Guest guest Posted September 6, 2004 Report Share Posted September 6, 2004 The word 'gupta' as a proper noun in India is ubiquitous. It is used as a name- chitra gupta, vishnu gupta, chandra gupta(maurya)or as a name of dynasty- the dynasty of guptas.... On the other hand, the modern name Gupta is being used a surname of Vaishyas. On searching the web for the etymology of this word, I found the following: HTTP://WWW.PLEXOFT.COM/SBF/G04.HTML THE COMMON FAMILY NAME GUPTA, INCIDENTALLY, SEEMS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT ETYMOLOGY. NOW HERE IS AN IRONY: ADLY WAS TRYING ALL DURING THIS CONVERSATION TO DERIVE LARGE CHUNKS OF THE HINDI VOCABULARY FROM ARABIC, BUT HE DIDN'T CLAIM GUPTA. AS IT HAPPENS, THE ANCIENT RELIGIOUS NAME FOR MEMPHIS (THE ONE IN EGYPT, NOT THE ENDURING ELVIS-WORSHIP CENTER IN TENNESSEE) WAS HA KA PTAH. IN THE SEVENTH CENTURY, THE CONQUERING ARABS CORRUPTED THIS TO AGUPTA, AND EVENTUALLY THE INITIAL A WAS ELIDED AS WELL. THE G WAS DEVOICED AGAIN ON ENTERING ENGLISH AND SOME OTHER EUROPEAN LANGUAGES, BECOMING OUR COPT[iC]. Hope the group can throw more light on this. kishore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2004 Report Share Posted September 8, 2004 IndiaArchaeology, "ymalaiya" <ymalaiya> wrote: The use of the last name Gupta by the members of the merchant community may be relatively new, perhaps last century or so. Many of the merchant communities in North and Western India used the term "Sah" (Sahu, Shah, Sha etc). Use of this term can found in 11- 12th cent sources (Sadhu in sanskrit), in some places it is still common. Yashwant IndiaArchaeology, "kishore mohan" <kishore_future> wrote: > The word 'gupta' as a proper noun in India is ubiquitous. It is used > as a name- chitra gupta, vishnu gupta, chandra gupta(maurya)or as a > name of dynasty- the dynasty of guptas.... > > On the other hand, the modern name Gupta is being used a surname of > Vaishyas. > > On searching the web for the etymology of this word, I found the > following: > > HTTP://WWW.PLEXOFT.COM/SBF/G04.HTML > > THE COMMON FAMILY NAME GUPTA, INCIDENTALLY, SEEMS TO HAVE A > DIFFERENT ETYMOLOGY. NOW HERE IS AN IRONY: ADLY WAS TRYING ALL > DURING THIS CONVERSATION TO DERIVE LARGE CHUNKS OF THE HINDI > VOCABULARY FROM ARABIC, BUT HE DIDN'T CLAIM GUPTA. AS IT HAPPENS, > THE ANCIENT RELIGIOUS NAME FOR MEMPHIS (THE ONE IN EGYPT, NOT THE > ENDURING ELVIS-WORSHIP CENTER IN TENNESSEE) WAS HA KA PTAH. IN THE > SEVENTH CENTURY, THE CONQUERING ARABS CORRUPTED THIS TO AGUPTA, AND > EVENTUALLY THE INITIAL A WAS ELIDED AS WELL. THE G WAS DEVOICED > AGAIN ON ENTERING ENGLISH AND SOME OTHER EUROPEAN LANGUAGES, > BECOMING OUR COPT[iC]. > > Hope the group can throw more light on this. > > kishore --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benguile Posted September 28, 2008 Report Share Posted September 28, 2008 have run across the buddhist group dhammaguptika, which i have broken down to dhamma -guptika, but have no real luck on guptika. one comment i found from a source of indeterminate reliability (possibly quite good? or not?) was that guptika means preserver, from the stem gupta. please anyone having any suggestions, let me know thank you, and best to all benguile@gmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kali_Upasaka Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Kautilya or Chanakya's original name was Vishnu Gupta. He was a Brahmin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.