Philosophy of Osho - Krishna Dancing with Gopikas

[Guest guest]

Osho clearly stated that. Many followers of Osho here have also accepted that.

This is condemned by Swamiji.

 

Always give importance to Truth which can be understood from the scriptures

and also from the practical life's of true devotees of the past.

 

This can never be denied by anybody. Lord will be pleased with you when you

follow His word. Then His grace showers automatically. If majority people say

stone as diamond, it will not become diamond. Our feelings are formed by our

limited knowledge. Some may be true and some may not be true. If a Satguru gives

knowledge, which can be judged with our intelligence and when convinced, we

should learn and change if needed. If we are rigid or try to follow majority,

that may not work out good results. sorry If you feel i am harsh. My intention

is not definitely to hurt you.

 

at the lotus feet of shri datta swami

surya

www.universal-spirituality.org

 

Ram Lubhaya Vashisth <rlvashisth wrote:

OSHO has created largest litreature in the world.He has spoken on

Budh,Mahavir,Gorakh,Nanak,Lao Meeran, Kabir, Dadu and many others.

Have you looked at his description of Bhagvat Geeta?You have seen GOD in

Mohamad and Budh and many others.You have seen GOD even in Scientists but you

could visualize HIM in OSHO.

I have read osho`s literature inj ample quantity.Nor I have studied nor gathered

any such impression that he allow married men,to make illegal relation with

other.

>From your posting one thing is clear that neither you under stand OSHO nor his

literature.You have no care for other`s feelings. With regards.

 

 

Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min

with Messenger with Voice.

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Prakki Surya

 

It is always important to remember that this is your personal

opinion. Each individual sees the Truth in his Guru and their

teachings, and to say that one Guru is totally wrong is simply

displaying one's own ignorance.

 

While I do not support many of the things that happened in the

organization of Bhagwan Rajneesh, I have read many of his texts, and

heard many many of his lectures. He has a mesmerizing voice, and

speaks volumes of truth, and I certainly have gained much from his

insights.

 

_/\_ Tat twam asi

 

Uma

 

, prakki surya <dattapr2000

wrote:

>

> Osho clearly stated that. Many followers of Osho here have also

accepted that. This is condemned by Swamiji.

>

> Always give importance to Truth which can be understood from the

scriptures and also from the practical life's of true devotees of

the past.

>

> This can never be denied by anybody. Lord will be pleased with

you when you follow His word. Then His grace showers automatically.

If majority people say stone as diamond, it will not become diamond.

Our feelings are formed by our limited knowledge. Some may be true

and some may not be true. If a Satguru gives knowledge, which can be

judged with our intelligence and when convinced, we should learn and

change if needed.

[Guest guest]

Respected Tatwamasi Ji,

Thank you very much,sir.Exactly are the my views,I also

do not support many of the things that happened in His organization and have

gained much

from his insight.I was not finding words to express my views but you did it in

a decent

way.

With regards.

 

Tatwamasi <tatwamasi wrote:

Dear Prakki Surya

 

It is always important to remember that this is your personal

[Guest guest]

>

> , prakki surya <dattapr2000@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Osho clearly stated that. Many followers of Osho here have also

 

 

Osho (Shri Rajneesh), was a unique experiment tried out by nature in

the modern era. Whereas most of the religions, and countries hated

him, the numbers of his followers increased day and night.

 

Osho gave a new life to the thought of Tantra in a simple and

practical language. Most of the systems of thougths and philosophies

rejected world as Maya and enjoyment of matter on physical plane was

seen as sin by them, a very few numbers of modern Indian thinkers

acccepted the Universe as God itself (Tagore, Shri Aurobindo and Osho).

 

Osho rejected strongly the organisational religions, showed the

hypocricy of the popes,maulavis and pundits....and called for a more

personal form of religion free from the fixed dogmas of churches.

 

Shri Vivekananda also emphasized that the true ideal conditions for

progress of spirituality in mankind would be achieved when each man

will have his own religion !

 

Osho did not reject the universe as Maya. He asked us to face it,

enjoy it, win it and transcend it. He called his followers to enjoy

the universe and its every moment....but as a Master...not as a slave

as most of the people doing it.

 

The media painted him black, because he was a threat to organised

religions, he blasted the hypocricy of religions. In certain terms he

never professed sex in any form.....he taught to transcend sex by not

depressing it but by letting it be turned into divine energy.

 

I can say he was the greatest Tantrik of the modern Era.

 

love

 

baba