Guest guest Posted August 1, 2001 Report Share Posted August 1, 2001 Dear Silentsoul_55<br>Thank you so much for your teaching. I am getting to know about Gita. In fact, I was introduced to know Ashtavakra and Janak by my Master Osho's book titled "Enlightenment. The only revolution." I get tremendous profits from this book, both from my Master Osho and from Ashtavakra. It is both of them teach me the path of "Witnessness" Recently after reading this book, I find myself getting more and more consciousness. I am easily centered and witness everything happening around me, to top it off, I am not easily getting affected by things happening around me.<br>By the way, I don't know what it means of "Sesh" when you state the sentence of what do u think Sesh? Would you please explain it to me? Thank you in advance.<br>Last but not least, with your substantial compassion, let my path of pilgrim even more smoothly.<br>Hari Aum Tat Sat<br>Anand Prabodh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2001 Report Share Posted August 1, 2001 Dear Anand, Pls _/\_ i am not teaching here but sharing my views...i am a common sadhaka..neither a guru nor enlightened. Sesh is my friend dksesh who is expert in Ashtavakra..so i was asking him to confirm my views <br><br>Dear buddha by Force looking after the universe i meant the consciousness who sustains the universe...as in AUM we consider God in four states of consciousness...physical world, astral world, causal world and beyond (turiya). God also denotes the creator, sustainer and destructor of the universe. In Hari Aum Hari stands for Vishnu who sustains, nourishes and runs the universe.<br><br>Hari Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2001 Report Share Posted August 1, 2001 Thank you Silentsoul, I'm new to this approach, and as you know in Buddhism we have no creator. Genesis according to the Buddha is "this is like this because that is like that" so therefore there is no begining or end, no creator or ceation, no being or non-being. Just interbeing.<br><br>I would like to say that I enjoy the dialoge in this club and hope that my being Buddhist doesn't offend anyone here. Furthermore I am not trying to convert in anyway, just share views. That is important for me to say because apostalizing is not practiced in Buddhism. Infact it is against the rules and regs. if you will.<br><br>PS--- my speling is just awful, if you hadn't noticed allready, so forgive me in advance. I would have said atroshish but I don't know how to spell it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2001 Report Share Posted August 1, 2001 Dear Silentsoul,<br><br>Namaskaram!<br><br>The way you describe tatua (philosophy) is as good as a Guru, however with all your humility you say you are neither a Guru nor a teacher but just a Sadhak. For the layman like me this is more than enough. I read carefully each and every word of your letter, as if I am getting knowledge from the very face of a Guru.<br>Let me supplement some more information. Janaka was the king of Midhila, therefore, Sita was otherwise called Maidhili. Ashtavakra, as I heard in my childhood, had eight (ashta)bends on his body. However, the wisdom that Ashtavakra Muni had, surpassed all his abnormality.<br>I am so much eager to know about Ashtavakra Geetha and look forward to the postings of Sri. D. Shesh.<br>Hari Om!<br>Devan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.