Guest guest Posted October 26, 2001 Report Share Posted October 26, 2001 Priya Srimna Tharanarasimhanji! Jai Srimannarayana! Your mail is good. But did not you notice the contrast in between your own sentenses? Lord Siva worshiped Sri RAma. But not Rama worshiped Siva, according to Sriramayanam. Sitha has no time to make Sivalingam on the banks of Ocean, while going to Lanka or while coming bank from Lanka also. So that story is also a "madeup" story. Hanuman is not the incarnation of Lord Siva. So many people say so. but he himself mentioned in somay places in Ramayana that he is "Hanuman Ma:rutha:thmajah". If these great research scholars contradict Hanuman's own words and establish something of their own findings that Hanuman is Siva's amsa. Again Sri Valmika never mentioned about this anywhere in his scripture. We are talking according to the book only, for , neither you nor We or others who pass on their commentaries, have ever seen what Hanuman was or Is, are will be, with their own knowledge. We are sure that you try to understand. =chinnajeeyar= --- Thara Narasimhan <tnarasimhan wrote: > Pujya Swamiji, > > I read your article regards Rama worshipping Shiva. > Isn't it > not true the Hanuman was the incarnation of Shiva > and it is justifiable that > Hanuman constantly repeated the name of "Ramanama" > all the time. This also ......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.