[Y-Indology] Compounds with kRt

[Guest guest]

I dont see any reason why. Take the compound 'hantavya-pashu'.

 

Extend this furthur. brahmana-hantavya-pashu. Sounds valid.

 

Take another example, shilpi-nirmita-pratimA, gAnDIva-niHsRt-svanam . These are

also valid.

 

Chetan Pandey

 

 

Harry Spier <harryspier wrote:

 

Dear list members,

 

In Sanskrit the compound form xxxx-kRt is valid and common.

Is it valid to form a longer compound from such a form, for example

something like

xxxx-kRt-yyyyy or must kRt always be the last member to be a valid form.

 

Thanks,

Harry

 

 

Harry Spier

371 Brickman Rd.

Hurleyville, New York

USA 12747

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INDOLOGY/

 

INDOLOGY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

 

 

[Guest guest]

As per P.1.2.46 "kRt-taddhita-samAsAzca", a kRdanta is supposed to be a

prAtipadika and from P. 4.1.1-2 this prAtipadika can have a sup-vibhakti. Then

from P.2.1.4 "saha supA" there is a further room for a samAsa (compound).

 

--- Narayan Prasad

 

Harry Spier <harryspier wrote:

 

Dear list members,

 

In Sanskrit the compound form xxxx-kRt is valid and common.

Is it valid to form a longer compound from such a form, for example

something like

xxxx-kRt-yyyyy or must kRt always be the last member to be a valid form.

 

Thanks,

Harry

 

 

Harry Spier

371 Brickman Rd.

Hurleyville, New York

USA 12747

 

 

ALL-NEW Messenger - all new features - even more fun!