Guest guest Posted October 27, 2001 Report Share Posted October 27, 2001 Dear silentopp,<br>Think that your approach to reality is going to be curbed as it falls quite out of the scope of this club, so henceforth please continue on e-mail if you will(never mind if you are more interested in a larger no. of people hearing you out at a time)<br>Anyway...<br>1)""WHO validates this personal understanding to be correct or without flaws?"<br>is it corrobration by a certain no. of people?<br>or is it a gut feeling ?<br>or something else..."<br>I would say empirical evidence.<br>Empirical evidence gathered over hundreds of years of human civilisation""<br>Empirical evidence is fine but is valid only upto today, not tomorrow.<br><br>2)""I think the ultimate test of a theory would be if it can explain the progress of human civilisation, which includes the progress of the productive forces, as well as thought (including religion, philosophy, arts and culture, etc.).<br>It is just that karma as a theory cannot explain any of this. ""<br>Karma is only a part of the whole theory, it would take deeper study and perception for the rest.<br><br>3)“”Why does greed arise?<br>It arises because of the *physical* conditions of private property in production.””<br>Here you are trying to elevate what is just a conducive condition to the level of a cause. The difference in our approaches is highlighted here. On deeper analysis, instead of an emotion formed out of habit, it(greed) appears more of a natural characteristic of a (non-) entity called ego which due to its non-existence in reality is always trying to lend itself credibility by means of attaching to itself a lot of things beginning with the body.<br>Obviously, such excercises by so many non-entities has to result in conflict ! The resolution of these conflicts according to the spiritual approach hence is realisation by all of the truth of the matter.<br>But please do go on and explain the resolution of the conflicts according to your views, may be we arrive at a common ground, though by different paths<br><br>4)”” See, that is what I meant by the first difficult step.<br>The first difficult step is to let go of the ideas that you have and to be ready and willing to hear-out a non-conventional idea.<br>Don't reject an idea just because you don't like its source, or its tone.””<br>Ditto !<br>What about something that is so unconventional that it can only be pointed at and not put into words. What really happens as soon as anybody lets go of all his past, all his conditioning?? The term “I” is nothing but a amalgamation of all the memories and past conditioning of that individual body. Come on, what happens on sincerely letting go of all this baggage of past conditioning?<br><br>5)”” But how can you use this love to alleviate the suffering of people….<br>… It is by changing the world in a way that the causes of evil are rooted out.””<br>From aeons of civilisation, sincere men of a better intellect such as yourself have been attempting exactly this by changing the world. One system with another, another with another and so on. To what effect? Any change that does not come from within all the units of the whole, only being implemented from above is thus futile. So in your attempt to bring about this change in society, do you intend to solely rely on your excellent capabilities or bring up the level of awareness of all; and for that each one has to realise the truth on his own which is all spirituality is all about.….personal .<br><br>contd.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2001 Report Share Posted October 28, 2001 Greetings,<br><br>Sorry for the delayed reply.<br>A couple of my other replies got shot down like US helicopters over Afghanistan <br>Hope this one makes thru......I'll try and keep it as dispassionate as possible.<br><br>"Empirical evidence is fine but is valid only upto today, not tomorrow."<br><br>Exactly !! That is why we must constantly re-examine and revise our beliefs.<br>Even in the realm of physical sciences, such as Chemistry and Astronomy, ideas are constanly being created and revised, behavioural sciences and social sciences definetely will be far behind.<br><br>"entity called ego which due to its non-existence in reality is always trying to lend itself credibility by means of attaching to itself a lot of things beginning with the body."<br><br>Ego as an idea, like every other idea, cannot exist without a material base. It originates from a material base (in this case private ownership of means of production) and then assumes a life of its own in such a way that it seems to indeed have a life of its own.<br>Since production is such a central part of human activity, it is inconceivable that the mode of ownership of the means of production will not shape human consciousness in any way.<br>Greed is a direct result of that private means of ownership.<br>Attempting to flush it out from the conscience of society at the spiritual level is futile because its basis lies in real conditions and not in the mind.<br><br>"But please do go on and explain the resolution of the conflicts according to your views, may be we arrive at a common ground, though by different paths."<br><br>See above.<br>However impossible it might seem at the present time, the solution lies in rooting out private ownership of means of production.<br>One single individual might be able to control his ego by using self-control and discipline, but for the society as a whole to root out greed, the material conditions must change.<br><br>"The term “I” is nothing but a amalgamation of all the memories and past conditioning of that individual body. Come on, what happens on sincerely letting go of all this baggage of past conditioning?"<br><br>Humility.....loss of memory <grin/><br><br>"One system with another, another with another and so on. To what effect?"<br><br>Trial and error.<br>Social sciences have not developed to a stage where we can use it like medicine....take this to cure poverty, take this to cure exploitation, etc.<br>Mankind must experiment by trial and error.<br>Throughout history, the social system does seem to improve.....from slavery to feudalism to the present day capitalism.<br>There is still a long way to go...a way, unfortunately, paved with difficulties and struggles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2001 Report Share Posted October 28, 2001 i hope you were trying to be funny, unfortunately, i didnt find it so. You do remind me of one who went against the topic of the club by the name of gypsy and she too continued to do this even when asked nicely to stick to the topics at hand. She was an instigator. By your opening comments, it seems you are too. Such a shame We have some great posts on karma, on siddhas, on sadhana....i would be interested to hear your experiences in these things. in love, mirabai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2001 Report Share Posted October 29, 2001 Greetings Mirabai,<br><br>I don't know which part in the message you found funny (or thought I was trying to be funny).<br>It was written with perfectly serious intentions <br><br>"You do remind me of one who went against the topic of the club by the name of gypsy and she too continued to do this even when asked nicely to stick to the topics at hand."<br><br>I don't know who you are referring to. I haven't seen any posts from anyone called Gypsy. Maybe that was before my time (I've been here on this club only a few days).<br><br>"By your opening comments, it seems you are too. Such a shame We have some great posts on karma, on siddhas, on sadhana....i would be interested to hear your experiences in these things."<br><br>I would love to share my experiences....however, I fear my views and my deductions from my experiences might go against the boilerplate views here.<br>Actually my other post about karma of a nation is related with this.<br>I am trying to determine whether the theory of karma has the solution that can alleviate the suffering of the peoples of 'backward' countries.<br>Can it reform the consciousness of one single individual, and then the consciousness of an entire nation?<br>I know that both of these are popular-we have seen it in action during recent history.<br>In our own country India, you can see the former in action with Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and how he underwent a sea change while in South Africa and formulated the ideology of non-violent non-cooperation form of social activity.<br>Then the same consciousness got extrapolated to the entire nation and they fought to drive the British out.<br>What I am trying to figure is whether that was essentially karma at work or does the basis lie in the material conditions during that time, which created the consciousness.<br>Right now I am leaning towards the second explanation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2001 Report Share Posted October 29, 2001 The problem is you are perceiving a glasswith half its volume of water and wondering this glass is half empty and wondering where did the rest of the water go. For a moment please ponder the posibility/situation of half full glass. The next thing you will say is where did this water come from. <br><br>Thats all it makes as a difefrence.<br><br>- Seshadri. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2001 Report Share Posted October 29, 2001 Well dksesh, i am glad you will not allow yourself to be a victim. Thre are no victims with respect to the eternal. There is a difference between pain and suffering. When you reach a new level of consciousness you will of course feel pain, but you do not suffer. You can transend that part of the physical illusion. <br><br>Carl Jung once joked that we should all kick a blind man whenever we see one. He askes, "Why should we be kinder than God!" <br><br>wink*<br><br>ol' sarge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2001 Report Share Posted October 29, 2001 At the end of the day, its just a matter of perception. If u think its pain, then it is so. If you think its pleasure, then it is pleasure.<br><br>These things are intrepreted by the mind alonh with a lot of subtle attributes. Its the removal of these attributes, that seperates it from the emotion and so from the involvement.<br><<<br>When you reach a new level of consciousness you will of course feel pain, but you do not suffer. <br>>> this makes sense at that time.<br><br>We are echoing the same stuff.<br><br><<<br>Carl Jung once joked that we should all kick a blind man whenever we see one. He askes, "Why should we be kinder than God!" <br>>><br>If we are under the impression that we are different, then we will do all kind of crazy things.<br><br>If <<He askes, "Why should we be kinder than God!">> is followed, then the person/society becomes like the Taliban and the karma for it follows it. <br><br>- Seshadri. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2001 Report Share Posted October 29, 2001 "At the end of the day, its just a matter of perception. If u think its pain, then it is so. If you think its pleasure, then it is pleasure."<br><br>And your perceptions (which are a part of your consciousness) are shaped by the material conditions in which you live. That is the role you play in society's mode of production and distribution.<br>Thus your perception is slave to your being (or your material existence).<br>There is no way to separate the being from the consciousness, or the idea from its material conditioning.<br>The only way you can change your perceptions (and hence your consciousness) is by changing your material conditions.<br>For society as a whole, the consciousness can be changed only by changing the mode of production.<br>If society is to master and controls its group karma, it must change the conditions of its existence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2001 Report Share Posted October 29, 2001 You need practice. My suggestion is that please practice Patanjali's sutras. <br>I can point you to certain meditation institutes if necessary. You are not able to comprehend what I am saying.<br><br>- Seshadri. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2001 Report Share Posted October 29, 2001 Blessed Self, silentopposition<br><br>You say, "The only way you can change your perceptions (and hence your consciousness) is by changing your material conditions." <br><br>That idea is not true. You change your perceptions by changing your internal conditions or your consciousness. Patanjali's Raja or Ashtanga Yoga is one way to do this. You change your perceptions by changing your perspective, by seeking the wisdom of the chakras. <br><br>It is not just those 'material conditions' of the current life that shape your perceptions. It is also the material conditions of past lives and your resulting personality. Change the personality, change the subconscious issues and the perceptions change. And you magically find that you are living in a new world.<br><br>omprem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2001 Report Share Posted October 29, 2001 Some would say, without the individual, there would be no society. I am of the belief, that there are not even individuals. There is no "we", "i", "me", "us".....all is divine One cannot look at karma as a history of....these are two totally different levels of understanding.<br>The choices that are put into action from an "individual" set forth an entire liteny of events. Thousands of these events, thousands of choices make up the society. It is unfathomable to even understand how many choices, actions, etc must need to be made by an untold number of people for society to be affected by karma. I think one needs to focus in on onesself before setting out to blame society for the ills of the world. In fact, there are NO ills...all is as it should be. in love, mirabai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2001 Report Share Posted October 29, 2001 ""And your perceptions (which are a part of your consciousness) are shaped by the material conditions in which you live.""<br>You do not have to go far in rural India to find people who are apparently in a bad way materially but far more satisfied and happier than their rich counterparts in the west.<br>Rather than the material conditions shaping consciousness, it would be a person's reaction to them or his desires that do.<br>As Seshadri said, a half glass of water is a source of pain to many a rich owing to the percieved emptiness, but the same glass is counted as a blessing among many who are glad that it isn't empty.<br>Whatever be the material conditions(an oft repeated phrase in your arguments!), it is man's true nature to rise above them and realise the unimportance of them just as a kid does for his toys upon growing up. What then is the further source of attraction above this material world ?<br>For that, friend, spirituality may have some answers.<br>regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.