Guest guest Posted January 10, 2001 Report Share Posted January 10, 2001 India and China January 9, 2001 By Lieutenant Colonel Thakur Kuldip S Ludra (Retd.) Napoleon is purported to have assessed China as a sleeping giant, which should be left sleeping, or the world would rue the day she woke up. China did wake up and very soon made her presence felt, when she took on the Americans and the Western World, with all their military might in Korea. She followed it up 10 years later when she gave the Indian Army a smart drubbing along the Indo-Tibet Border, both in Ladakh as well as in the North Eastern Frontier Agency now known as Arunachal Pradesh. India and China, together, cover nearly one third of Asia and their combined population constitutes more than one third of the world population. While Russia still has pretensions of a World Power, primarily on account of her holdings of Nuclear weapons, both China and India are emerging and trying to find their place under the sun. Of course as the present readings go China has not only stolen a march over India but is miles ahead in terms of military power, economic strength and her standing in the world pecking order. Both India and China are countries with ancient civilisations which have, more or less developed the existing natural resources, not possibly to their optimum but to a very fair degree. To achieve their ambitions both have had to resort to centrifugal economic policies and develop sources of raw material, as well as markets for their produce, outside the geographical limits of their countries. Here also China has stolen a march over India. China is the third largest country in the world. Yet it finds itself difficult to feed her own population which is well over one billion mark. The Western region comprising nearly two thirds of the total area is either a huge mass of towering mountains or a desert, where camel caravans travel for days without meeting a soul. With the greatest of stretching, not more than 20% of China is arable. The rest is too dry, too steep or plain exhausted. Mineral resources have also been exploited for centuries. However, the mountains of Central China do offer a scope for availability of fresh mineral resources and China is fairly well endowed with mineral wealth. China is located North of the 21st Parallel, with India Nepal, Burma Laos and Vietnam bordering her in The South. She extends to the North, well above the 50th Parallel, with Mongolia, North Korea and Russia as her Northern neighbours. On the East she rests on the Pacific Ocean, while in the West she extends to the 75th degree of Longitude, with Russia and some of the Central Asian states as her Western neighbours. In her population she has a certain degree of ethnic cohesion in that all he population is Mongolian in origin. In the eastern region she has predominantly the Han people. These are the people who reside in what has euphemistically called the Middle Kingdom. This is the region bordered on the North by the Great Wall, on the South by the Kuenlen Mountain Range and in the East by the Sea. Outside the Middle Kingdom is the Manchurian Autonomous Region in the North-east now absorbed by the Han Chinese, and the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region, in between Central China and Russian Siberia. Sinkiang or Xingjiang Autonomous Region in the West and the Tibetan Autonomous Region in between Kuenlan Mountains and the Himalayas are the other peripheral regions. All the Autonomous regions had been inhabited by people who were ethnically different from the Han and that is where the fault lines run in China. In terms religion barring Xinjiang, Kangsu and Chinghai where there is a large proportion who are Muslims who are also ethnically different from the Hui Chinese Muslims, the people are by and large either Buddhists or follow Confucian thought. Tibet, although primarily Buddhists has its own kind of Buddhism which is different from Buddhism practised in rest of China. While the Muslims of the Western region who are ethnically either Uighurs or Khyrghiz are so culturally different that they consider the Chinese rule almost colonial and resent the Hans presence. They have never accepted the Chinese halter and still do not accept what they consider as subjugation from the Chinese East. This is what is making them such easy recruits by Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence, in their Fundamentalist drive. Tibet is another region which has never accepted Chinese subjugation and are at present in a continuous state of revolt. Though in the last fifty years Chinese have been successful in transplanting a large number of Hans Chinese into these two regions. For India, Tibet is of particular importance. Till 1950 Tibet, protected by mountain ranges from all direction had led an autonomous existence, while paying lip service to Chinese suzerainty. That also, when the Middle Kingdom was in a position to impose her will. At other times Tibet drifted in its own independent orbit. China's strongest point is her cultural homogeneity which she has imposed with ruthless fervour. Unlike India where there are as many scripts as there are languages and even dialects, in China, barring Tibet and The West, there is only one script. In addition, practically all the literate people read and write Mandarin. A vast majority, nearly 90% of the Chinese live in the Eastern region. This is being sought to be rectified by large scale transplantation of The Hans into Xingjiang as well as the Tibet Autonomous Regions. This while generating ethnic conflicts, may eventually lead to a more culturally homogeneous people. In India on the other hand the effort has been to encourage propagation and development on ethnic, cultural, linguistic and communal lines. To quote Jawahar Lal Nehru, India's first prime Minister, "Let the Indians develop and progress in their cultural and linguistic ethos". This, while removing coercion tended to encourage fissiperous tendencies, particularly when political leadership, for its petty personal gains, incited the masses on the imaginary threats to their religion, language or culture. Politically, China has a Communist pattern of government. However, unlike the other erstwhile Communist regimes it has been pragmatic to have shelved the Communist ideology where its economics and economy was concerned. Thus while with the of collapse communist thought, as a result of Soviet Russia's collapse she considers herself as the sole champion of Communist ideology, it has been watered down so much with the market concepts that it would be difficult to even think of it as a communist economy. Yet where political regime is concerned she has still the communist pattern of dictatorship. Witness Tianmen Square where the agitating students were massacred by the government troops. When the Chinese Communists took over the regime in China in 1949, they were treated as her protE9gE9 by Soviet Russia. However, soon there were strains in their relationship. Initially China resented the patronising attitude by Russia who were wanting to treat China, more as a colony rather than a friend. The Russia on the other hand were wanting to access Chinese raw material for her industry and treat China as a market for her produce and finished product. Simultaneously Russia did not relish the idea that she would be expected to feed the teeming Chinese millions. The relations had deteriorated to the degree that the two even clashed over their boundaries. With the collapse, both geo-political as well as economic, of Soviet Russia, the situation has altered some what with Russia now actually wooing China, while the later is playing coy, even while taking full advantage of Russia's precarious economic situation. She is driving a hard bargain even as she is purchasing weapons systems selectively to augment her own technology. However, it must be understood that whatever the platitudes that are being mouthed, Russia and China are clashing economies. The sole assets that Russia has at the moment are oil and her capability to supply cheap, robust and simple armaments. She has a fairly big captive market for her armaments. Today, China is also entering the world markets with the same type of armaments. In fact the armaments that China is supplying are a modification, an offshoot, possibly an improvement of the Russian equipment. Thus the collision and clash. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.