Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 Someone posted that the word Arya is not Indo-European which of course is incorrect. The social structure that was later to become rigid and subspecialized int the caste system already existed in main outline during the Vedic perio, comprising the classes of brahmana, ksatriya, (or rajanya), vaisya, and sudra. The first three were deemed arya, whereas the sudras sere an ary non=Aryan, reerring to the darker skined indigenous elements of the population (the Sanskrit term for cste, varna, means color). Arya as a term for the Indo-European in group goes back to Indo-Iranian (Arayanam>Iran) and Proto-Indo-European, for it reoccurs in Celtic in the Indo-European Far West (Old Irish aire 'free, noble') and occurs as a comon noun in Hittite (ara 'social equal, peer'). Vedic society proper was thus tripartite, jcomposed of formulators, word manipulators, idea men, intellectuals (brahman originally meant roughly 'effective verbal construct, formula, prayer'), power types, warriors, royal entourage (ksatram 'rule, dominion, raj 'king'), an villagers, economic classes, tht is , herders, cultivators, artisan (vis- tribal village, vesa household=Greek oi-kos). (Puhvel, Jan, Comparative Mythology, p. 45). For THOSE who do read the Vedas and the Laws of Manu, Arya at the very least denotes a group, an ethnic group. BTW, for those in US, the entire Vedas are not readily available. I when to the U. and copied them in full. For those that study Indo-European religions see the many connections and realize that Greek, Roman, Hittite, Germanic, and Hindu all are derived from a common proto-IE source. Anthanarik Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.