Guest guest Posted December 16, 2000 Report Share Posted December 16, 2000 Title: Who demolished the masjid? Author: K.R. Malkani Publication: Hindustan Times Dec. 16, 2000 December 6, 1992 was a Sunday. Normally, on Sundays, BJP seniors do not visit 11 Ashok Road, the party headquarters in Delhi. There is no press briefing. But since kar seva on a huge scale was scheduled for that day some of us decided to be around. On the morning of December 6, I saw Messrs Bhandari, Kushabhau,Kidarnath and Ashwiniji there. Bhandariji had been just back from Ayodhya. He told us about the arrangements and the programme in Ayodhya for the day. I then retired to draft a press release on the basis of Bhandariji's account. I was still at it when Ashwiniji came and told me that the release would not be needed and went away. I could not make head or tail of it and so I went in to see what was the matter. They were all sitting stunned. Sunderlal Patwa had just rung up to say that the CBI had told the state Government that the Ayodhya structure was being pulled down and that Shiv Sainiks were believed to have done it. (The fact is that many trains, including the one carrying the Shiv Sainiks, had been stalled at Jhansi, Kanpur etc. because there was just no room in Ayodhya for fresh arrivals). That afternoon Bhandariji and myself met the press. We said that what had happened was most `unfortunate'. The BJP, we said, had endorsed the VHP demand for restoration of the ancient sacred sites in Kashi, Mathura and Ayodhya. But we had urged the respectful shifting of the structure stone by stone (for instance, to the Mazar of Mir Baqi at Sahanwa village in district Faizabad) as had been done in Egypt to save ancient temples from the Aswan Dam waters. And the Archaeological Department had prepared a plan for the purpose. Demolition of a religious structure, even if disputed, went against the Indian grain. Aitzaz Ahsan, Pakistani leader, quoted a Punjabi verse in his book The Indus Saga: Masjid dha de, mandir dha de; Dha de jo kuchh dhainda Ek bande da dil na dhaheen Sohna Rab dilan vich rahenda (You may demolish any mosque or temple, but do not hurt the heart of any man, for God lives in our hearts.) And December 6, 1992, had hurt many hearts. We in the Sangh parivar knew we had not done it. But we did not know who had done it. So we kept silent. Our opponents, and even the common man, could always say that we had wanted it gone, and we were there in huge numbers, so who else could have done it? We suffered this indignity in silence. Eye-witnesses have told me that leaders were addressing lakhs of kar sevaks out of sight, some furlongs away. Only a few thousand of them were standing by for formal kar seva, when about a hundred young men wearing a different head-band — and reportedly staying in a Faizabad hotel — tried to break the cordon of the police and swayamsevaks. They were thrown back. A second attempt by them was also repulsed. And then a couple of persons were seen on top of the dome. That changed the mood of some onlookers. The rest, as they say, is history. Shrikant Joshi, the private secretary of the then RSS Sarsanghchalak, Balasaheb Deoras, told the press that there was reason to believe that the dastardly deed had been done by RAW. Two years back, former RSS Sarsanghchalak Rajju Bhaiya said that some kar sevaks had lost their cool and started removing the plaster when the mayhem broke out. Sudarshanji has said that there was probably a bomb explosion. He has also referred to the dubious activities of Narasimha Rao's kitchen Cabinet. Gandhian activist Nirmala Deshpande has said that she knew who had done it but their names would be made public only after her death. She has also said that the top BJP leadership had nothing to do with the demolition but some lesser party-men had hired experts for the purpose. All these bits of information could be true. There is no contradiction between them. A heavy dome falling with a huge thud could sound like an explosion. The important thing is to go deep into the matter and find out all the relevant facts. Soon after December 6, the press had published a photograph — again recently reproduced — of Murli Manohar Joshi and Uma Bharti in excited joy on the occasion. This does not indicate complicity but a mixture of surprise and joy. Such a response has been described by Aristotle as `catharsis' — the purging of the effects of pent-up emotions and repressed thoughts. In a cathartic situation, the heart is bursting with contrary emotions and a person may laugh or cry — or do both, laugh and cry — and emerge the purer in the process. In criminal investigations, the rule is to see who stood to profit by the crime. And in the present case the needle of suspicion points unmistakably to the Rao Government. The BJP was becoming a serious challenge to the Congress. The demolition could be used to give the BJP a bad name. It could be used to dismiss the four BJP-led state Governments. And it would take away from the BJP a standing issue. Rao tried to confound the RSS, VHP and BJP. He used Chandraswamy to divide the sadhu samaj. He had promised in July l992 to solve the problem within three months and he had assured that there would be a court judgment by October l2. (It came on December 11, two months too late.) And in the 18 days preceding December 6, Rao had not contacted or consulted L.K. Advani, leader of the Opposition, even once. Obviously, he had decided on action — on a show-down. On December 6, the state Government was more dead then alive. And Rao in his wisdom had positioned over l6,000 soldiers in Ayodhya. What were they doing? Did they question men openly carrying heavy ropes, pickaxes and other tools? Was even a single person detained? No wonder even his friend S.B. Chavan (then Home Minister) holds him responsible for the events of December 6. Although Rao has much to answer for, his role would not constitute the whole truth behind December 6. In the last few years we have suffered several surprising shocks. Who, for example, stood behind the blowing up of `Kanishka'? Who master-minded the midnight air-dropping of weaponry in Purulia in December l995? The Bombay serial bombing was an act of war. It was supposed to be the `Muslim' reaction to December 6. Is it a fact that RDX consignments had been landed in India even before December 6? Was there a link between all these mysterious goings on? Is it a fact, as journalist Saeed Naqvi alleges, that on the evening of December 6, there was celebration in the Pakistan High Commission in Delhi? In his book Will Pakistan Break Up? Muneer Ahmed of Pakistan writes that in July l993, Pakistani President Ghulam Ishaq Khan told Nawaz Sharif: "The ISI is behind these (Bombay) blasts and I have got proof of it." He also told him that if the US declares Pakistan a terrorist State as a result of these ISI activities, he would hold him responsible. The question is: Who controls ISI? The Pakistan Government or somebody else? Did RAW have a finger in this bloody pie, as alleged in l992? In l996, the number two man in the Intelligence Bureau, Rattan Sahgal, was found having serious unauthorised relations with the CIA. Did the IB and/or its friends have a role in the events on December 6? The BJP does not have to accuse the Congress of unlocking the disputed structure. And Congress does not have to accuse BJP of demolishing the structure. We must know all the facts and not just go about bandying charges and filing fancy cases. December 6 was much too serious for that kind of frivolity. Perhaps the Government could seize and seal all files, films and tapes on the Ayodhya issue — from the day of the unlocking. These files could be submitted to a commission of three retired Supreme Court judges. And this commission could give its findings within one year. Let the country know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. ---- http://www.ofbjp.org ---- A worldwide community of BJP's friends, supporters and activists: Friends of the BJP - Worldwide: http://www.ofbjp.org/fob ---- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.