commentary or elsewhere ?

> >

> > Thanks.

> > Narayan Prasad