Guest guest Posted November 7, 2003 Report Share Posted November 7, 2003 "Post 5432 >Why Krishna arranged brutal killing of Kamnsa, Jarasandha, 101 Kauravas, Karan, jayadratha,Dronacharya and million others." One thing we must remember is that whosoever confronted KRISHNA just before their death, whether on the battlefield of Kurukshetra or elsewhere, was immediately given salvation by becoming one with Him. But we have no such power or authority to give immediate salvation to others. Therefore please let us not justify our actions taking shelter under Krishna's doings (Lilas). Krishna Lilas and our actions are totally different and there is no parallel between the two. This idea of last thought just before death is also confirmed by the Lord in the Gita, that it is the last thought of the person that determines his or her next birth. If we have Krishna in the mind before death we are sure to go back to Him, but to achieve this goal we have to practice to think of Krishna Lilas and recite the name of the Lord for the remainder of our life time. To fight evil with violence is only one of the means but there may be other ways to fight the menace. In the spiritual Sadhana violence has no place either by body, speech, or mind. Here I like to interject another topic related to violence. At the time of the last Muslim Id, someone posted a message justifying the bleeding of animals to death by slitting their throat and this was allowed to circulate among the members. It was unfortunate that such a posting should be allowed to appear in this group because any form of violence goes against the practice of spiritual Sadhana. I request the moderators that they make sure that such postings are not allowed to appear in this group. Coming to the topic of charity, there are a thousand and one charities out there and one has the freedom to donate to those of one's choice. If one feels that a certain cause does not conform to one's ideals or one feels uncomfortable donating, one has the freedom of choice. At the Vaivharic level i.e. day to day transactions we do what we have to do so long as we make a gradual progress towards our spiritual objectives by purifying our actions and thoughts and do not lose sight of the goal. Eventually we have to try to see God in every thing and being. Salvation or the freedom from the cycles of birth and death is the ultimate goal of any spiritual Sadhana. Hari Om radhakutir ****************************************************************************** Know the Lord to be the only real thing in the midst of things unreal. Remember God.Take His name always. Meditate upon Him. Feel His presence everywhere. Surrender yourself to Him. He will bless you with peace, bliss, plenty, prosperity and immortality. ----Swami Sivananda ******************************************************************************** Please visit our Website on Vedanta: http://www.geocities.com/radhakutir ******************************************************************************** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2003 Report Share Posted November 7, 2003 Wow it is such a lively group. I have read some of the last posts and tried to find out the subject of discussion. Please allow me to participate in the discussion by presenting my views, which may not be quite upto the mark but still relevant. First of all I am thankful to member Sardarajitsigh ji for asking such question which would give immense delight to any as his questions have given us a chance to express our views on certain subjects which were perhaps earlier not looked into. Please accept my humble Pranama Ajit singh ji. Now I will try to give my views to your questions ===> Dowry deaths : It is certainly a bad mark on Indian community but blaming Hindusim for dowry related crimes is not right. If you look at the last crime figures of Indian Police, you will find equal percentage of Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims and even christians were involved in dowery cases. In south of India these type of cases are not heard. Dowry problem is not a problem of Hinduism, but of Northern and Western India. It is a social evil and we must join together to eradicate this. ===> Untouchability: Again this is a social evil, not a problem of Hindu religion. The main and authenticated books on which Hinduism (Sanatan Dharma) is based are Vedas, Upanishdas and finally Geeta which is a condensed version of Vedas and Upanishdas. There are thousands of other books, puranas, smiritis etc. But they do not necessarily present the views of Sanatan Dharma. Caste system is depicted in Manu-smiriti, a sort of verbal rememberance by Manu, the Man who started new civilisation after Pralaya (by water). Now thousands of years ago, one person re-arranged the society purely on his memories from the last culture, may be faulty. Hinduism has nothing to do with it, as none of the vedas, upanishdas mention a word about caste system. Bhagwan Shri Krishna, in Gita has rejected Caste system. This social evil must be eradicated but Sanatam Dharma should not be blamed for it. It is like blaming all muslims for 9/11. ===> Sati Prathha: This also has no mention in Vedas and Upanishadas. But from the time of Rama till date we find some cases of women dying on the pyre of dead husband. Today it has a legal ban in India and still sanatam Dharma, which is very old and has been tainted black by these type of social evils, should not really be blamed for this. Women in general have high respect in Sanatan Dharma, and they are treated as a shadow of Adi-Shakthi. In Tantra women are said to have extra powers over men( As per Tantra women possess extra half kalaa called Matri-kalaa which men dont possess). The main cause of two great wars (Ram-Ravana & Mahabharata) were only to save the dignity of the women. ===> Charity : charity is an inseparable part of Hinduism. side by side Hinduism tells us to be brave and not to hestitate to destroy any negativity, coming in any form to us. ==>Religious & spiritual: Yes they are two different terms. It is not necessary that every religious person is a spiritual person too. A spiritual person is the one who lives in spirit not in body. A spiritual person may not even believe in any religion. A religious person is no doubt a little lower than a spiritual person, though he may claim to be higher. Krishna: (to continue) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2003 Report Share Posted November 7, 2003 Dear dr_nachiketa, On behalf of the other moderators of this club, I extend a very warm welcome to you. Thank you for sharing your enlightening views with us. I pray that you continue to throw light on all the topics that we are discussing. Looking forward to hearing more from you. Thank you, Hari Aum !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.