Guest guest Posted February 15, 2000 Report Share Posted February 15, 2000 Dear Dharmapada Das: Pranams, Prabhupada Ki jay. Thanks very much for last letter, let express to you. This is a apigraphe, for custionate the paper of this criticisers of Mohammed. Firts, it is a commentary of Drutakatma das. Second, I am Unersitary student of linguistic and letme said you that for a casual o chance and wander phonological comparation, it is not evidence of any class, for create or formulate historical facts. It is the best of the all mistakes in the theories about the Aryan invation. Please forgivenme, but you are no so much accurate if you get like a fact any cocontions coming from speculations. Please be more objective. Hoping that you don't be affect for this warned. your servant. Hare Krishna DAs. De: dino <dean Para: vediculture <vediculture > Fecha: Martes 15 de Febrero de 2000 4:21 PM Asunto: [world-vedic] Re: MOHAMMED ANTI-HINDU??????!!!!!!!! >About PN Oaks: > >I'll agree that his work better serves as a source of raw data, but his >logic grows on you. I think that the Rissiya etimology is worthy of >consideration, for example. > >Dharmapada Dasa > > >------ >This is an information resource and discussion group for people interested in the World's Ancient Vedic Culture, with a focus on its historical, archeological and scientific aspects. Also topics about India, Hinduism, God, and other aspects of World Culture are welcome. > >------ >eLerts! >Save cash today! >http://click./1/1413/4/_/15635/_/950652967/ > >-- Create a poll/survey for your group! >-- /vote?listname=vediculture&m=1 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.