Guest guest Posted July 8, 2002 Report Share Posted July 8, 2002 SrImate rAmAnujAya nama: Dear Friends, Contrary to popular belief, there is no mention that SrI rAma worshipped Siva in SrImad vaalmiikii rAmAyaNam which is the most authentic version. SrI-vaishNavam is based on the apaursheya Veda-s which unambiguously identify VishNu (SrI's consort)and none else as the purushOttama (Supreme Person) and Supreme Being, the worshippable God. The most benevolent sadAcArya SrI vedAnta-deSikA cites many pramANa-s indicating SrIman-nArAyaNa (VishNu) as the Highest worshippable God. Veda-s themselves declare that itihAsa-s as a fifth veda. So mahA-bhAratham is a valid text helpful in determining the nature of Supreme Truth as-it-is. svAmi SrI vedAnta deSika quotes profusely from mahA-bhAratha to establish that worship of VishNu is the best. 1) catur-mukha-brahmA and rudra (Siva) are not Supreme Beings. They are actually *created* Beings. 1a) samkshipya ca lokAn mAyyA svayameva hi | mahArNave SayAno'psu mAm tvam pUrvamajIjana: || - SrImad rAmAyaNam 7.104.4 catur-mukha-brahmA says to vishNu: "Lord (VishNu) ! Earlier, out of Your own Divine Will, having dissolved all creations, lying down in the waters of praLaya ocean, You created me first." 1b) aham prasAdajastasya kasminScit kAraNAntare | tvam caiva krodhajastAta pUrva-sarge sanAtane || -- mahA-bhAratham, SAnti-parvam 352-62 catur-mukha-brahmA says to Siva: " I (catur-mukha-brahmA) was created when SrIman-nArAyaNa had been pleased with something. You (Siva) were also *created* when the Lord had had some kind of displeasure." 2) catur-mukha-brahmA, rudra etc are influenced by karma. They *attained* their respective *devata positions* by worshipping the Supreme Lord, VishNu. 2a) sabrahmakAssarudrASca sendrA devA maharshaya: | arcayanti sura-SreshTham devam nArAyaNam harim || -- mahA-bhAratham. SAnti-parvam 350-30 catur-mukha-brahmA, Siva, indra, deva-s, and Rshi-s worship Lord SrI-hari Who is the best amongst the devas. 2b) cintayanto hi yam nityam brahmeSAnAdaya: prabhum | niScayam nAdhigacchanti tam-asmi SaraNam gata: || -- mahA-bhAratham, SAnti-purvam 210-33 Though they always meditate on SrIman-nArayaNa as their prabhu, catur-mukha-brahmA, Siva etc do not surely know His true nature. 2c) mahA-deva: sarva-medhe mahAtmA hutvA'tmAnam deva-devao babhUva | viSvAn lokAn vyApya vishTabhya kIrtyA virAjate dyutimAn kRttivAsA: || -- mahA-bhAratham (SAnti-parvam 20-12) The mahAtmA, Siva (mahA-deva) offered himself in a sarvamedha-yAgam and thus *became* one of the best among the deva-s. Then Siva *became* pervaded all worlds with his (acquired) jnAna and assumed eight different brilliant forms. The elephant-hide-cladden Siva thus *became* glorious celebrity. 3) catur-mukha-brahmA, rudra etc are subject to the dictates of vishNu's mAyA (deluding power). They are under the influence of tri-guNa (matter) . Also, their knowledge expand & contract subject to karma. They are actually completely dependent on Lord SrI vishNu . brahmAdyAs-sakalA devA manushyA: paSavasthA | uttamAm sAttvikImetAm gatimAhur-manIshiNa: || manu-dharma 12-50 Those that predominantly had sattva-guNa in a previous birth and had performed exceedingly good deeds, are reborn as a catur-mukha- brahmA (or Siva), nine prajApati-s, dharma, mahat, avyakta (abhimAni-devata-s thereof) etc. 4) catur-mukha-brahmA, rudra etc obtain jnAna from SrIman-nArAyaNa in order to perform their duties (as devotional service to nArAyaNa) . etau vibuddha-SreshThau prasAda-krodhajau smRtau | tadAdarSita-panthAnau sRshTi-samhAra-kArakau || -- mahA-bhAratham (SAnti-parvam 350-19) catur-muka-brahma & Siva are born respectively out of bhagavAn vishNu's pleasure & displeasure. catur-mukha-brahmA & Siva perform their duties with the knowledge provided to them by vishNu. 5) catur-mukha-brahmA, rudra etc are not capable of removing sin (ie they are not SubhASrayam) karmaNAm paripAkatvAn AvirincAd-amangaLam | iti matvA viraktasya vAsu-deva: parA gati: || -- SrImad-bhAgavatam 11.19.18 catur-mukha-brahmA (, Siva) etc are born to reap their own karma, For those rejecting the desire to reach such karma-vaSya-s as catur-mukha-brahmA etc, Vasudeva is the Highest Desirable Being (the only One capable of removing sins). 6) SrIman-nArAyaNa is the Supreme-Self supporting & controlling catur-mukha-brahmA and Siva etc. tavAtarAtmA mama ca ye cAnye dehimsamgyitA: | sarveshAm sAkshi-bhUto'sau na grAhya: kenacin kvacit || -- mahA-bhAratham (SAnti-parvam 361-4) catur-mukha-brahmA says to Siva, "bhagavAn vishNu knows (sAkshi) all the activities of your's (Siva's), mine and all jIvas embodied by karma. However, but bhagavAn vishNu remains unknowable to anyone (of us) at any time." 7) SrIman-nArAyaNa is unparalled & unsurpassed . 7a) vAsudevo mahad-bhUtam sarva-daivata-daivatam | na param puNDarIkAkshAt dRshyate purusharshabha || - mahA-bhAratham (bhIshma-parvam 67-2) "Oh Best among men ! There is no God equal or superior to the Lotus-eyed Lord vAsudeva." 7b) esha dhAtA vidhAtA ca sarveshAm prANinAm prabhu: | param hi puNDarIkAkshAt na-bhUtam na-bhavishyati || - mahA-bhAratham (bhIshma-parvam 67-17) God superior to the Lotus-eyed vishNu never ever existed & will never exist ever. 8) Difference between bhagavAn vishNu and other devata-s. 8a) jAyamAnam hi purusham yam paSyen-madhu-sUsana: | sAttvikassatu vigyeyassa vai mokshArthi-cintaka: || paSyatyenam jAyamAnam brahmA rudro'thavA puna: | rajasA tamasA cAsya mAnasam samabhiplutam || - mahA-bhAratham (SAnti-parvam 358-73, 358-77) If one is recepient of vishNu's benediction at the time of one's birth, one will have sattva quality predominantly and will have desire for moksha (ie eternal service to vishNu). but at one's birth, catur-mukha-brahmA's benediction will only produce rajo-guNa (passion) predominantly and Siva's benediction will only produce predominant tamo-guNa (ignorance). 8b) brahmANam SitikaNTham ca yAScAnyA devatA-smRtA: | prati-buddhA na sevante yasmAt pari-mitam phalam || - mahA-bhAratham (SAnti-parvam 350-36) Intelligent people (desiring moksha) do not worship catur-mukha- brahmA, Siva etc because such devata-s can 'confer' only petty (short-lived) results. 8c) kAnkshanta: karmaNAm siddhim yajanta iha devatA: | kshipram hi mAnushe loke siddhir-bhavati karmajA || - SrImad rAmAyaNam 6-18-33 If SrI-rAma is determined to punish someone, neither the four-headed brahmA nor Siva nor indra could save that person. 8d) sa tayA SraddhayA yukta: tasyArAdhanamIhate | labhate ca tata: kAmAn mayaiva vihitAn hi tAn || -bhagavad gItA 7-22 Results obtained through demigod-worship are actually given by Me only. 8e) rUpa-prakAra-parimANa-kRtavyavastham viSvam viparyasitumanyadasacca kartum | kshAmyan svabhAvaniyamam kimudIkshase tvam svAntantryamaiSvaramaparyanuyojyamAhu: || - bhagavad-gItA 9-23 Arjuna ! Those that worship demi-gods devoutly & faithfully, indeed worship Me only. but their worship is incorrect and inconsistent with SAstra-s. Conclusion: Atmaikyam, devataikyam, trikasamAdhi-gatA tulyatA, aikyam trayANAm, anyatra aiSvaryam, ityAdi anipuNa-phaNitI: Adriyante na santa: | traiyyantai: eka-kaNThai: tad-anuguNa manu-vyAsa-mukhyoktibhi: ca SrIman-nArAyaNo na: pati: akhila-tanu: mukti-da: mukta-bhogya: || - svAmi SrImAn vedAnta-deSika "All AtmA are the one", "All devata-s are one", "trimUrti-s have equivalent jnAna & Sakti", "trimUrti-s AtmA-s are essentially same", "Something other than the trimUrt-s, is the Lord", and such similar statements are made by the naive. They do not fascinate the wise (ie santa-s or viveki-s who are expert at discriminating the best from the rest.) Rather, for us who rely on the consistent message of the upanishad-s and the words of such experts as SrI manu, SrI vyAsa etc, our Master is the Supreme Lord SrIman-nArAyaNa, who has everything else inseparably as His 'body', Who bestows moksha (ie eternal devotional service) and Who is experienced wholly by mukta-s. SrImadANDavan tiruvaDigaLE SaraNam ! aDiyEn rAmAnuja-dAsan //Ramkumar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2002 Report Share Posted July 17, 2002 Dear Sri Ramkumar, > “Veda-s themselves declare that itihAsa-s as a fifth veda”. could you please provide the citation for this. I do not recall any such verse. If we hold to the traditional arguments that the Veda is prabhala as it is shruti; all other sastras are Smrti and hence inevitably subordinate the above statement seems an obvious interpolation. Further, according to the traditional canon, only that which is in accord with shruti, yukti and anubhava should be accepted as genuine. All others are to be rejected. Have a nice day now. Nagendra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2002 Report Share Posted July 18, 2002 SrI: Vedic pramANa-s indicating validity of itihAsa purANa-s as being a useful in properly undertstanding the veda-s : 1) Rg-vedam bhagavOdhyemi yajur-vedam sAma-vedamAtharvaNam caturtham-itihAsa-purANam pancamam vedAnAm vedam. -- ChAndoyopanishad 7,1,2 [ The above reference in chandoyopanishad is confirmed by SrI vAtsyAyana, the author of nyAya-sUtra-s: "purANena khalu brAhmaNetihAsa-purANasya prAmANyamabhyupagamyate| te vA khelvetetharvA'ngirasa etad-itihAsa-purANasya prAmANya- mabhyavadan 'itihAsa-purANam ca pancamam vedAnAm veda' iti chAndogye" - nyAya-sutre, 4, 1, 62 vAtsyAyana: "The brAhmaNa portion of the veda is an authority and it accepts the authority of the itihAsa and purANa inasmuchas the atharvAngiras people declared in chAndogyopanishad: 'The itihAsa-purANa is a veda among the veda-s' " ] 2) are'sya mahato bhUtasya ni:Svasitametad yadRgvedo yajur-veda: sAma-vedo'tharvAngirasa itihAsa-purANam . -- bRhadAraNyakopanishad 2,4,11 Yagyavalkya instructs maitreyI, "The Rg-veda, yajur-veda, sAma-veda, atharvAgIrasa-veda and itihAsa-purANa - all that is exhalation of this Great Being". 3) brAhmaNAnItihAsAn purANAni kalpAn gAthA nArASamsIriti -- taittirIyAraNyakam 2,9 The brAhmaNa-s, itihAsa, purANa-s, kalpa-s, gAtha-s and nArASamsI-s (are helpful in the study of the veda-s). aDiyEn rAmAnuja-dAsa //Ramkumar , "Nagendra S. Rao" <n.s.rao@a...> wrote: > > > 'Veda-s themselves declare that itihAsa-s as a fifth veda' > could you please provide the citation for this. > I do not recall any such verse. > [...] > Nagendra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.