Guest guest Posted February 12, 2000 Report Share Posted February 12, 2000 >OFBJP <OFBJP >OFBJP Editor <Editor >Saffron colored fires and a film named water >Fri, 11 Feb 2000 22:44:49 -0500 (EST) > > >SAFFRON COLOURED FIRES AND A FILM NAMED WATER > >Author - ANIL CHAWLA > >For most Hindus Varanasi or Kashi is the same as Vatican is to >Christians, Jerusalem is to Jews (and Christians) and Makka- >Madina is to Muslims. It can of course be argued that the concept >of treating a city as sacred is ridiculous and does not stand to >reason. Any city has its mix of good and bad. There can be no city >that has no crime or illicit sex or such other vices. Yet, neither >Vatican nor Jerusalem nor Makka-Madina will allow a film-maker to >make a film on the darker side of the city. The sentimental and >emotional appeal that the city has to millions of people will be hurt. >In fact, the cities are oldest surviving super-brands and a projection >of the evil in any of them can kill the super-brand and therefore the >city. It is unreasonable for any artist or film-maker to hope to be >welcomed by the city concerned while digging out skeletons from >the history of the city and attacking at the root of the existence of >the city. > >Deepa Mehta's proposed film "WATER" is a story about a portion >of the history of Varanasi that the city would like to forget about. >The film, as has been reported, is a story based in the year 1930 >and focuses on a child-widow in Varanasi who eventually has sex >with a number of men. There can be no denying that there could >have been such instances. The film-maker does not claim that >what she is portraying was the norm. The film-maker does not even >say that the practice is prevalent today. She accepts that she is >trying to talk of a dark spot that is no more and that could have >been more an exception rather than the rule. > >There have always been unconfirmed stories about illicit sex in >Vatican. Recently a newspaper published that the incidence of >AIDS in Catholic Priests in USA is four times than in general >population. It is not known whether the report is true or false but it >cannot be denied even by the Pope that among Catholic priests >there are some black sheep who are not living life as they profess. >This presence of black sheep cannot give a license to any artist to >go to Vatican and do a film with a story line about a priest having a >homosexual affair with someone. The idea of such a film will be >considered shocking and deserving condemnation by any sensible >man and not just by a Catholic. Artistic freedom and liberty of >expression cannot be allowed to hurt the basic belief structure >cherished as sacred by millions. > >Art, literature and film have to operate in a social environment and >cannot be removed from it. An artist can and possibly should be a >reformer. But in such a case the artist has to tread a cautious >path. His/her intentions must be honourable. The desire to reform >should stem from a genuineness of purpose and commitment >towards the goal. One cannot reform by hurting people's >sentiments. The process of reform needs patience, perseverance >and long term vision. Deepa Mehta claims that she is a just a film- >maker and nothing more. Her film's subject is a skeleton of history >that needs no reform because it has ceased to exist long ago. In >other words, she has refused to take on the mantle of a reformer. >Her intentions are purely commercial and she makes no bones >about it. Yet, there are some who defend her venture as if it is an >attempt to reform. > >Emancipation of widows has been discussed for more than a >century in India. Remarriage of widows has become well accepted >in India due to the efforts of various reformers who raised the >consciousness of Indian people on this subject with a lot of >sensitivity. None of the reformers had an eye on profits, none of the >reformers was a foreign citizen and none of the reformers tried to >make a big show out of the widows for foreign consumption. Deepa >Mehta has failed on all these counts. The mistrust about her is a >result of her own background, which will not be changed by >deleting a few words here and there in the script of the film. > >Non-Muslims are not allowed to enter Makka and Madina. Salman >Rashdie's book Satanic Verses did not directly point at any dark >spots of Muslim history, yet the book is banned in India and most >Islamic countries. Projecting dark spots of Islamic history will lead >to violent protests by Muslims and hence the artists, film-makers >and authors make no attempt to focus on the underside of Islamic >society. Christianity has changed a lot since the times when >scientists were burnt publicly. But even now there are limits that >one must observe while writing about the Church, priests and nuns. >Compared to Islam and Christianity, Hinduism is extremely >tolerant. Reformers are reasonably well accepted and have rarely >faced prosecution or threats to life. The proponents of artistic >freedom must realise and appreciate this. They must understand >that they will need to evolve a set of norms for self-imposed >discipline when focussing on aspects of Hinduism. Absence to do >so will harm their interests and will lead to the Hindu losing his >tolerance. In simpler terms, it can be said that here is a giant that >does not get offended easily and can take a lot of nonsense, but >please let it be that way by not hitting him where it hurts him most >unless of course you can convince him that he is being hit for his >own good. > >Unlike Islam and Christianity, Hinduism lacks institutions to give >voice to the collective will of Hindus. RSS, BJP and their sister >organizations (called collectively as SANGH PARIVAR) have often >tried to act as self-appointed representatives of Hindus. However >the Sangh Parivar has, in recent years, tried to become everything >to everybody. On one hand, Sangh Parivar has tried to project a >liberal, suave, internationally acceptable image, while on the other >hand majority of its members and activists come from fairly >traditional conservative families. The contradiction between these >two extremes became self-evident in the handling of the WATER >episode. The protests in Varanasi were headed and organized by >front organizations of Sangh Parivar while some prominent leaders >of the Sangh Parivar including some who occupy ministerial >positions in the Government of India have been trying to help and >defend Deepa Mehta. This has sent confusing messages to the >world and has undermined the reputation of the Sangh Parivar as a >coherent, consistent body. BJP and Sangh Parivar must realize >that they cannot simultaneously run with the hares and hunt with >the wolves. > >For all its follies, inconsistencies and internal contradictions, BJP >and Sangh Parivar need have no fears, since on the other side of >the fence, Congress has become so far removed from people that >Congress has ceased to understand and appreciate Indian psyche. >Strong emotions of people of Varanasi on the issue found >expression in the general strike organized in Varanasi on 7th >February. The general strike (bandh) was a total success. Ignoring >such expressions of the collective will of people, Digvijay Singh, >Congress Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh, has invited Deepa >Mehta to shoot the film on the banks of river Narmada in Madhya >Pradesh. No wonder that Congress is moving fast towards >becoming a dinosaur of Indian history. > >Politicians in India are so busy playing games of one-upmanship >that they have no time to observe, analyse and understand the >people's will even when the people's will is expressed loud and >clear for the world to hear. Deepa Mehta's proposed film has >evoked strong reactions but the reactions are being seen as fires >stroked by communalist fanatics. The fires raging in Varanasi are >seen with politicaly coloured glasses as saffron coloured fires. >Media joins the politicians in this rabble-rousing. There are learned >men and women who are preaching the virtues of free speech and >fundamental rights as well as advancing high sounding lofty >arguments while at the same time closing their eyes to the way the >world at large looks at such matters concerning faith. It is high time >that some of these learned men and women did some introspection >and opened their eyes to the realities in the world. True liberal >attitude, modern outlook and secularism consists in respecting the >sensitivities of all faiths for their sacred cities. No one has any right >to sensationalise and make money by rigging up controversies >regarding any sacred city - whether it be Vatican or Jerusalem or >Makka or Madina or even Varanasi. The world knows it and >accepts it. It is high time that people like Deepa Mehta, Shabana >Azmi, Nandita Das, Javed Akhtar and Shahrukh Khan understood >this simple rule. > >ANIL CHAWLA >Tel.: (91)-755-736901/736902 (Res.) >E-mail: snacks > > >10 February, 2000 > >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > >The above article is sent by HINDUSTAN STUDIES & SERVICES >LTD. MF-104, Ajay Towers, E5/1 (Commercial), Arera Colony, >BHOPAL - 462 016, INDIA. > >Publishers of the article are under no obligation to pay any fixed >amount. However any reasonable remuneration may be sent by >BANK DRAFT in favour of HINDUSTAN STUDIES & SERVICES >LTD. A copy of the relevant page(s) of the publication where the >article is published should be sent to the address given above. > >For articles circulated by HINDUSTAN STUDIES & SERVICES >LTD. during the past few months, please visit >http://anilchawla.homestead.com/ > >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > >ANIL CHAWLA is an engineer by qualification but a philosopher by >vocation and a management consultant by profession. He has done >extensive work on Constitutional Law. His "DRAFT OF A NEW >CONSTITUTION OF BHARAT" has been recently published and >well received. A copy of the "DRAFT OF A NEW CONSTITUTION >OF BHARAT" can be downloaded (in MS Word format) from >http://anilchawla.homestead.com/ > > > > >HINDUSTAN STUDIES & SERVICES LTD. >MF-104, Ajay Towers, E5/1 (Commercial), Arera Colony, >BHOPAL - 462016, INDIA >Tel.: 91-755-567485, 562665 (Off.) 736901, 736902 (Res.) >e-mail snacks >Please visit http://anilchawla.homestead.com/ > ____ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.