Guest guest Posted July 29, 1999 Report Share Posted July 29, 1999 THIS EGROUP IS DEDICATED TO THE TRUTH, THEREFORE IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE UNDERSTAND THE OBSTACLES THAT ARE STOPPING THE TRUTH FROM BEING EFFECTIVELY PRESENTED. THE INFO BELOW IS VERY ENLIGHTENING ABOUT THE CURRENT WAR AGAINST TRUTH. THIS WAR INCLUDES THE SUBJUGATION OF VEDIC TRUTHS AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA'S CONSTANT AND ONGOING CAMPAIGN OF DISINFORMATION ABOUT INDIA AND THE WORLD'S ANCIENT VEDIC CULTURE. INSTEAD THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS CONTINUE THEIR CAMPAIGNS OF PROPAGANDA CONVINCING THE YOUTH THAT OUR ANSCESTORS WERE NOTHING BUT CAVEMEN, AND THAT HISTORY IS NOTHING MORE THAN AN ONGOING STORY OF LUST, GREED AND DEGRADATION. THESE THEORIES ARE DEBUNKED BY THE OBVIOUS EVIDENCES OF PAST GREATNESS. FROM THE PYRAMIDS OF EGYPT TO MEXICO, STONEHENGE, TIAHUANACO,SOUTH INDIA, ANGKOR, ETC. WE CAN SEE THE TRUTH THAT HUMANITY'S PAST IS GLORIOUS AND MYSTICAL. THE FACT THAT MODERN SOCIETY CAN'T EVEN DUPLICATE THE TECHNICAL ACHEIVEMENTS OF THE ANCIENTS, IS A SOBERING AND HUMBLING FACT AND IT PROVES THAT TRUE HUMAN CIVILIZATION HAS DECLINED DRAMATICALLY. WAR ON TRUTH The Secret Battle for the American Mind Australian academic Alex Carey once wrote that “The 20th century has been characterized by 3 developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate against democracy.” In societies like ours, corporate propaganda is delivered through advertising and public relations. Most people recognize that advertising is propaganda. We understand that whoever paid for and designed an ad wants us to think or feel a certain way, vote for a certain candidate, or purchase a certain product. Public relations, on the other hand is much more insidious. Because it is disguised as information, we often don’t realize that we are being influenced by public relation. But this multi-billion-dollar transnational industry’s propaganda campaigns effect our private and public lives everyday. PR firms that most people have never heard of (such as Burson-Marsteller, Hill & Knowlton, and Ketchum) are working on behalf of myriad powerful interests, from dictatorships to the cosmetics industry, manipulating public opinion, policy making and the flow of information. As editor of the quarterly investigative journal PR WATCH, John Stauber exposes how public relations works and helps people to understand it. He hasn’t always been a watchdog journalist, though. He worked for over 20 years as an activist and organizer for various causes: the environment, peace, social justice, neighborhood concerns. Eventually it dawned on him that public opinion on every issue he cared about was being managed by influential, politically connected PR operatives with nearly limitless budgets. “ Public Relations is a perversion of the democratic process,”he says,” I knew I had to fight it.” In addition to starting PR WATCH, Stauber founded the Center for Media and Democracy, the first and only organization dedicated to monitoring and exposing the PR propaganda. In 1995, Common Courage Press published a book by Stauber and his colleague Sheldon Rampton titled ‘Toxic Sludge Is Good for You: Lies, Damn Lies, and the Public Relations Industry’. Their second book ‘Mad Cow USA: Could the Nightmare happen Here?’ came out in 1997 and examined the public relations cover-up of the risk mad-cow disease in the US. What follows is an interview with Stauber that took place in his home in Madison, Wisconsin. JENSEN (INTERVIEWRER): How is the Propaganda War waged? STAUBER: The key is invisibility. Once propaganda becomes visible, it’s less effective. Public relations is effective in manipulating opinion-and thus public policy- only if the people believe that the message covertly delivered by the PR campaign is not propaganda at all but simply common sense or accepted reality. For instance, there is a consensus within the scientific community that global warming is real and that the burning of fossil fuels is a major cause of the problem. But to the petroleum industry, the automobile industry, the coal industry, and other industries that profit from fossil-fuel consumption, this is merely an inconvenient message that needs to be “debunked” because it could lead to public policies that reduce their profits. So, with the help of PR firms, these vested interests create and fund industry front groups such as the Global Climate Coalition. The coalition then selects, promotes, and publics scientists who proclaim global warming a myth and characterize hard evidence of global climate change as “junk Science” being pushed by self-serving environmental groups out to scare the public for fund-raising purposes. Another industry front group is the Hudson Institute, a prominent far right think-tank that espousing the view that global climate change will be beneficial! The Hudson Institute is funded by the American Trucking Association, The Ford Motor Company, Allison Engine Company, Bombadirer, and Mcdonnel Douglas, among others. The Global Climate Coalition and the Hudson Institute are routinely quoted in the news media where they promote their message of’ "Don’t Worry, burn lots of oil, gas and coal.” In order to confuse the public and manipulate opinion and policy to their advantage, corporations spend billions of dollars a year hiring PR firms to cultivate the press, discredit their critics, spy on and co-opt citizens’ groups, and use polls to find out what images and messages will resonate with target audiences. For obvious reasons, public relations is a secretive industry. PR firms don’t like to reveal their clients. Some of them, though, can be identified. Here is a list of just a tiny fraction of the clients represented by Burson-Marsteller, the world’s largest PR firm: NBC, Philip Morris, Trump Enterprises, Jonas Savimbi’s UNITA rebels in Angola, Occidental Petroleum, American Airlines, the State of Alaska, Genentech, the Ford Motor Company, the Times Mirror Company, MCI, the National Restaurant Association, Coca-Cola, the British Columbia timber industry, Dow Corning, General Electric, Hydro-Quebec, Monsanto, AT&T, British Telecom, Chevron, DuPont, IBM, Warner-Lambert, Visa, Seagram, SmithKline Beecham, Reebok, Proctor&Gamble, Glaxo, Cambell’s Soup, the Olympics, Nestle, Motorola, Gerber, Eli Lilly, Caterpillar, Sears, Beretta, Pfizer, Metropolitan Life, McDonnell Douglass, and the governments of Kenya, Indonesia, Argentina. El Salvador, the Bahamas, Italy, Mexico, Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Nigeria. INTERVIEWER: That list encompasses everything from biotechnology to genocide to jet-skis. STAUBER: In its latest reporting year, Burson-Marsteller claimed more than a quarter of a billion dollars in net fees from its clients. And it’s only one of a number of PR firms owned by the Young & Rubicom advertising agency. Other top-ten PR firms include Hill & Knowlton, Shandwick, Porter/Novelli, Fleishman-Hillard, Edelman, and Ketchum-companies that most of us had never heard of, but whose influence we have all felt. Burson-Marsteller alone has twenty-two hundred PR flacks-that’s slang for a public relations practitioner- in more than thirty countries. In its promotional materials, the firm says its international operations are “linked together electronically and philosophically to deliver a single standard of excellence.” It claims that “ the role of communications is to manage perceptions which motivate behaviors that create business results,” and that its mission is to help clients” manage issues by influencing – in the right combination – public attitude, public perceptions, public behavior, and public policy.” INTERVIEWER: WHY DON’T WE READ MORE ABOUT THESE HIDDEN MANIPULATIONS IN THE NEWS? STAUBER: Primarily because the mainstream, corporate media are dependent on public relations. Half of everything in the news actually originates from a PR firm. If you’re a lazy journalist, editor, or news director, its easy to simply regurgitate the dozens of press releases and stories that come in every day, for free, from PR firms. Remember, the media’s primary source of income is the more than $100 billion year corporations spend on advertising. The PR firms are owned by the advertising agencies, so the same companies that are producing billions of dollars in advertising are the ones pitching stories to the news media, cultivating relationships with reporters, and controlling reporters’ access to the executives and companies they represent. In fact, of the 160,000 or so PR flacks in the U.S. maybe a third began their careers as journalists. Who better to manipulate the media than former reporters and editors? Investigative journalist Mark Dowie estimates that professional PR flacks actually outnumber real working journalist in the U.S. END PART ONE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.