Guest guest Posted December 15, 2002 Report Share Posted December 15, 2002 Dear Tatwamasi, Thank you for your comments over "Christmas 1 and 2" and for your gracious welcome offered to me, though I was not absent from the group's link and was observing "SILENCE". One day I got a mail mentioning something about "protecting" Hindu women and "Frozen Hindu" terms and I concluded that there might have been some discussion going on. Just to put an end to any controversies whatsoever might have been, I quoted "Let us agree to disagree". I am on your side when you say about "Collective" effort for some "Noble" cause. The tragedy is that parameters of what is "Noble" have personal bearing and human instincts for collective action depends upon the "common threats and common interests". All prevailing world religions have emerged because of impersonal compassion of some "One" leader/thinker/master e.g. Christ, Buddha, Mohammad and so on; but in due course the teachings, by being interpreted in the personal perspective, have led to what we now call "Fundamentalism". Thus in my humble opinion, it is a lot better to stress upon the "individual" enlightening and just keep sharing and caring by propagating unselfish unconditional love and to worship our individual concept of the "Divine" in everyone and everywhere. But it doesn't mean that I oppose any collective endeavor for the works like the manager/co-ordinaters of "Saadhnaa" group. I am wholeheartedly with you all. "Hukum karoo jiii…." With Love Satish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.