Guest guest Posted December 26, 2005 Report Share Posted December 26, 2005 Part Two of Sri Nampillai's Life Sketch By: U.Ve. Sri E.S. Bhuvarahachariar Swamy Hereafter the narrative account of Nampillai's life history is interspersed with a series of serious questions posed by him to his revered Acharya, Sri Nanjeeyar and the latter's crisp and clear cut answers which dispel several doubts lingering in our mind for a very long time as a result of which it is well nigh impossible to erase them from our poor hearts. So the remaining part in this essay assumes greater importance. It is worthwhile to bestow the best attention on this question and answer section. Q1. Once Sri Nampillai questioned his preceptor " There are so many means of salvation (upayas) prescribed by the shastras as Karma yoga, Gnana yoga, Bhakti yoga, offering garlands to the deity Sriman Narayana, lighting lamps in His temple, residing at the Divya Desams like Srirangam etc., chanting His sweet names, Purushothama vidya, the knowledge of the secret cause of Sriman Narayana's incarnations etc., There are also innumerable pramanas (Authoritative Supporting Statements) in the shastras for all these upayas. The followers of these upayas (means of salvation) are also in majority in this world. But for Saranagathi (accepting Sriman Narayana as the sole, safe, secured means of salvation) the pramanas are less in number and the followers are to be traced. The Rishi (sage), chandas, devathas (the deities) are mentioned in the case of other upayas namely Karma yoga etc., whereas they are missing in Saranagathi. Why this disparity between the two when Saranagathi is the easiest means of salvation? Sri Nanjeeyar's Answer (S.N.A) - There is no need for any pramana in the case of Saranagathi, because it is something that is self-evident and therefore requires no proof or pramana. Let me explain it by an example viz: Two men are crossing a river. One has fallen into the depth of the river and is sinking. Does the other man go in search of a Pramana to lift up and save the sinking one? He saves him automatically. All the Jeevatmas who have fallen into the ocean of samsara are equal to the sinking man. Sriman Narayana lifts them up by stretching forth his merciful hands. Therefore it is nothing but common sense and requires no pramana. Here are the pramanas if you still insist upon getting some pramanas. In the Vedanta a very well known statement runs as follows: Pramana no 1. "yo Brahmanam..mumukshurvai saranamaham prapadye" (sweta asvatara Upanishad) Meaning: ("First of all Sriman Narayana created Brahma. He taught him the entire Vedas. He has given me the clear knowledge with reference to Him. I take refuge under Him desiring salvation" says Veda Purusha.) Pramana no 2. "Tasmath Nyasa mesham Tapasam Atriktham Ahu:" (Taitriya Narayana - 50) Meaning: ("Therefore this Nyasa namely Saranagathi excels all other penances") Pramana no 3. "Nyasa Ithyahuhu maneeshino Brahmanam" (Taitriya Narayana - 50) Meaning: (Wise men declare that Saranagathi is the Brahman (Sriman Narayana) Himself) Pramana no 4. "Nikshepa aparaparyayo Nyasa: Panchangasamyutha Sanyas: styaga ithyuktha saranagathirithyapi" (Lakshmi Tantram 17-74) Meaning: (Surrendering to God (nikshepa) has five accessories. The word "nikshepa" has several synonyms like Nyasa, Sanyasa, thyaga and Saranagathi. Thus pramanas are readily available and they are also many. There is no dearth of such pramanas. You should not judge the superiority of other upayas by the majority of people opting for them. Among the worldly men only some can become sanyasins on that score can you say that the sanyasins are inferior to others? I will give you another example (said Nanjeeyar) "Jyothishtomena Suvarga Kamo yajetha" is a Vedic statement. This means perform a sacrifice by name Jyothishoma if you wish to reach Heaven (Indra's world) and enjoy celestial pleasures there. But not everyone performs the sacrifice. Very few interested in reaching heaven perform it. Do you mean to say that those few men are inferior to others? Certainly not. Comparatively speaking that the pleasures in Indra's world is far inferior to the indescribable unimaginable and endless pleasures of Sri Vaikuntam, the heavenly abode of Sriman Narayana. In the case of Swarga (Indra's abode) the pleasures are limited and have an end. Those who go there return to this mortal world after exhausting their punyas (merits) whereas those who go to Vaikunta Loka will never return. Only very few people are interested in going to swarga (Indra Loka) even though all people come to know that pleasures of heaven are most enjoyable and superior. That being the case there is no wonder if a very few people resort to Saranagathi. Therefore the majority or the minority of followers does not decide the issue. Hence the greatness of Saranagathi cannot be measured or estimated by the availability of numerous pramanas or by the majority of people opting for it. Oh! Nampillai, you asked me another question - Why there is no prescription of Rishi, Chandas, and Devatha etc in the case of Saranagathi. We find them in the case of other upayas. The answer is this. "Rishya adheencha Karanyasam Anganyasancha Varjayet". This is a famous dictum ruling out the prescription of Rishi etc., Anganyasa, and Karanyasa, which are laid down as accessories for other upayas. Hence you find the surrenderers not desiring all preliminary rites. I wish to add one thing more. The lord who is Saranya has an aversion to accept any kind of assistance while saving the surrenderer. He is called Nirapeksha upaya. This is the meaning of "Eka" sabda in "Sarvadharman Parityajya Mam Ekam Saranam Vraja" (Nirapeksha upaya means he does not expect any other help in salvaging the souls of this world. That being the case with regard to the Lord there is no wonder that the saranagathi, which is synonymous with Him, will also not tolerate Anganyasa, Karanyasa etc., This is my strong faith. Nampillai listened to his Acharya with rapt attention and thought that he was very fortunate in getting such a holy preceptor. Q.no 2. Nampillai asked his teacher: "How can a man understand that he has the qualities of a Srivaishnava?" (It means what are the special identifying characteristics of a Srivaishnava) S.N.A - a. If a man comes to know that the Lord Sriman Narayana in his Archavatara (in his idol form in temples and other places) does possess all his supreme powers as in Srivaikunta Loka, He can consider himself to be a Srivaishnava (That means it is very difficult for an ordinary person to have great faith in Archavatara. The moment he thinks that Archavatara has both paratva and soulabhya he becomes a Srivaishnava. Archavatara Pravanya as Thirumangai Alwar possessed is a very important criterion for a Srivaishnava, which is very difficult to get) b. A man in general loves his son and wife very dearly. If he possesses that much love and affection towards a Srivaishnava, he can consider himself as included in the list of Srivaishnavas. (The man is expected to shower more love on a Srivaishnava than he does toward his family members. Here it is amusing to see that some concession is allowed by Sri Nanjeeyar.) c. When abused by a Srivaishnava, if a man does not become angry, but on the contrary receives his wrathful words with a cheerful countenance and as an enjoyable pleasure he is a Srivaishnava. Therefore a man should possess these three important qualities as explained before. They are 1. Archaavatara Paratva Buddhi 2. Bhagavatha Prema 3. Bhagavatha Katinokthi Bhogyatha Buddhi If any one after close examination of him finds that he is in possession of these three virtues, he can conclude within himself that he is a Srivaishnava (Author's note: Please check yourself) Q.no.3 Sri Nampillai was studying Sri Bhashyam (Sanskrit commentary of Sri Ramanuja on Brahma Sutras composed by Vyasa) under the guidance of Sri Nanjeeyar. At that time the food was ready for the offering of the Lord. Sri Nanjeeyar was informed about this so that he may perform "Tiruvaradhanam"(Pooja) to his deity at his mansion. The teacher ordered the pupil, Sri Nampillai to perform the pooja. The disciple respectfully and humbly told the teacher that he was ignorant of the manner of performing as it would by performed by his Acharya. The teacher quipped, "Do you think that I know very well the procedure? Can you not simply chant the second half of Dwaya Mantra (Srimathe Naraayanaya Namaha) and wash the holy feet of the Lord. (The idol called Chokka Thevar at my residence) and offer the cooked food to him with due respect (Note - This answer points towards the Saulabhya of the Lord unlike the demigods. It is easy to satisfy him by a very simple Pooja. No elaborate and painful procedure is needed "parivadil eeshan" says Sri Nammazhwar in his Tiruvaimozhi. Parivatu means distressing, painful and agonizing procedure of pooja. Il means there is not. The Lord, Sriman Narayana is known for His simplicity.) Sri Nampillai got another doubt. So he questioned the teacher. Respected Swamin, there are 108 Divya Desas. We have to perform pooja to all the presiding deities in all the holy shrines but we perform pooja only to God in our house. Are we not expected to do this service to all 108 forms? If that is so how to do it? Is it not humanly impossible? By offering food to one deity at our residence are we not allowing the 108 deities starve? Sri Nanjeeyar smiled and replied with affection "The remedy for this, my dear son! is as follows- First of all chant the purva vakya (i.e. the former sentence of Dwaya) . After that and before pronouncing the uttara vakya (the latter sentence of Dwaya) you include the word "Sarva Mangala Vigrahaya". Now all the deities in all 108 Temples appear before you in the form of the deity at your house. Thereby you are considered to have performed pooja to all those deities. >From this question and answer it becomes evident to us that our illustrious Acharyas never wash the holy feet of the deities in their respective mansions without uttering the Dwaya Mantra. That means Dwaya Mantra stands supreme. Q.no.4. Sri Nampillai, one day further questioned his teacher, "Dear Swamin, why the Lord is born in this world?" (i.e. What purpose do the incarnations of Sriman Narayana serve). S.N.A.- "Oh! My dear son! The Lord takes several births in this world and performs Herculean tasks even as a wild elephant does by dragging huge and heavy trees. It is in order to inflict severe punishment on those wretched souls who have committed several offences towards His earnest devotees. Now this answer of the Guru tempted the disciple to know what are all the Bhagavatha Apachara (i.e. offences towards the devotees). Accordingly he put the question to his preceptor- "what is Bhagavatha Apachara?" S.N.A. - The first and foremost of Bhagavatha Apachara is equating a Srivaishnava to himself on seeing him. Why it should not be done? It is because the Alwars have vociferously praised Sri Vaishnavas to the skies and never equated them (SriVaishnavas) to themselves though the Alwars are SriVaishnavas of par excellence by the graceful blessings of Lord Sriman Narayana. By this we understand that if we consider that SriVaishnavas are equal to us that is Bhagavatha Apachara. Nanjeeyar in this context quotes numerous passages from Nalayira Divya Prabhandham of Alwars to substantiate this view. (It is better to know it from Acharya or otherwise giving a long list of them here will not be conducive to the narrative interest). Once SriNanjeeyar out of unbounded affection towards SriNampillai voluntarily came out with a great truth that should get embedded in the hearts of all Srivaishnavas. TO BE CONTINUED.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.