Guest guest Posted August 30, 1999 Report Share Posted August 30, 1999 Antiquity and Continuity of Indian History (Part 4) Prasad Gokhale <f0g1 Organization: University of New Brunswick ----- --------- --------- Antiquity and Continuity of Indian History : Part 4 (From Swayambhuva Manu to Gupta Dynasty) --------- Index ----- 10. Mahabharat Era 11. Ramayanic Era 10. Mahabharat Era ------------------ The Mahabharat has exercised a continuous and pervasive influence on the Indian mind for millennia. The Mahabharat, originally written by Sage Ved Vyas in Sanskrut, has been translated and adapted into numerous languages and a variety of expressions and interpretations have been derived from it. Dating back to "remote antiquity", it is still a living force in the life of the Indian masses. European scholars have maintained that the events described in the ancient Sanskrut texts are imaginary and subsequently, the Mahabharat derives to be a fictitious tale of a war fought between two rivalries. The dating of the Mahabharat has been a topic of research for the past several years. Various dates have been estimated referring to astronomical recordings, lineagial references, archaeological findings and other evidences. Encoding of the astronomical recordings in the text, the only way to provide time precision upto a day, or even less, have been performed by numerous mathematicians in the past. From the Vishnu Puraan (4-24-108,113) it is known that the Kali Age started with Shree Krishna's leaving this world, at the end of the Mahabharat Age, the time for which is precisely known to be 2-27'- 30", February 20, 3102 B.C. >From internal evidences from the Mahabharat text, the coronation of Yudhisthir can be determined to be 36 years before Kaliyug, i.e., 3138 B.C. There are other pointers in the epic text itself that lead to the same date (Udyog Parva: 142-18). One scholar, Dr. Shriram Sathe, has evaluated the opinions of numerous experts on the dating of the Mahabharat, a majority of whom appear to concur with the 3100 B.C. dateline and therefore this time frame can be safely accepted. Among others, one scholar Dr. Patnaik has done commendable work in this regard. He has calculated the date of the starting of the Mahabharat War to be October 16, 3138 B.C. from textual references available in the epic text. However, many others have calculated dates many years before 3100 B.C. Dr. P.V. Vartak from Pune, Bharat (India) has shown, in his book "Swayambhu" that the Great War to have initiated on 16th October 5561 B.C. Greek records, like the ancestral links of Megasthenes to Shree Krishna, also provide some corroborating evidence to the 3100 B.C. date. Archaeologists have been successful in excavating Dwaraka, an important city during the Mahabharat era and Krishna's abode, which is said to have submerged into the sea around 2500 B.C. Mahabharat therefore precedes this date, and 3100 B.C. seems quite correct. The remote antiquity of the Great War leads to a paucity or unavailability of archaeological records. However, archaeological evidences found (Dwaraka, River Saraswati), inscriptions found at various places (Aihole, Belgaum, Nidhanpur), Greek records (Megasthenes), etc. provide interesting clues to the dateline of the Mahabharat. On one of the excavations obtained from the Egyptian Pyramid, dated to 3000 B.C, is found engraved a verse from the Bhagavad Geeta "vasanvsi jeernani yatha vihaya, navani ghrunnati naro parani" (Nava Bharat Times, 18-4-67). A tablet found in the Mohenjodaro sites depicts Lord Krishna and is dated to be 2600 B.C (Mackay's report, Part 1). This finding confirms two things: Mahabharat must have definitely occurred before that date, and that the people of the Saraswati-Sindhu culture knew of Lord Krishna. Also, according to B.B. Lal, horse bones, vestiges of the Ashwamedh, have been discovered at Hastinapur. There is further stratigraphical evidence at Hastinapur showing the flood level at the times of Nichakshu, sixth in line from Parikshit which has been mentioned in the Puranas. Thus calculating backwards, the date of Yudhisthira/Mahabharat can be determined. The dating of the Mahabharat is also significant in fixing the dates of the Vedantic (Upanishadic) texts, the famous Bhagavad Geeta and the Brahma Sootras. It is known that the end of the Vedic school of thought was marked by the composition of the Vedanta by Sage Ved Vyas, the illustrious author of the Mahabharat text (Rajgopalachari, "Indian Philosophy"). The basis of yogic school of thought, the Sankhya Yoga, has been mentioned by Lord Krishna in the famous Bhagavad Geeta discourse. This philosophy of Sankhya and other five schools of thought, definitely preceded the Upanishadic alias Vedantic expositions. All these schools known to have been inspired by the Vedic teachings, and were extant much prior to 3100 B.C. The Brahma Sootras, which propound the essence of the Vedantic thought, were also composed by the illustrious Ved Vyas during the Mahabharat Era. Some Samhitas (eg.Taitiriya) and Brahmanas (eg. Taitiriya) also fall into the same period of ancient history (Vartak, "Swayambhu"). Many other Brahmanas (eg. Shatpath), Samhitas (eg.Sushrut), Shreemad Bhagwat etc. were 'composed' after the Mahabharat War. The chronological span of Indian history finishes its ancient epoch with the Mahabharat War and 5000 years have elapsed subsequently into the "new" age. Since the age of the Mahabharat War is now quite correctly known, it may very well serve as a convincing benchmark to relate and date other and related events in Indian history. 11. Ramayanic Era ----------------- Ramayan precedes the Mahabharat by simple reason that the genealogies of the personalities in the Mahabharat can be traced back to those in the Ramayanic Era (Ikshwaku, Kuru) and not otherwise. Detailed genealogical connections of the characters in the Ramayanic Era to those in the Mahabharat Era are also known. Also, the Ramayan is known to have occurred in the Treta Yug(a), which antecedes Dwaapar period when the Mahabharat took place. However, the exact dating of the Rama's accomplishments has been unattempted and undecided as of today. However, it is suggested that it may have occurred 2 millennia before the Mahabharat (from available lineages) and 5100 B.C therefore becomes the approximate dateline. The Mahabharat contains list of kings and family histories of the heroes of that era (eg. Pandav), which when traced back can provide an estimate of Shree Ram's era. It is unfortunate that not much work has been done of the dating of Ramayanic events. The conservative date of that era falls to about 4500 B.C, about 1500 years beyond the Mahabharat age, which is altogether not impossible a date. Dr. Vartak, using astronomical recordings in the Ramayan, has reckoned Rama's birth date to be 4th December 7323 B.C., approximately 1800 years prior to the Mahabharat dateline which he calculates (5561 B.C.). Assuming his lineage determinations are a correct estimate, and knowing that Mahabharat occurred in 3100 B.C., an approximate age when the Ramayan flourished can be reckoned to be around 5000 B.C. Dr.Vartak's calculations have been presented in his celebrated book "Vastav Ramayan". Tilak summarizes (in "Orion") other researches stating that the Ramayan, from astronomical calculations, might have occured between 5000-6000 B.C. Some clues from Sumerian clay tablets, Isin and Kish chronicles which approximate the date of the first king (Ukhu == Iksh-vaku) of the first dynasty of Sumeria to be 8350 B.C. Waddell states that the names of kings in the above records remarkably tally to those of Indian Solar and Lunar dynasties. This suggests the antiquity of the Solar dynasty, and the genealogies can be followed to determine Shree Ram's Era. It is known from Shrimad Bhagvat that Shree Ram was (approx.) 75th in Ikshwaku lineage and that 60 generations passed between Shree Ram and Shree Krishna. Assuming 40 years for each generation (people lived longer at that time), and assuming the first Ikshwaku king at 8350 B.C, we see that Ramayan falls at about 5350 B.C and Mahabharat at 3000 B.C., the latter which is known. Ramayanic date therefore falls at about 5300 B.C. The deities in the Ramayanic era (eg: Varun, Rudra, Marutgan, Indra) are similar to those worshipped (mentioned) in the Vedas. These deities are altogether different from those worshipped during the Mahabharat time. Ramayan therefore must have occurred when the RgVed (one of its stages) was being composed. Tilak, Ketkar, etc. have calculated the last phases of RgVed to be between 6000-4000 B.C. Ramayan could have occurred during this time, or even earlier. Tradition informs that Mahabharat occurred at the end of Dwaapar Yuga and Ramayan at the end of Treta Yuga. However, if the Kali Era itself spans 432,000 years and Dwaapar two times that, how can then Ramayan occur in 5500 B.C ? One theory by Swami Yukteshwar (derived from Hindu texts) gives 4800 years for the Satya Yuga, 3600 for Treta, 2400 for Dwappar and 1200 years for Kali (cycle of 12000*2 years=24000 years). Dwapaar has 2000 years, with 200 years of "sandhee" period on either sides. Now, assuming Kaliyug began in 3102 B.C, the beginning of Dwapaar concludes to be around 5300 B.C. Subtracting the "sandhee" between Dwaapar and Treta, the end of Treta comes to around 5500 B.C., which is closer to Shree Ram's date estimated above. Incidently, the Ramayan has been conveniently linked with the premise of the aryan invasion of India, apparently, a story of the aryan conquests of south India; Rama being the ugly aryan engaged in subjugating Ravana's dravidasthan. In that case, Rama must have been an Iranian invading Lanka, i.e., Mohenjodaro and Kishkinda (the above of the Vaanara community) therefore may be placed somewhere in Pakistan. This construction of geography puts us in endless trouble. On the other hand, due to their dark hue, Rama and Krishna are classified as dravidians and strangely, dravid Ravana is known to the Ramayan to be a very intelligent Brahamana, a part of the aryan caste. Indeed, the situation becomes unnecessarily complicated and tortuous. Shri Rama of the Ramayanic age and Krishna from the Mahabharat age are considered to the incarnations (avataar) of the Supreme Godhead. They strove for the upliftment of humanity with a prime objective of establishing righteousness and morality through the globe. Like wise, Sage Buddha is also considered as yet another avataar, and the time he prospered is determined below. However, to determine the age when Buddha flourished requires finding dates of some other events in the course of history. The datelines of Maurya Chandragupta and his grandson, Maurya Ashoka, are considered in the following two sections. [ Continued in Part 5 ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.