Guest guest Posted March 12, 1999 Report Share Posted March 12, 1999 The following is an article written by Jeremy Seabrook, for the Third World Network Features, an independent news service from Penang, Malaysia. Our Vedic-Culture egroup is primarily dedicated to subjects pertaining to Vedic culture and history. However,this information is applicable because India, the cradle of Vedic civilization is one of the prime targets of the Market Economy's Tyranny of Money. It is important that we understand the fact that most of India's current problems have been artificially imposed upon her.I also believe, it is important to, not only, always be aware of the current state of World affairs, but to understand the dynamics behind them. As the sayings go, “Knowledge is Power,” and “The Truth Shall Set Us Free.” Vrin Parker =============================================================================== THE TYRANNY OF MONEY “Absolute poverty has declined from 70% in 1960 to almost 30% today,” says a TV advertisement for CARE. But there is a problem with most definitions of poverty. It is common for humanitarians to cite the fact that there are one billion people in the world who live on less than a dollar a day. This fact is sited as proof of unspeakable deprivations. But life with zero income does not have to be degrading, if people can provide all their own needs for themselves. On the other hand, an income of $25,000 may be called poverty when all needs must be purchased, and the sum is insufficient for the purpose. To recreate poverty in the image of the West—as a monetary sum, the absence of which means you are poor—is perhaps the most effective way of setting the whole world on the same developmental path, for it means that the norms of the market economy are being universalized. Once the measures of wealth and poverty that depend on money have been accepted, the poor are condemned to an eternity of poverty. In the market economy, people must learn how to be poor. What social reformers are really saying, when they cite people living on less than a dollar a day, is that they were excluded from the market economy. The idea that this, in and of itself, is an index of poverty is the profound untruth that lies beneath all money-dominated statistics and measurements of poverty. Another way of looking at those who have not yet entered the market economy is to say they remain free and independent of market provided needs and commodities. So when it is declared that there is a 40% reduction in the number of absolute poor, what they are really saying is that there has been 40% reduction in the number of people living, surviving and existing comfortably outside the market system. This has created unnecessary confusion. This is the real scandal. All those still living outside the market economy give the lie to the totalizing thrust of globalization and the imperatives of conforming to one particular way of answering need. (In other words, self sufficient people and communities expose the falsity of the Market Economy. This is one of the primary reasons groups like the Native Americans were hunted and decimated to near extinction.VP) There is a word for this. It is Tyranny. The struggle to establish the uncontested dominance of the world market has been the true locus of attack upon, not only the poor of the Earth, but all those whose way of life is to reproach the market economy. The struggle has been a kind of low-intensity warfare. Its battle cry has been “development.” Its weaponry has been money, its foot soldiers the high consuming middle class that has emerged in virtually every country. At the same time, a distinctly more aggressive war has been carried on against those people who still occupy forests, coastal environments, subsistence farms, and river-banks and whose resources-minerals, metals, timber, fish water-must be surrendered to the market. In the name of “bringing these people into the 20th century,” they have been systematically dispossessed and violently removed from ancestral lands. In India, in the 50 years since independence, 25 million people have been displaced for infrastructual or so-called developmental projects. The market offers instruction in being poor. First, it removes from individuals and groups of people the capacity to provide for their own needs and the needs of others, and it creates dependency. Second, the market teaches about what we do not have. Through self –reliance we learn what we need, and that is surprisingly little; through the market we learn what we might get. In that sense, the market serves the growing self-consciousness of an industrialized humanity that must now understand that all the familiar artifacts and goods of traditional culture are actually junk, and that everything that is produced elsewhere is of superior value, set by its monetary price. In this way, inferiorization, subordination, and dependency are the principal gifts of the market economy to self-reliance. By destroying our natural self-reliance, through the tyranny of money, the market economy has set all of humanity in a sad and circular dance. A chase of perpetual keeping up with an abstraction, the limitlessness of human desire and cravings, and they have taught that wisdom lies in recognizing the impossibility of pursuing it.” Jeremy Seabrook =============================================================================== I will close this message with a quote from Mohandas K. Gandhi, that sums it up perfectly, “There is enough in this world for mankind’s needs, but not for mankind’s greed.” Namaste, Vrin Parker ------ eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/vediculture Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.