Guest guest Posted June 21, 2000 Report Share Posted June 21, 2000 Excellent report on the orgins of Bagdad. thank you. The years of exceptional material posted on this conference should be taken together and printed into a book. Everyone on this conference should take an order for at least 10 copies. It's time we begin to share the gifts we've learned here with our friends and aquaintences in hard copy. Does anyone want to 2nd that. Any ideas how we can go about putting such a book together. Raghunatha anudasa In a message dated 6/20/00 10:13:11 PM Hawaiian Standard Time, vediculture writes: > > Message: 2 > Sun, 18 Jun 2000 13:45:44 -0300 > "dino" <dino > Baghdad > > Posted by Dharmapada from the book Our World Vedic Heritage by P.N. Oaks, > page 633: > > > > > > " Siddiqi's article informs us that the name of the city Baghdad, ( which > was a center of Hindu, Vedic learning ), itself is of Sanskrit derivation. " > Bagh " means God and " dad " means given by, hence, Baghdad means a city > given by God. This derivation belies the Muslim claim that Baghdad was built > by Caliph Al-Masur in 762 - 763 A D., and that it was scientifically planned > by him with the help of Indian engineers and architects. It is circular in > design and claimed to be the first of Muslim cities. What is meant by the > term first Muslim city is is that it was the first big, reknowned Vedic city > captured by Islam outside of Saudi Arabia. > > If Baghdad was among the first few cities of Islam it should have been named > Islamabad, Allahabad or Mohammadabad. How come that it was given a Sanskrit > name commemorating the Vedic name for God, Bhagavan? > > Secondly, if it was a city built with the help of Hindu engineers and Hindu > science and has a Hindu name, how could it be a Muslim city? > > Thirdly, we are told that the city was founded in 762 - 763 AD. Can a whole > city be planned, built, inhabited and named all in one year? [ Especially > back then! ] How many years does it take to plan a city, survey and acquire > land, develop it, order building material, raise buildings and populate the > city? > > And if Baghdad was newly created as a Muslim city, how was it an ancient > center of Hindu learning? > > All such cross-questioning reveals the utter falsity of Muslim claims; and > the utter gullibility of modern historians in just swallowing any Muslim > claim without even the least examination. Another very important conclusion > which emerges from the above Muslim version is that Baghdad, far from being > built in 762 - 763A D, was subjected to a terrible sack and general massacre > in that year. Almost overnight the entire populace was terrorized into > accepting Islam and from that day Baghdad was proclaimed a Muslim city. > Consequently, all its Vedic temples were advetised to be Muslim mosques and > tombs. This is a graphic instance of how, in Islamic terminology, ' built a > city ' implies conversely its plunder and ravage. > > History itself has been concocted. As everybody was forced to become a > Muslim not a sould was left to write about the terror and torture with which > Baghdad was transformed into a Muslim city. This is true not only of Baghdad > but of all land overrun by Islam. Everyone has been forever silenced and none > is ever allowed to tell the story of how entire regions were overnight turned > Muslim as though by a magic wand. This is proof that falsification of > suppression of history has ipso facto become a basic Muslim tenet. > Individuals and realms have been trained never to probe into how or when they > became Muslim, but merely to keep repeating the fanciful glories of Islam." > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.