satchitananda-guru & Sri Ramakrishna

[Guest guest]

You are posting ok.<br><br>You are quoting from

Sri Ramakrishna - like people say Rinong kritwa

gritang pibet - leaving out the head and

tail.<br><br>When Sri Ramakrishna knew that no Guru is required why

did he took Dikshya formally? can you quote on

that?<br><br>Sorry to interrupt I dont wish to pick up argument as

it would not be proper to argue as only The Holy

Spirit knows to whom he will shower the blessings.

<br><br>But Remember Guru is Guru you cannot learn Calculas

without a teacher - Religious steppings towards tantra -

yoga - meditations are tougher than that.<br><br>It

would be better if we try tobe seekers and not self

made teachers or gurus to misguide others who may try

to find a guru.<br><br>with

regards<br><br>kumbhokona

[Guest guest]

Dear kumbhokona,<br><br>You have a peculiar name

but thanks for your bold statement.<br><br>I agree

with your statement.<br><br>I am reading about the

lives of the great Indian Sadhakas but till now i have

not come across anyone who did not take Dikshya from

a proper guru. Or claimed to be a self made

guru.<br><br>I shall be obliged if the sadhakas here can help me

suggesting some books on the subject.<br><br>with

regards.<br><br>nirbanam

[Guest guest]

Dear gypsyqueenb<br><br>Thank you for your post that you also agree that a Guru

is essential in the path of spiritualism.<br><br>With regards.<br><br>kumbhokona

[Guest guest]

Dear gypsyqueenb,<br><br>Nice to read your

intelligently designed post.<br><br>But for your information I

will never feel better till your Lord Satchidananda

makes me feel better.<br><br>It is with the grace of

God that I live and am fully secured till he holds my

hands.<br><br>Live in Light with Peace<br><br>kumbhokona