va:lmi:ki Ra:ma:yana, no worship to Lord Siva by Sri Rama.

[Guest guest]

Priya Sriman Aravindaraman!

Jai Srimannarayana!

We are sure that you might have get the reply to your

question.

According to Sri va:lmi:ki Ra:ma:yana, there is no

mention about Sri:ra:ma's worship to Lord Siva. Lord

Siva appeared before Sri:ra:ma, after the death of

Ra:vana, along with all the other De:vathas. And then

Lord Siva praised Sri:ra:ma as the Ultimate Supreme

Lord to all the Ji:vas. And there only, he suggested

Sri:ra:ma to go back to Ayo:dhya and bless the

Bharatha and others for some time and come back to the

Divine abode, when all the De:vathas requested

Sri:ra:ma to come back to Divine Abode, because

Ra:vana was killed. This shows the concern that Lord

Siva has towards the Lord. That is all mentioned about

him. It was Tulasi Das who made somany inter-polations

about other dieties and also he made his own story

about Srira:ma in his Ra:macharitha Ma:nasa book.

He is the one who made the story of Ra:me:swaram in

his book. But it is not authentic sofar as Ra:ma's

history is concerned.

We always treat Sri RA:MA:YANA as our ancient history

and not just an epic or a pura:na. History means 'that

has to be accepted as it is without any changes or

additions'. Sri RA:MA:YANA & SRIMATH MAHA:BHA:RATHA

are our historic books, but not pura:na:s or epics.

Sri Tulasidas also made mistakes in this regard. This

made so many people to think about Srira:ma's worship

to Lord Siva.

There is one place in Va:lmi:ki Ra:ma:yana, where the

name "Maha:de:vaha" mentioned. People give the meaning

to that word as Lord Siva, which is wrong there.

The context is 'Ra:ma returning from Lanka in the

Pushpaka Vima:nam, along with Sitha and other

subjects. Sri Ra:ma was explaining the events and

places to Sitha from the areal view. While crossing

the Ocean, He was showing the bridge, constructed by

the Va:naras and said how that was built and so on.

When the flight reached the other end of the Sea, then

He said "Athra pu:rvam Maha:de:vah prasadam akaro:th

Prabhuhu" it means "O Sitha! when we wanted to cross

the ocean, it was here only, Maha:de:vah= The God of

Sea, Varunade:va, appeared and blessed us with the

means as and how can we build the bridge". Here the

word Maha:de:vah is wrongly interpreted by somany. In

fact, there was no Siva appeared during their sojourn

to Lanka.

Some people say that after killing the Ra:vana, Ra:ma

was possessed by Brahma Hatya Dosha ( A greater sin

captures by killing a brahmin)and to get rid of that

sin he consecrated the Siva Linga at Ra:me:swaram.

This is again a false story created without any

authority. If Ra:ma is captured by the sin, by killing

a Demon, who did all non-sense, then no one will dare

to punish wicked. By punishing a wicked person, no one

will be captured by sins. And Ra:ma never felt sorry

for killing Ra:vana and He never wanted to do any

Pra:yaschitta (purification act) for that act.

You may read Sri Va:lmi:ki Ra:ma:yana, whenever it is

possible. You can take it granted any event, which

goes inaccordance with that only. If something goes

against to that you need not ask anybody and think it

is a story created by the writer according to his own

wish.

=chinnajeeyar=

[Hariharabhakt]

 

Priya Sriman Aravindaraman!

Jai Srimannarayana!

We are sure that you might have get the reply to your

question.

According to Sri va:lmi:ki Ra:ma:yana, there is no

mention about Sri:ra:ma's worship to Lord Siva. Lord

Siva appeared before Sri:ra:ma, after the death of

Ra:vana, along with all the other De:vathas. And then

Lord Siva praised Sri:ra:ma as the Ultimate Supreme

Lord to all the Ji:vas. And there only, he suggested

Sri:ra:ma to go back to Ayo:dhya and bless the

Bharatha and others for some time and come back to the

Divine abode, when all the De:vathas requested

Sri:ra:ma to come back to Divine Abode, because

Ra:vana was killed. This shows the concern that Lord

Siva has towards the Lord. That is all mentioned about

him. It was Tulasi Das who made somany inter-polations

about other dieties and also he made his own story

about Srira:ma in his Ra:macharitha Ma:nasa book.

He is the one who made the story of Ra:me:swaram in

his book. But it is not authentic sofar as Ra:ma's

history is concerned.

We always treat Sri RA:MA:YANA as our ancient history

and not just an epic or a pura:na. History means 'that

has to be accepted as it is without any changes or

additions'. Sri RA:MA:YANA & SRIMATH MAHA:BHA:RATHA

are our historic books, but not pura:na:s or epics.

Sri Tulasidas also made mistakes in this regard. This

made so many people to think about Srira:ma's worship

to Lord Siva.

There is one place in Va:lmi:ki Ra:ma:yana, where the

name "Maha:de:vaha" mentioned. People give the meaning

to that word as Lord Siva, which is wrong there.

The context is 'Ra:ma returning from Lanka in the

Pushpaka Vima:nam, along with Sitha and other

subjects. Sri Ra:ma was explaining the events and

places to Sitha from the areal view. While crossing

the Ocean, He was showing the bridge, constructed by

the Va:naras and said how that was built and so on.

When the flight reached the other end of the Sea, then

He said "Athra pu:rvam Maha:de:vah prasadam akaro:th

Prabhuhu" it means "O Sitha! when we wanted to cross

the ocean, it was here only, Maha:de:vah= The God of

Sea, Varunade:va, appeared and blessed us with the

means as and how can we build the bridge". Here the

word Maha:de:vah is wrongly interpreted by somany. In

fact, there was no Siva appeared during their sojourn

to Lanka.

Some people say that after killing the Ra:vana, Ra:ma

was possessed by Brahma Hatya Dosha ( A greater sin

captures by killing a brahmin)and to get rid of that

sin he consecrated the Siva Linga at Ra:me:swaram.

This is again a false story created without any

authority. If Ra:ma is captured by the sin, by killing

a Demon, who did all non-sense, then no one will dare

to punish wicked. By punishing a wicked person, no one

will be captured by sins. And Ra:ma never felt sorry

for killing Ra:vana and He never wanted to do any

Pra:yaschitta (purification act) for that act.

You may read Sri Va:lmi:ki Ra:ma:yana, whenever it is

possible. You can take it granted any event, which

goes inaccordance with that only. If something goes

against to that you need not ask anybody and think it

is a story created by the writer according to his own

wish.

=chinnajeeyar=

By Posting This You are Insulting Shri Ram