Guest guest Posted April 26, 2001 Report Share Posted April 26, 2001 cont.<br><br>Now to answer some of your questions.<br><br><<absolute truth is known as advaya jnana tattva - non dual conciousness>><br><br>isn't this quote of yours in line with the idea of removal of you and i ?<br><br><br>It is only in line with the idea of removal of the false sense of you and I as it relates to identifying ourselves as seperate from Krsna. Your conception of non-dual seems to deny the possiblity of spiritual diversity. This material plane is the plane of duality - if we think of material life and misidentification of ourselves with these bodies and minds as negative numbers - then dissolving this misconception will bring us to zero - but that is not the end. There is a world of positive numbers - the spiritual world.<br><br><<God is always in the super subjective plane >><br><<Krsna says that he always exist and we also always existed and will continue to do so as unique individuals>><br>from the above quotes, either krsna is not the god mentioned in the first quote or there is a difference in 'point of view' in both the statements. please clarify.<br><br>No contradiction here. Krsna is the supreme eternal amonst all eternals. Nityo nityanam cetanas cetananam. Krsna is god and his is a person, the Supreme person.<br><br>you said:<br>'Especially the use of principles of one approach CANNOT be used to contradict the principles of another when the ultimate goal achieved is same.'<br><br>Granted. But as I have stated in my previous reply - our goal is not the same.<br><br><<It is really the you and I that facilitates beauty and love>><br>agreed<br>but there are different approaches<br>either you go for beauty and love as the goal<br>which may be a digression for people wanting to go straight for the final goal which dissolves all the sense of you and i, the ultimate expression of love and beauty.<br><br>my reponse to this is, again, we disagree on the final goal. The ultimate expression of love and beauty is Krsna. All aspects of divinity are characterized by sat (eternity), chit (knowledge), and ananda (bliss) - but each one will exhibit these qualities in different degrees. The vaishnava perspective is that Bhagavan is the conception of reality that is full in ananda - love and beauty.<br><br>In regard to my familiarity to Advaita philosophy I have to admit that I am not well read. I follow the precepts of Lord Chaitanya and his followers and I gravitate toward devotional texts and interpretations of Vedic literature. I read Vedic literatures with the goal of improving my own bhajana. Bhakti requires an object of love and a vessel of that love (ashraya and vishaya). Non-devotional literatures that promote the advaita conception don't facilitate or enhance the development of my love for Krnsa, so I don't have much attraction for them. I know that you and others get great inspiration from them and that is good - but as I said before - we really have different goals in mind.<br><br>Your servant (and friend)<br>Audarya lila dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2001 Report Share Posted April 26, 2001 Shrimaan audarya lila dasa ji,<br>thanks for your detailed reply.<br>Some of the still unclear things that crop to mind immediately are ---<br><br>--<<God is always in the super subjective plane >><br><<Krsna says that he always exist and we also always existed and will continue to do so as unique individuals>><br>it is still not clear to me , how you have managed to reconcile both these statements of yours. Can you specify what you mean by 'super subjective plane'? may be that will clear any misunderstanding.<br><br>--as to your assertion that our goals are different, i beg to differ, but that cannot be argued upon and would not yield anything. <br><br>--<<my reponse to this is, again, we disagree on the final goal. The ultimate expression of love and beauty is Krsna. All aspects of divinity are characterized by sat (eternity), chit (knowledge), and ananda (bliss) - but each one will exhibit these qualities in different degrees. The vaishnava perspective is that Bhagavan is the conception of reality that is full in ananda - love and beauty.>><br><br>could you specify what is the final goal for a vaishnava in your eyes, this was not made clear in your post. Is it to maintain the seperateness with the supreme so as to enjoy satchitananda ?<br><br>yours truly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2001 Report Share Posted April 27, 2001 The terms I was taught are Sat----being,Chit------awareness,Ananda----bliss. Although similar sometimes slight differences in terminology shed new light on a subject. Yours in love and peace. Rob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.