Guest guest Posted February 25, 2001 Report Share Posted February 25, 2001 > > << Dean, why don't you share with us some of the info about > the Daitya? >> Mike Mott, Ok, I will. > > I second the motion! > > > > Was this character meant to be real or a plot flowing device. If > the latter, > > what was that "no eyes" business a metaphor for? Laura, Since you second the motion, I definitely will! Keep in mind that I have been reading the Bhagavat Purana, which is an original book of Vedic/Hindu lore, since the early 70s. When I read Etidorhpa, certain strong correspondences jumped out at me. Two factions of beings stand out in the Puranic presentation of life in the cosmos- The Adityas, descendents of Aditi, a demigoddess empowered by the cretor Brahma to gender pious prgeny, and the Daityas, the descendents of Diti, her sister, who created impious races and species of life. This faction is known as the Daityas. The spiritual Master of the Daityas is Venus, but not the one which we know of. The Hindu Venus is known as Shukra, the demigod of pleasure- he is a brahmin by caste, and has daughters, one of whom is named Devayani. Shukra himself is not really evil. One of the freat Vedic sages, Parashara, the father of Hindu astrology, writes in his astrological treatise Parashara Hora " Daitya Guru Shubha ": That the guru of the Daityas is benefic. Shukra is therefore also known as the Daitya Guru. The Daitya Guru is considered merciful because he always carries a scroll and pen in hand for originating religious systems and reformatory rituals and such to the materialists and demons. They are not known for following him very well. In other words, the followers of Venus are the demons in Puranic lore. And the demons are said to live in the lower planetary systems, lokas, or worlds. But it is difficult to tell whether these lower worlds are supposed to be planets below ours or worlds below our feet, or both. So Imagine how I felt when this underground devil type of character shows up and leads the man to experience various underground hells, this demon being some kind of follower of venus! As Mike Mott has pointed out, Etidorhpa is Aphrodite spelled backwards. In the book, hell is depicted as existing within some type of time dilation because is seemed to last an eternity, but only took seconds, and took place on some type of subtle, ethereal existence. That is exactly how hell is depicted in the vedic literature. And Etidorhpa depicts these hells as places where " conditioning " goes on, in thie subtle body, it seems. The Vedic literature describes this also, that the conditioning by torment prepares one for his or her future life according to deeds and karma generated in this life. It is described in Etidorhpa that one's subtle body takes on the form which the individual has generated according to his conditioning, starting in this life, and that one's material body can become like a shell around a subtle body which no longer corresponds to it, just as a shoe can hide a trampled and mangled foot with its exterior form, and hide the true nature of the foot. This is pure, unadulterated Puranic philosophy. I heard this same analogy in India from my Indian guru while he was lecturing on the Bhagavat Purana. So how did all this get written down in the mid 1800s in the book Etidorhpa? Is wasn't actually printed until 1895, but suposedly it sat for 30 years. That's why I wrote that article " You could Learn a Lot from a Daitya." http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index13.html It is the first one at the top. And that is why I tried to show the correspondences not only betwen the natural phenomena described, but between certain Vedic concepts and concepts inherent in the book. These correspondences are unreal, and it just makes me think that there is more to Etidorhpa than meets the eye. > While he does resemble various underworld forms from folklore, > and ufo entities in many regards, the "guide" from Etidorpha is > supposedly possessed of an unknown sense or heightened > awareness which is a result of his origin or transformation into > the form that he has....He 'sees' the particles with his very being, > and all is illuminated for him (symbolic of the Illuminati?). That he sees though he is eyeless just means that his very brain or even his very body can perceive on the ethereal or prana/soft particle platform and therefore, doesn't need eyes like we have with a retina which just perceives sunlight in a certain band. I don't think that an exteroir material body is important to him. I got the impression from the book that The-Man-That-Did-It laid his body aside to exist and experience on the ethereal platform ( It's a Brave New World ). In fact, that is what the book says. The Man just animated and re-occuppied his body to come to the surface in order to carry out his mission. The Guide's exterior body must be something like that. It is very funcional and suitable for underground environments, but I don't imagine that he is constantly limited by it, nor that he constantly occupies it: The Guide was quite a mystic. You Could Learn a Lot from a Daitya. Dharma/Dean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.