Guest guest Posted March 31, 2001 Report Share Posted March 31, 2001 Back again with the conclusion...<br><br>The significant figures of all religions and spiritual practices as well as by the scientific geniuses that shaped our understanding of the world todate all tell us the same thing. They urge us to go within in order to know intimately what is without. The religious/spiritual figures talk about the chakra system and specialized, profound knowledge that is found at each of the seven major chakras. Those scientists don't yet have an articulatable understanding of the chakra system, so they tend speak of trusting one's instincts and intuitions and following the directions indicated. Both groups are saying that the step-by-step, building block approach that most people think of when they think of science or when they have a "show me" attitude to anything has limited usefulness and that there is another, better way of developing knowledge, a way that is more wholistic and involves taking a gestalt approach, studied a subject as a whole rather than as merely a sum of its parts.<br><br>There is endless arguing about which method is better. The argument is about which method is easier. Some people think it is much easier to use the step-by-step, building block approach because when entering the unknown it is safer to proceed slowly. They would argue, "How can you study a thing as a whole when you don't know what that thing is?'<br><br>The wholistic fraternity says, "What's the point of proceeding on a building block approach without first having a blueprint? The structure will simply fall down or otherwise overwhelm you." They say it is better to develop an overview, a gestalt first. They add that it is possible to have that overview if you spend the time to develop that ability. <br><br>You don't get to present a piano concert at Carnegie Hall by tapping out one note on a piano. You have to have years of intense practice, and have intense desire and have an innate talent before your skill and artistic levels are high enough to give that concert. So too with wholistic thinking. The purpose of meditation, hatha yoga, rigorous self-inquiry, rigorously following a moral/ethical code for decades is to eventually produce that ability to see things as a gestalt. If someone wants to call that "seeing God everywhere" let them. You can call that cosmic gestalt whatever you want. But first you have develop it. And that takes time and practice. <br><br>Then all of your questions will be answered. Hope this helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.