Guest guest Posted December 16, 2000 Report Share Posted December 16, 2000 India and Russia-I November 28, 2000 By Lieutenant Colonel Thakur Kuldip S Ludra (Retd.) No other country has ever attracted the strong sentiments that have been aroused in India with regards to India's relationship, first with Soviet Russia and now with Russia. Both the proponents as well as the antagonists are, even till date, evenly matched. While the opponents were and still are eloquent over repressive nature of the communist regime and how Soviet Russia considered India as a vicarious colony, they now talk of Russia as a decaying giant who cannot even feed its own people and betrayed India in connection with a signed agreement to supply to India seven cryogenic engines which she reneged on under pressure from the United States of America. The proponents, on the other hand swear by the helpful attitude of the Russian regime and how Soviet Russia had supported India on the Kashmir issue. The unflinching support during the 1971` Operations against Pakistan, as compared to the infamous pro-Pakistan tilt by the Nixon's United States of America is invariably highlighted. Again the opponents talk of how Shastri was coerced to return all the territorial gains made during the 1965 Operations and how India's case was dumped, virtually overboard by Kosygin, in his attempt to woo Pakistan. They also talk of the bugging of Shastri's apartment at Tashkent. The controversy rages on, to and fro unendingly. Most of these contenders forget that inter-nation relationships depend entirely on perceptions about their interests and policy aims derived from these interests. Ethics and sentiments do not have any place in such relationships. Historically speaking, India was ignored completely by Stalin, who considered Nehru and his non-alignment as unacceptable and pro-West. His perception was that Nehru was too much under the influence of the British. He had written off India. India was to be dealt under the classical communist approach of instigated labour revolution of the proletariat. However, as the Cordon Sanitaire, as envisaged by the Dullesian concepts tightened, Khrushchev, Stalin's successor, did a volte face and started wooing India.. Reservations, however, continued and just when India did need the delivery of the MiG21, in 1962, which had already been paid for, the delivery was delayed. Though they were eventually delivered, it was too late and well after the immediate need was over. Subsequently, as Bhuttonian concepts gained ground in Pakistan and their ties with the United States of America got put on the back burner, the Russian leaders, particularly Kosygin, felt that the Russians had a chance to get Pakistan into the Russian fold. Soviet Russia started wooing Pakistan. This , probably, was one major factor, though still not talked off, which encouraged Pakistan to launch its adventure in Kutch and again later in Jammu and Kashmir. The Russian, though ostensibly even handed, had a positively pro Pakistan tilt, which eventually led to the Tashkent Agreement, where India had to surrender all the territorial gains achieved during these operations. Between'65 and '71 the relationship between China and Russia deteriorated, while China was able to successfully woo Pakistan. Even more important China and United States of America also started coming closer. Suddenly the Cordon Sanitaire started tightening around Soviet Russia. This forced Soviet Russia to improve her relations with India once again. In addition, facing a severe crunch in the consumer industry she found India an ideal source of western type of goods and technology. India was also desperate for opening up new markets and found Russia an ideal solution to her quandary. She walked into the Russian arms by signing the 20 Years Friendship Treaty. This signing of the Treaty with Soviet Russia also secured India's Northern Flank, when the clouds of war were looming large over the Indo-Pakistan horizon. In addition, this increased the trade between the countries all payable in Rupees. Thus Russia got a wide range of consumer goods at exchange rate extremely favourable, while India got arms and equipment for which she paid in Rupees, an extremely weak currency in the international market. In spite of an extremely unfavourable exchange rate India was successful in maintaining a favourable balance of trade. This mutual Economic Advantage led to further improvement in relations and India started taking Russian help, in practically all spheres, for granted. Ostensibly, India found that all kinds of assistance, technological, scientific, commercial, diplomatic, as well as military equipment and supplies forthcoming. The situation was such that even the Indian Foreign Policy started getting influenced by the continued Russian support of the Kashmir Problem. In fact India had stared losing her Freedom of Action as Russia insidiously kept on spoon feeding India. For Russia the situation was very favourable indeed. Apart from her equipment getting tested under combat conditions she was also getting in puts and feed back that led to her improving the capability and the quality of her military equipment. She also benefited in geo- political terms. As Russia advanced into Afghanistan, in her final gamble threatening to strangulate the oil shipping lanes emanating through the Persian Gulf, she needed some one who could continue putting pressure on Pakistan. That Pakistan would be a base for any opposition and possible retaliation against Russia from the Western or rather American camp, was obvious to any perceptive analyst. Thus since 1971 India's relations with Russia had been cemented by the Mutual Economic Advantage, as well as the Russian need for assistance in her advance into Afghanistan. It is not that the assistance provided by India was active or material. However, the fact that India did not condemn or react adversely to the Russian move, forced Pakistan to keep looking over her shoulder towards India, all the time she was involved in Afghanistan. Thus we see that as Soviet Russia's antagonism against United States of America was the prime factor in her policies she had roped in India as her man Friday. This need for her was further accentuated when her relations with China soured. For India who, all this while needed a crutch to counter the faulty policies, economic, geo- political military, initiated by the Nehruvian set up, Russia was an important even a vital prop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.