Guest guest Posted October 24, 2001 Report Share Posted October 24, 2001 Funny I feel reading your post friend.<br><br>You were hammering the whole group as you thought that post belongs to respected tatwamasi. Immediately you came to know that it is a quote from Zung Mi you are telling a different story.<br><br>It seems you were deliberately hammering? <br><br>sonjooz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2001 Report Share Posted October 24, 2001 Hmmm...what different story did I tell now?<br>You must be getting confused with all the jokes and stories floating around.<br><br>I still hold the same position. I still disagree with the ideas in that message.<br><br>Just because it came from Zung Mi does not change my opinion on it.<br>I will say it again: I was hammering the idea, and not any person, whether Tatwamasi or Zung.<br><br>And I will again 'hammer' it if you post it under a different name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2001 Report Share Posted October 24, 2001 Dear sonjooz, if 'hitting the nail on the head' is hammering, then I guess our brother is hammering. Well, Jesus was the son of a carpenter. Hammer the truth !<br><br>Let me suggest to you something, brother. Mutual respect is fine and dandy. But, stop this 'mutual admiration' <br><br>dasa Hari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2001 Report Share Posted October 24, 2001 I enjoyed your reply and the threat too.<br><br>Hope this is also the part of Karma.<br><br>sonjooz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2001 Report Share Posted October 24, 2001 when one calls another "brother" it is out of mutual respect and love and yes, even admiration. Between you and the non silent one--who are you to tell someone else how to act or live or what to believe? If someone wants to admire another, let them for goodness sakes, it has nothing to do with you. I am really beginning to tire of the both of you insisting your way is THE way and all other ways are not. Allowing each his own path is important to the individual growth of that one. I beleive in expressing opinions, but when i was young, i was also taught to preface those opinions with.....in my opinion......because my parents had enough foresight to see that nothing that was stated was truth written in stone, but instead young ideas being allowed to be spoken and young minds formulating their individual thoughts. It is my opinion, that i feel we should allow discussion that is pure in intent to our sadhna. Anything else, in my opinion, takes focus away from why we are here. in love, mirabai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2001 Report Share Posted October 24, 2001 Dear mirabai, I respect you and I salute you. You have lot of love in your heart for everyone here. That comes from your upbringing and your 'baptist' background. I want to thank you, mirabai. Your Krishna whom you Love so much helped me also in getting me 'situaated'. But the temple priest always tells me we should not praise humans or flatter them. We should only sing the praises of the Almighty. If you are steadfast in your sadhna, nobody can take you away from your focus. Only when you are confused, people can confuse you more. This happens when you switch faiths midstream. From baptism to hinduism and vice versa. You try confusing silentopposition. You cannot succeed. He believes what he says and says what he believes. He is firm like the rock of gibralter. As our brother omprem says, all these obstacles are also part of one's sadhnaa. Siletoppostion is testing your love and faith in Krishna, believe me. Just stick to your ground. Do not budge an inch. <br><br>dasa Hari! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2001 Report Share Posted October 24, 2001 Greetings,<br><br>It was not a 'threat', at least not in the usual connotation of the word.<br>It was in a lighter vein. In jest.<br><br>In this long-running discussion on karma, I am trying to understand whether the theory of karma can successfully explain and answer the burning questions that keep coming up in my mind.<br>Particularly, since the terrible events of Sep. 11.<br><br>However, I have felt that Karma and the ideas of destiny and fate are sadly inadequate to explain these events. Not just these events, but all events in human history.<br>The progress of human civilisation, alongwith all its successes and failures, cannot be explained by karma.<br>That is why I believe that materialism has the answer. Objective, scientific, materialism.<br>Not logic in the Greek philosohy or Descrates sense.<br>Not materialism in the 'enjoyment of worldy goods' sense-that is Hedonism<br><br>Scientific, objective materialism that seeks to explain man's interaction with nature and the process by which man's consciousness is shaped.<br>Hope I am not going off-topic here, but I felt this was relevant in the discussion of karma. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2001 Report Share Posted October 24, 2001 Greetings Mirabai,<br><br>I suggest you take a deep breath.<br>You seem to be getting defensive here.<br><br>We are no one to tell each other what to do.<br><br>However, I do believe that each of us would want to constantly re-examine our views and develop them.<br>I think that would be one of the reason most of us are here, at least I am. There may be others, who are here for other 'reasons', and I am not addressing them.<br><br>Please take a moment to reflect on the path you take in search of 'truth'.<br>I don't care whether the path is labelled 'idealism' or 'materialism' or any 'ism', as long as it explains things that happen around us, particularly the social sufferring, the injustice and the exploitation.<br><br>The soul cries, not for relief, but answers.<br>And, having found answers, for solutions.<br><br>That is my quest.<br><br>As for your comment about political dicussion here, I agree it is off-topic. However, it will come-up occassionally.<br>For example, someone just posted that fake letter from some Indian in Canada. That is a chain mail and had no content relevant for discussion.<br>Thus, occassionally an off-topic message does come in all discussion groups.<br>I am not, however, advocating off-topic discussions, just for the record Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.