Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Q - comments on Vishnu article

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

This response refers to the Hefner Vishnu article forwarded by raghu raghu

(newyork). The Vishnu Idol, when enlarged, is appealing and has a charm to it.

The Hefner article is somewhat journalistic, touching upon just the salient

features. Even here, there are some inaccuracies, such as Krishna being

described as the 8th Avatar, when in fact we say Krishna comes after Balarama

and is the 9th Avatar. Rama and Krisha avataras are considred purna avatars.

 

Also it has now been established that the discussion of “Hinduism” along

Aryan/Dravidian lines is erroneous.

 

What the short note does not mention is the Vedic background in which Vishnu

cannot be “raised to higher rankings.” He is just that and has been occupying

the highest place amongst the gods always. For us, Vishnu is Shriman Narayana,

Sri Lakshmi sameta. Shriman Narayana has always been the beginning and the end,

Vaikuntanatha. The divinity enshrined is the name of Sri Vishnu does not emerge

from the short note.

Ippadikku, Adiyen Sri Ramanuja dasan

sudhanvachar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...