Guest guest Posted March 1, 2001 Report Share Posted March 1, 2001 The surest sign of a perfect and right Sadhna (Meditation) is that after sadhna, one must feel energised, blissful and peacful. If this is not attained, it indicates some serious fault in one's sadhna. Also some people do sadhna with enthusiam and soon they leave it in between or switch over to another one. Why this happens, and what precautions should be taken before starting our sadhna. Let us discuss this.<br><br>The basic difference between a man and an animal is that an animal is driven by instincts and body needs whereas man is driven mainly by his Manas (Mind) and partly by body needs. Mind is sythesised of Rajoguna, the quality of action of Mother Nature, hence it has "Activity" as its main quality. Our mind needs action and when exposed to any new idea, it concentrates on it with full devotion but as is its nature of Rajoguna, it can not remain on anything for long and gets bored ealsily.<br><br>When a new sadhaka starts his sadhna, he is in full spirits. His mind is ready to start action immediately without waiting to analyse the path and its obstacles. A new sadhaka starts the path of meditation with zeal and having in mind the stories of Vivekananada, Yogananda, Ramana Maharishis and likes. His mind is ready to jump to sadhna keepin siddhis or enlightement as his goal. But a new sadhaka forgets that mind can not be tamed so easily. <br><br>A sadhaka then exerts pressure on Mind, which concentrates on the path happily but gets bored soon and starts brooding over other thoughts. At this stage some sadhaka leave the sadhna while others force the mind to concentrate. This forcing of mind is very dangerious exercise. Mind reacts to this force and starts bringing a flood of othere thoughts and completely destroys the sadhana. Sadhaka feels himself fallen from the path and becomes dejected and sad.<br><br>To continue ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2001 Report Share Posted March 6, 2001 Hello silentsoul. In this post a week ago, you mentonned concentration and pressure on the mind.<br>I found this quote of a christian mystic, DeMello, on concentration and awareness and would like the opinion of the co sadhaks of the club.<br><br>".... What i am advocating here is not concentration. That's not important. Many meditative techniques inculcate concentration, but i am leery of that.<br>They involve violence and frequently they involve further programming and conditioning.<br>What i would advocate is awareness, which is not the same as concentration at all.<br>Concentration is a spotlight. You can be distracted from that, but when you're practicing awareness, you're never distracted.<br>Awareness is a floodlight. You're open to antything that comes within the scope of your consciousness. When awareness is turned on, there's nerver any distraction, because you're always aware of whatever happens to be.<br>Say i'm looking at those trees and i'm worrying. Am i distracted ? I am distracted only if i mean to concentrate on the trees. But if i'm aware that i'm worried, too, that isn't a distraction at all. Just be aware of where your attention goes...." <br><br>I always tried to concentrate very hard on the mantra, so the mind will hopefully shut up one day. I changed this into awareness now, which is more relaxing. What do you think ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2001 Report Share Posted March 7, 2001 Dear Morgitta,<br> what you meant by awareness is in fact what i meant by concentration without force only a differnce of words <br><br> It is true that forceable concentration may not prove fruitful for the beginners, awareness may do the trick. But for diving deep into the realm of our own self, we finally have to go for the spotlight, with all its drawbacks.<br>_____<br><br>Yes dear Arghyajyoti you have very wisely mentioned religion and spirituality. And you are again right when u say we should be spiritual than be religious.<br><br> Religions have a different set of morals whereas spirituality has a different set of morals and the later is certainly a more accepted and universal form of rules which can be followed by any one irrespective of his religious and social background.<br><br> what we are discussing here is in fact moral for the spirituality. I am sure you will further explore this and write something on this<br><br>love <br><br>silentsoul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.