Guest guest Posted August 10, 2001 Report Share Posted August 10, 2001 I am posting this on behalf of Nandarani Evans <nevans; all comments, etc. should be directed to her. This is a response to Mahesh Raja's 8 August response to Tim. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Wed, 8 Aug 2001 21:18:18 -1000 (HST) Nandarani Evans <nevans letters Cc: news Women As Characterized I do believe that the times in which we are living are bringing everyone to an appreciation of women. It is an organic process, happening without anyone's ability to control it. However, Srila Prabhupada said many more negative things about women, over and over, than he did about gays or blacks. What gets me is that male dominated thinking assumes that because a woman literally accepts a man, that makes her less than the man. It does not; it makes her equal to the man, but in a different role. A deep and profound interconnection reflected from basic realities from the highest places as Srila Prabhupada himself experienced. Anything that says that women are not philosophically inclined and more materialistic than men, is false. The women I know are quite subtle and philosophical, and not particularly materialistic. It is some men who are unsubtle and insensitive to a very profound truth: that women and men are equal, though different. The men who are closest to me do not fall into that category. Who here is justified in saying that accepting is less than being accepted? And there is nothing wrong and everything right about love and acceptance, unconditional. Which is the essence of the female role. Why we make it less than aggression is beyond me. Women don't meet the top standard, but one must see them properly. Men likewise, and with no "preferred" or "superior" sex treatment. I keep reading about men going way off the track, recently. For example, a 23 year old housemate has repeated sexual intercourse with a 10 year old in her mother's home and videotapes it repeatedly. The mother found the tapes after the girl finally spoke up. News of men raping very young female children seems frequent in the news. That's one of the reasons I don't buy the papers anymore. The children don't ask for this; the man deliberately forces himself upon them: aggression gone wild. Lately I am seeing men helping with baby strollers! And they don't seem embarrassed. I've seen it two or three times in the last week. In traditional Cherokee society, men and women are on a par. There are no gender pronouns distinguishing between them, and men and women may do whatever occupational duty appeals: men may tend children if that is their desire, without loss of face, and women may join an elite corps of investigators and vigilantes, if they so desire. Hare Krishna. Note: Hare and Krishna Your servant, Nandarani Evans (Nandarani dd) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.