Guest guest Posted September 20, 2001 Report Share Posted September 20, 2001 What is the Mysterious "N Street" in Washington Three times in the last three years, certain high-placed Americans unofficially "advised" their Israeli contacts to mute the Israeli profile and presence in Washington forthwith and to stop badgering President Clinton to arrange for the release of Jonathan Pollard, who is serving a life sentence for spying for Israel. Pollard, they said flatly, would never be freed under any circumstances. The "advice" came in increasingly stringent forms, yet Israel chose to ignore it – both when Likud's Binyamin Netanyahu was prime minister and under his successor Ehud Barak. A senior Aamerican sources told DEBKAfile: "Make no bones about it, Martin Indyk is now paying the price for Israel's disregard. Someone in Washington is taking advantage of the President's impending exit from the White House to aim a single shot at three targets – Clinton himself, the First Lady and Israel. The emblematic link between the three is the US Ambassador Martin Indyk. Shooting him down eliminates the link." That source declined to name the high-placed Americans who conveyed the whispered warning, much less the parties who orchestrated he diplomat's comedown, but reliable sources confirm that the wire- puller behind the scenes is the semi-clandestine, unofficial power behind the highest of Washington's thrones known to the initiated as "N Street". * "N Street", a street cutting through the heart of Georgetown, actually applies to a wedge of cityscape delimited in the South by the Potomac, in the West by Key Bridge and 35th Street, in the North by Dupont Circle and Connecticut Avenue, and in the East by Washington Circle and Foggy Bottom. It is the home of a certain kind of power-broker: the old intelligence and state horses, who once lived in its very comfortable town houses, but have since moved out to the suburbs. However they still haunt the clubs, restaurants and bars of "N Street, from which they keep their artful fingers in every pie in the US capital. Though invisible on the surface, their reach is everywhere. Here are the behind-the-scenes king makers and breakers, the equivalent of England's Old Boys' Network and Europe's Old Guard. Most are officially retired officers of foreign and military intelligence agencies, such as the National Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency and Naval Intelligence, as well as the CIA and FBI, who spin their arcane schemes in those Georgetown mansions, bars, restaurants and on privately-kept squash courts. In these discreet haunts, the "wise men" of "N Street" consult quietly with their successors in the senior ranks of the CIA and the FBI, some of whom have gone on to top positions in other fields to become international lawyers, senior corporate directors, global bankers, or in the policy-making level of government, secretaries of state, defense or energy. The men of "N Street" sit in separate groups in the quiet corners of their watering holes, none interfering in the business of their fellows. Each "represents" the interests of some important business sector, such as aeronautics, automobiles, chemicals, arms, computers, oil, banking, finance and Wall Street. Their influence is manifested in informal ways quite separate from the lobbies operating on Capital Hill. Their combined influence outstrips that of individual government departments and is certainly more lasting than that of the White House, although the men of "N Street" fight shy of putting this strength to the ultimate test unless convinced that the White House incumbent is falling down in his main duty: preserving the United States standing as superpower number 1. Failing a national crisis, the various factions of "N Street" also tend to avoid concerted action as a single group. Therefore, when they decided in early 1997 to join forces against Israel, the impact was extremely painful for their target. Among the numerous motives for their antagonism, but DEBKAfile will refer only to the most pressing. At that time, "N Street" was dead set against Binyamin Netanyahu becoming prime minister of Israel – not out of personal antipathy as his Likud fans often complained; "N Street" is not as a rule moved by emotions – but because during the time he served as Israel's UN Ambassador he went around arguing to every American he met that Israel must for its own good downgrade its strong political, security and economic affinity to the United states. Another reason for their disapproval was his arrogant, almost condescending, manner towards President Clinton. But Netanyahu's most egregious mistake, as far as "N Street" was concerned, was his appointment of the Canadian-American Jewish millionaire Edgar Bronfman as the single representative of the Jewish world and the State of Israel in the Holocaust compensation negotiations with banks and industries in Europe, especially in Germany and Switzerland. Little of this chapter is known to the Israeli public to this day. In this case, "N Street"'s wise men were moved mostly by domestic political considerations. Bronfman is one of Hillary Clinton's closest cronies and through him Netanyahu hoped to gain a privileged foothold in the White House. He was oblivious to the enmity between "N Street" and Hillary Clinton. Those powerful veterans, determined at all costs to cut her close circle down to size, regarded Netanyahu's favoritism of Bronfman as inimical to their interests. What saved the Likud prime minister for a time was the Levinsky affair, which distracted "N Street"'s attention to a more pressing matter, the campaign in the Senate to have the President impeached. Then, in 1998, Netanyahu was defeated at the polls and replaced as prime minister by Ehud Barak. However, for "N Street", the Israel nuisance became if anything more acute, because the new prime minister relied heavily on his relationship with Edgar Bronfman and Hillary Clinton as his power base in the US capital. One of his earliest actions was to ask President Clinton, on the advice of his two American friends, to appoint Martin Indyk ambassador to Israel, as a means of cementing his ties with the White House. The President hastened to grant the new prime minister's request and "N Street" took careful note. What they saw now was Netanyahu's arrogance and cheek being replaced with the brash airs of self-importance evinced by the Israeli members of the Barak and Indyk packs. Indyk himself was never close to "N Street". On his arrival in Washington in the early eighties, he put many backs up among the local elite. He had come from a senior position in Australian intelligence as deputy head of its Middle East Department and was regarded in Canberra as a rising star. All of a sudden, in the middle of a meteoric career, he got up and moved to Washington. His wife was promptly put in charge of cultural affairs at the Australian embassy there. "N Street" was deeply suspicious of the newly-arrived Australian couple and could not understand why so senior a man in Australian intelligence would abandon a brilliant career and be willing to start afresh in the United States. This mistrust was accompanied by certain remarks about his Jewish descent and country of birth, Britain. Many members of the "N Street" community – especially the intelligence veterans – are not exactly friends of Jews or in love with British intelligence. Strangely enough, some have never come out of the traumas they suffered in the fifties and sixties from the betrayals of the British defectors, Phlby, Burgess, MacLean and Blake. When Israel failed to heed the veiled threats about the conduct of its representatives in Washington, N Street went into action in its customary surreptitious manner. Defense Secretary William Cohen, after much persuasion, finally agreed to impose an unofficial embargo on the Pentagon's relations with Israel and its defense industries (See DEBKAfile Archive: An Israeli Diplomat in Washington: Bill Cohen Orders a Pentagon Embargo AgainstIsrael – August 15, 2000). When that move had no effect, N Street turned its attention to Ambassador Indyk and his close relations with the Clintons and the Barak coterie. Here they dug out a suggestive parallel from the past. Was not the traitor George Blake a Dutch Jew named George Bechar? And how did an newly-arrived foreigner, whom no one had heard of outside parts of US intelligence, come to be the bosom friend of the Clintons at a time when they themselves were local politicos who had yet to make their name. His attaining an important position in the couple's innermost circle could not be fortuitous. This was the point at which the men of "N Street" addressed the Israel factor. As deputy head of Australian Intelligence's Middle East Department, and later head of a Middle East think tank in Washington, Indyk came to cultivate close ties with Israel's political, intelligence, financial and social elites. Many of its members regard themselves as "special friends of Indyk" and since they spend long periods in the US, they take the liberty of making themselves very much at home in America's power centers, embracing Indyk's connections in the Clinton camp as their own. "N Street" finds this phenomenon extremely disturbing. Washington's ruling caste is closed, exclusive and scrupulously stratified. Its members are less than delighted to see Israelis making free of Pennsylvania Avenue and the streets of Georgetown in their capacity as "friends of… " The more conspicuous their presence, the more pressing was the determination in "N Street" to wind that presence down. They acted again, this time sending out to those "friends" a hint too broad to ignore, namely Ambassador Indyk's suspension pending a security investigation against him by the FBI. DEBKAfile 's American source put the situation in a nutshell: "Martin Indyk is a sort of hostage. The more his Israeli friends parade their White House connections and keep up the pressure on Clinton to get Pollard freed before he leaves office, the worse it will be for Indyk." Earlier, DEBKAfilesources in Washington reported the United States government is preparing a list of Israelis for the FBI for questioning in connection with its security investigation against the suspended US Ambassador. That list runs to dozens whom FBI agents hope to interview in Israel as soon as possible. According to two precedents – Irangate and the Jonathan Pollard inquiry - those Israelis have the right to refuse to be questioned by the FBI and decline to answer certain questions. In any case, an Israeli judge will preside over the procedure. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and the US State Department are doing their best to play down the invstigation, presenting it as just another breach of the security regulations prohibiting the transfer of classified material to unclassified computers of the kind plaguing the State Department of late. At the same time, Mrs Albright, during a briefing at the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee Tuesday, disclosed that the case was under examination with the Senate Intelligence Committee. This places it in a far graver light. It is also learned that the Committee Chairman, Richard C. Shelby, is giving the investigation his personal attention and has asked the Secretary of State to hand all the relevant data directly to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.