Guest guest Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 With respect, I would like to submit this question: I am confused about the "varunashrama" and how it came into being. From what I have been taught, I understand that it was a segration of society based on responsibilities. I can see how it became ingrained in the society due to responsibilities passed on from one generation to another. What do our vedas, upannishads, ithihasas and puranas say about this? Did people suffer from discrimination in those days? What was Manu's motive in formulating "varunashrama"? Going by Lord Rama and Lord Krishna's lives, they did not practice any discrimination. Their "shousheelyam" was an example to others. So how do we explain this terrible degradation that is afflicting our society? Ranga Nathan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2005 Report Share Posted March 28, 2005 QUESTION) Q - Misunderstandings regarding "varunashrama" With respect, I would like to submit this question: I am confused about the "varunashrama" and how it came into being. From what I have been taught, I understand that it was a segration of society based on responsibilities. I can see how it became ingrained in the society due to responsibilities passed on from one generation to another. What do our vedas, upannishads, ithihasas and puranas say about this? Did people suffer from discrimination in those days? What was Manu's motive in formulating "varunashrama"? Going by Lord Rama and Lord Krishna's lives, they did not practice any discrimination. Their "shousheelyam" was an example to others. So how do we explain this terrible degradation that is afflicting our society? Ranga Nathan ANS: PRIYA SRIMAN RANGA NATHANJI! Jai SRIMANNARAYANA! DISCUSSION CREPT INTO THE MIND OF THE ELITE. NOT IN ALL ORDINARY MASSES. THEY FOLLOW THEIR OWN RULES AND REGULATIONS, SINCERELY. WHY DID THIS DISCUSSION START? BECAUSE, THERE IS SOME SORT OF CLASH AMONG THE SECTIONS. WHY THE CLASH? BECAUSE, THERE IS SOME SORT OF MISUNDERSTANDING BETWEEN SECTIONS. WHY THAT MISUNDERSTANDING? BECAUSE, SOME PEOPLE, BRITISHERS IN PARTICULAR, WANTED TO DIVIDE THE SOCIETY, WHICH WAS APPEARING TO THEM, VERY MUCH STRONG ROOTED, ANCIENT, WORSHIPPABLE CIVILIZATION, SELF-CONTENDED,UNITED, EXEMPLARY TO THE REST OF THE WORLD ETC.,,,,. THEY DID NOT WANT SOME OTHER SOCIETY SHOULD POSSESS THESE QUALITIES OTHER THAN THEIRS'. BECAUSE IT IS THERE ALREADY, THEY TRIED THEIR LEVEL BEST TO KILL THIS SOCIETY AT ALL COSTS & BY ALL MEANS, AS THEY DID WITH RED-INDIANS OF US, ABBORIGINS OF AUSTRALIA AND SO ON. WITH INDIAN, THEY FAILED IN THAT VENTURE. THEY FACED A LOT OF RESISTANCE. THEY KNEW THAT THEY HAVE TO QUIT THE BHARAT ONE DAY. BUT THEIR AIM TO ROOT-OUT OTHER CIVILIZATIONS SHOUD ALSO BE ACHIEVED. THEN THEY STARTED PLANNING TO BREAK IT INTO PIECES. THEN THEY PLANNED TO DIVIDE & RULE. INTRODUCED DIFFERENT TYPES OF EDUCATION, PROVIDED PHYSICAL COMFORTS, WHICH WE NEVER CRAVED FOR, MADE SLAVES TO THEM. TEMPTED SECTIONS OF THE SOCIETY TO FIGHT FOR THE EQUALITY. EQUALITY WILL NEVER BE POSSIBLE AMONG ALL THE HUMAN BEINGS. WHITE AND BLACKS THOUGH LIVE IN THE SAME COUNTRY WILL NEVER TREAT EACH EQUALLY. THE PRESIDENT OF THE COUNTYR AND THE FARMER WILL NEVER BECOME EQUAL AT ANY COST. AS YOU MENTIONED, DIVISION OF THE LABOUR FOR DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES MAY BE ONE OF THE ASPECTS BETWEEN DIFFERENT SECTIONS. YET, CASTES WERE NOT CREATED BY JUST MAN. IT COMES BY BIRTH NOT BY ACTION. NOW A DAYS, PEOPLE STARTED INTERPRETING THEM IN THEIR OWN WAYS. WHICH THEY DO KNOW IS WRONG. ALL THAT WE WANT, NOT REMOVING THE CASTES, BUT REMOVING THE CLASHES BETWEEN CASTES. RELATION WITH GOD, IS THE MAIN CONCEPT OF THE (RELIGION, IF THE TRANSLATION IS RIGHT) MATHAM, i.e., DOCTRINE. RELATIONSHIP THROUGH GOD EITHER BY VISHNU OR SIVA OR SOME OTHER FORM. THIS WILL ULTIMATE SHOULD MAKE ALL SECTIONS TO COME TOGETHER IN WORSHIPING THAT PARTICULAR FORM OF GOD. UNFORTUNATELY, THAT ALSO CREATED MANY CLASHES. FIGHTING BETWEEN SAIVATES AND VAISHNAVITES, VEDICS AND CHRISTIANS, CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS, MUSLIMS AND OTHERS ETC., BUT THE FUN HERE IS VEDIC PEOPLE ACCEPT ALL OTHER FORMS OF WORSHIP ALSO AS A SOURCE TO GET ULTIMATE REALIZATION IN A STEPPED MANNER. BUT IT IS SAD, OTHER DOCTRINES OR RELIGIONS WILL NEVER ACCEPT THAT OTHER THAN THEM ALSO A WAY. THEY ALL SAY THAT THEIRS IS ONLY 'THE WAY'. THIS IS SO IMMETURED IDEALOGY. WHEREAS OUR VEDIC IDEALOGY IS HIGHLY MATURED WAY TO ACCEPT EVERY WAY AS A WAY. TRY TO UNDERSTAND THIS. WE THINK,ATLEAST, SOME PART OF QUESTION IS ANSWERED. =Chinnajeeyar= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.