Guest guest Posted June 30, 1999 Report Share Posted June 30, 1999 Fed.s vs. Tobacco: Case in Point Today’s system is ill-equipped to reform the political and commercial corruption that plagues our nation. The U.S. government’s struggle with the tobacco industry offers an excellent case in point. Targeting tobacco maybe a little unfair. Whatever is said here of tobacco can be said of most any industry. Today’s system demands Machiavellian cunning or else one is to lose competitive advantage to those who do. Tobacco happens to have been making headlines these last few years. It therefore makes for an easier presentation. The stats & information are more easily researched while also corroborating what’s already common knowledge to most people. The following, however, maybe said of most any industry. ROOPA corrects all of these inequities no mater what the industry. The U.S. recognized the dreadful affects of cigarettes upon smokers. As expected, this led to a bevy of tobacco legislation: where it may be sold - away from schools; how it can be sold - in person, not vending machines; who can sell it - those with permits; who it can be sold to - those over 18; where it may be consumed - open air places; and how it may be marketed - no TV commercials or sports events, only print adds such as billboards and magazines. This micro-managing was further followed with reams of penalty specifications for those who failed to comply. The means and personnel for the implementation of these laws had to also be legislated. The "sin tax," taxes upon tobacco, had to be pounded out. How much to charge? What to charge for - smoking related damages or pet-projects like Special Ed. programs for children, tax cuts for folks, sidewalks in LA or federal debt relief? Then there is still the issue of how to cover all tobacco-related medical expenses and dispensing treatment for its addictions and ailments. We now have dozens of newly formed organizations, hundreds of new regulations, thousands of bureaucratic "watch-dogs," millions of incidents to process, and billions in added expenditure. This phalanx of government action is proving too heavy- handed for many American’s personal taste as it is too top-heavy for beating a billion dollar industry with the business savvy of tobacco multi-nationals. This is the Ben & Jerry cartoon of big-cat government bludgeoned by the far more clever mouse of multi-nationals. And so the results are obvious. Tobacco has recouped most of its lost ground from one of the most ambitious government actions ever undertaken against corporate harm. It was initiated in President Clinton’s first term with his appointment of a new director to the Food and Drug Administration. The federal government took on the tobacco industry with a vengeance. This led states throughout the country to begin their own lawsuits against tobacco to recoup smoking-related medical expenses. Legal discovery shed a mountain of new leads and information. The real damage was offered up - often illegally - by industry attorneys and scientists burdened by their own conscience and disgusted by tobacco’s tactics and harm. Within two years, the government had uncovered a global conspiracy of fraud and deceit. It included everything from silencing opponents and destroying damning evidence commissioned by their own scientists, to a global misinformation campaign on tobacco’s addictiveness and medical repercussions. This was only surpassed by its multi-billion marketing machine targeting everyone from women and minorities, to the poor and uneducated. Worse - they went after our children. Our kids remain helpless in smoking’s iron grip - usually for life and as often, killing them by the millions. The curtain had been pulled, not to a gentle old wizard, but to the face of a diabolical empire whose trade is nothing less than the maiming and death of every country’s most valuable, most innocent and most helpless. A half a trillion people, "alive today will die of tobacco" related causes. (From billboards by the California Department of Health) How the tobacco industry broke this mounting attack by the US is revealing to both the failings of today’s systems as well as the strength and urgency for ROOPA. Clinton’s campaign started off well enough. He brought states aboard and highlighted tobacco’s real cost: $100 billion a year. Overwhelmed, tobacco companies were considering to settle for $365 billion to be paid over 25 years. That was raised to over $500 billion with the revelation of an industry wide cover-up to mislead the public about tobacco’s addictive and medical consequences. The terms of this new settlement also included a growing list of restrictions upon the marketing and production of tobacco. Tobacco countered with everything they had. In the process, they showcased "the tricks of the trade" used to squeeze government favor against the public good. We have everything from savvy *legal manipulation and commercial *bribery, to the ace card of all ploys: political blackmail. Potentially, this may have gone as high as the President of the United States. The tobacco industry began with the obvious. They leaned on "their congressional representatives" to *kill the Senate’s "tobacco reform bill." On the legal front, their legal manipulations won court rulings that proved a further set back for the government’s case. In one, they had courts throw out such crucial legal tools as *class-action law suits. It’s not *cost effective for attorneys to pursue small cases. In another, the Food and Drug Administration was forbidden from regulating tobacco as a drug. In a third, the court dismissed the bulk of the cost for a state’s tobacco-related medical expenses. These cost were dismissed in the name of taxes already collected on cigarettes. The combined result: a convincing argument that states would face drawn-out court cases ending in reduced settlements. The states settled. The new settlement is for $200 billion over 25 years. This is in place of $2.5 trillion. That is the medical cost during this same 25 years at our present annual rate of $100 billion. Tobacco related medical cost will likely be significantly higher in 25 years from now. They’ve risen this last quarter century. The cost of medical treatments has risen 10% to 30% (1) in the last couple years alone. This $2.5 trillion may well double in the next 25 years to $5 trillion. Maybe more. In short, the tobacco industry is getting off for 1% to 5% of their total cost to society. Odd as this may sound, bringing tobacco to pay would be somewhat unfair. Few other industries pay for such cost as their products medical liabilities to consumers. Why single out tobacco? And so each culprit cries fowl as they hold up other guilty parties for justification. Tobacco, of course, did the same. In Atlanta, they defended themselves by pointing to gambling. Gambling is promoted by the state with impunity from all social economic damages wrought upon their clients - also running into the billions. Tobacco demanded the same immunity from justice. Demanding such equal rights is somewhat legitimate under today’s system - given the free reign of other culprits. We now have a system wherein two wrongs do make a right. It’s taken from the same traditions as the "honor among thieves." It maybe called corporate law. ROOPA will finally close the book on this whole system of "commercial morality." Starr & Tobacco Connection: Trillions Saved Like most political intrigues, the tobacco saga comes replete with a host of conspiracies. There are the ones reported by the media. For example, Gov. Gray Davis accused his Republican opponent during the gubernatorial campaign of "cozying" up to the tobacco industry with a favorable settlement while serving as Attorney General of California. This was a common Democratic mantra against their Republican contenders throughout the `97 campaigns. Then we have Kenneth Starr - Senior Partner, Kirkland & Ellis. Kirkland & Ellis is named as a primary law firm of the tobacco industry. Rarely reported. The Nation magazine (3/18/96) has printed a series of articles about this firm’s shady dealings. The most damning accusations is Starr’s appointment shortly after Clinton’s campaign began against the tobacco industry. The Monica Lewinsky portion of Starr’s investigation roughly coincides with Clinton’s announcement to sue the tobacco industry. Clinton’s prospective law suit is for $1 trillion dollars. It’s on behalf of the federal government’s tobacco-related medical expenses over the last 40 years. The federal Government’s Medi-Cal and Medicare programs have spent hundreds of billions on tobacco victims. This is in addition to the expense bared by our 50 states. The tobacco lobby had successfully killed Clinton’s congressional tobacco legislation. Clinton was furious. He responded by threatening this federal law suit. Kenneth Starr was there to greet him. The Republicans were the firing squad. President Clinton was effectively neutralized. Starr’s "independent counsel" has left Clinton a weakened president. This has translated into savings for the tobacco industry worth hundreds of billions of dollars - trillions actually. Tobacco is not the only industry to have benefited. HMOs, oil companies, nursing-homes, the gun lobby - among others, were all targeted in Clinton’s original political itinerary. This is another story, but the short of it, they all save from a now humbled Clinton. His subdued presidential agenda saves them trillions. This Starr connection remains only one of the more apparent and less sinister conspiracies, but they all elude to this same kind of corruption. People complain bitterly of government paralysis. This is commonly blamed on partisan politics or incompetence. Yet, government has a strange habit of grinding to a halt when slated for corporate reform and just as suddenly stirring into action for industrial de-regulation. The Republican’s threatened* to shut government down in the name of "budget reforms" back in the mid `90’s. This stunt back-fired. The public was strongly opposed. It only furthered Clinton’s own support just as Republicans were sweeping the national political scene. The Starr investigation proved far more effective. It brought government to a complete stand-still for all other legislative business but Clinton’s impeachment trial - for months. It offered the dual advantage of giving the semblance of government-at-work though doing nothing of the-people’s-work. All the while, it generated billions worth of negative publicity against Clinton. Interesting how it failed to gather the needed support for impeachment. The American people insisted he was doing "a good job" - in spite of the media blitz. However, it effectively stalled Clinton’s efforts for years, while eroding his public support to tackle such agendas as HMO or tobacco reform. Clinton was left with little option but to sign on to Republican demands for across the board deregulation. Everything took a hit from environmental and immigration laws to agricultural and employee safety regulations. Doing anything less would have left Clinton a "lame-duck" president - without political relevancy. Clinton’s ambitious domestic reforms have now been reduced to undeclared wars in third world countries - a favorite of the "military industrial complex." Congress just approved an additional $13 billion in added spending for the Pentagon’s Kosovo adventures. Not bad for a couple month’s work. War is much like the impeachment trial. War offers the semblance of government at work, though doing nothing of the peoples work. As for Clinton’s federal law suit against the tobacco industry… well, it’s now tucked away on "the back burner." In short, government paralysis, like media condemned politicians, seem to translate into corporate savings. This is not to say Clinton has done no-wrong. Just ask any comedian. Still, the end result of Clinton’s troubles is trillions in savings for multi-nationals. We’ve seen the President of the United States and attorney general’s from across the country laid waste by tobacco’s juggernaut. What chance do we stand at beating such corruption. Even if the tobacco industry was fully reformed, we then face every other industry - as powerful. How could we ever hope to reform all these rackets. We’ve gone from an embittered people to an apathetic society. Just see our election time voting record. 1999’s election turn-outs were some of California’s lowest. How often do we amuse ourselves watching those foolish enough to try and mend the worlds problems. Beating such corruption - impossible. Until ROOPA that is. ROOPA remedy’s all these inequities in one fell swoop. Simply. Effectively. Quickly. ROOPA: Shortcuts Corruption & Gov’t Bungling Some will view the tobacco case victory as part of every day government incompetence. Others will insist that such things are all part of some sinister corporate plot. Playing Detective Colombo to uncover some conspiracy is just more of the same old bureaucracy and politics that has marked our social, political bumbling. Does it really matter? Why bother splitting hairs to prove some conspiracy. The net result still remains: the tobacco industry is off scot-free for its economic cost to society. Worse, it keeps trillions in on-going SUBSIDIES for decades to come. Today’s system relies on the integrity of our politicians, the competency of our government and the righteousness of our courts. Does anyone see a problem here? Compromise anyone of these institutions and the whole system shuts down. Welcome to Washington. The tobacco case offers a great demonstration of this, but so does most any industry - from guns and Hollywood, to banking and the agri-business. All of them with trillions in subsidies if not out right extortion. Guns and HMO’s, for example, have won several court rulings exempting them of all monetary compensation, even when proven by their own admission to be a clear cut case of negligence and fraud. Such cases only flaunt the worse of our system. Look at the institutions of our government. Politicians are apt to be corrupt if for no other reason than the tens of millions demanded for campaigning. If too troublesome, politicians are vulnerable to blackmail: Clinton; they can be removed: Jimmy Carter; or even eliminated: JFK. (Discussed later in the book.) Courts can be finagled. It’s crafted to be. We call it lawyers. There’s always behind-the- scene plots. One of the more obvious is the nearly 1,000 judges appointed in the 12 years of Republican presidents from Reagan to Bush. The Supreme Court has been stacked with a "conservative majority." We had Democrat appointed judges before them. All of them tempering with the law within the confines of their own agenda’s and "ideology." As for relying on government competence, shall I say more? ROOPA does not rely on any of these institutions for its effectiveness. ROOPA bypasses all these snags - whether of government bungling or corporate manipulation. ROOPA does so by modifying the government’s power-to-forgive perpetrator’s damages to third party victims. In the case of tobacco, the victim is the American tax payer, health-care’s non-smoker premium payer and the out-priced uninsured - if not the addicted smoker. Forgiving a perpetrator without regard to its victim would appear to be a civil rights violation. Legal representation is the center piece of our civil rights. Injustice without amends is a mockery of those rights. No justice means no rights? Without justice, there is no such thing as democracy. Therefore, democracy is founded upon the Bill Of Rights. Those rights demand redress if violated. Am I reaching here? Well, it makes for an interesting discussion. One thing is sure: ROOPA embodies this principle of justice and recasts it into an exact science - down to the last penny. ROOPA is a precise "method-of-justice." This is done by transforming government from autocratic ruler, to accountant of the people. Like an accountant, ROOPA is also a neutral justice. Condemnation, posturing and intrigue are all eliminated. It will do for social justice and political reform what credit cards and ATM machines did for banking. ROOPA is the social "debit-card-of-justice." Automated, concise and easily accessed. Its primary function: to tally and charge one the total cost of their damages. The only debate: how much is the total bill? With tobacco: $100 billion a year. The tobacco industry won’t even contest this figure. Their only defense would be to bribe or blackmail our leaders. ROOPA effectively removes this option from the political equation. ROOPA leaves these costs right where they belong: in the court of those responsible. Here’s the formula for democracy: transferring responsibility back to the people. Let those responsible wrestle with tackling their own cost. Government’s role under ROOPA is but to insure one honors this responsibility. This system brings smokers and tobacco companies to redirect their focus. The industry can refocus its resources from beating government regulation, into fighting the costly ill effects of smoking. This is what tobacco companies should be doing. ROOPA effectively brings them to do it. ------ This is an information resource and discussion group for people interested in the World's Ancient Vedic Culture, with a focus on its historical, archeological and scientific aspects. Also topics about India, Hinduism, God, and other aspects of World Culture are welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.