WTC Collapse Impossible,says designer 6 days before 9-11

[Guest guest]

The structural engineer who

designed the WTC Towers explained how the towers were

designed to withstand a hit by a commercial jet -- and he did explain this to

an international coalition on Terrorism in Frankfurt, Germany on the

Wednesday before the 9-11 event.

 

Four planes that were supposed to go to particular

destinations did not go

to those destinations.

Three of the planes hit buildings. One of them crashed

in a field in

Pennsylvania.

 

No ones knows what happened because EIGHT (8)

indestructible black boxes (2

 

on each flight) were destroyed or reportedly damaged

beyond possible

restoration. Guess that is why they are referred to as

indestructible. The

crash in Pennsylvania did not even cause an explosion.

Even if it had, the

boxes are designed to withstand twice the maximum heat

that can be

generated by a jet fuel fire. Why didn't they show us

the destroyed boxes?

 

Do you think the guys who actually found them would

talk to anyone? Or are

they still alive to discuss what THEY saw with their

own eyes? Paper

passports of two (2) of the alleged hijackers survived

just fine and were

supposedly found in the burning ruble of the Pentagon

crash, and another

three blocks from the WTC.......three blocks. I would

bet good money to

anyone who thinks he could contrive a way to launch a

passport a distance

of three city blocks.

 

We have been told that seven cell phone calls were made

from the planes.

Not ONE of the callers described the hijackers as

Arabic, Saudi, Muslin,

Iranian or anyone from the Middle East.

 

Barbara Olson, writer, author, investigative reporter,

famous commentator,

attorney, and wife of the Solicitor General of the

United States (Mr. Olson

being George W's lawyer who argued before the Supreme

Court in Bush v.

Gore), did not describe the hijackers to him as being

from the middle east.

She was trained to be observant and mentally record

details, yet there has

been no report that she described the hijackers at all.

Are we to believe

she didn't describe them, or did she describe them and

we just aren't being

told? And if we aren't being told, is it because her

description doesn't

match the profile being fed to us?

 

And are we to believe the Solicitor General forgot to

ask her to DESCRIBE

the criminals? I guess we are to accept that this is

obviously an

insignificant "fact" that the most high-powered-lawyer

in the United States

would understandably forget to ask.

 

>From almost the moment it happened it was dubbed an

ATTACK ON

AMERICA. I

have videotape referring to it in that manner BEFORE

George W made his

speech in the Florida elementary school and went

prancing across the

country. It has NEVER been referred to as an Attack on

the United States.

In everything the federal government does from a legal

perspective -

writing and executing laws, prosecution -- everything

is the based on an

entity known as the United States. But on September 11,

2001 and every day

since, the criminal acts were an Attack on America. Why

are we suddenly

America, not the United States?

 

The Pentagon is NOT in the District of Columbia -- it

is in Virginia. That

is a FACT and it would take volumes to explain its

significance. I will

give you a hint. D.C. is the United States. Virginia

and New York are

American States. I am doing some research to find out,

but I do not believe

that the soil under the Pentagon was ever ceded by

Virgina to the United

States. I know for CERTAIN that the Arlington National

Cemetery has NOT

been ceded because a federal prosecution for larceny in

the Cemetery was

dismissed a few decades back by a federal district

court because the

federal government has no territorial jurisdiction

(United States v. Penn,

48 F. 669 (E.D.Va., 1880). The State of Virgina

prosecuted the felony. That

area was first ceded to the federal government for the

seat of government

in 1791 along with land on the east side of the Potomac

ceded by Maryland

for the same purpose.

Collectively the 10-mile-square was to be the seat of

government as

specified in 1.8.17 of the federal constitution. Thomas

Jefferson and the

Virginia Legislature took it back (22 square miles)

after Jefferson and

Washington had a serious rift over civil rights issues

in 1792 (making

Virginians license carriages and wagons and carry

identification on their

person). The place where the Pentagon and the Cemetery

are situated was the

General Robert E. Lee Plantation and Estate. It was

sold to the federal

government after the Civil War.

 

Had the planes hit a military installation that had

been ceded (federal

territory) or anything in DC (78 square miles of

federal territory ceded by

Maryland under 1.8.17 of the federal constitution in

1791) it would

immediately be considered and ACT OF WAR, not

terrorism. Pearl Harbor was

a

military base. Hawaii was federal territory. That

ATTACK was an ACT OF

WAR.

In this instance none of the planes hit anything in

federal territory.

 

The soil was American soil of two of the States which

united to form the

United States of America and to create the military

government known as the

United States that would protect America. Hence, Attack

on America.

 

BATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms) agents

have been walking

around all over the ruble for two weeks. Why?

 

More defense systems were disabled than can even be

listed. And the media

are NOT talking about THAT.

 

When OKC was bombed, all we heard for more than a week

was Osama Bin

Laden,

Osama Bin Laden. Then they pinned it on a guy that they

said was driving a

Ryder rental truck.

 

They arrested McVeigh, according to news reports, 2

hours after the

bombing, driving south on Interstate 45 toward

Dallas......barefoot, no

shirt, plates expired, no driver license, speeding,

with a loaded .45

caliber automatic on the front seat. Just exactly what

you would expect

from someone who had just blown up an 8 story building

with a fertilizer bomb.

 

>From that moment on, they called OKC a terrorist act.

Without McVeigh they

had no terrorist. We still, to this day, do not know

what McVeigh was

supposedly trying to influence the civilian population

to do, or how he was

supposedly trying to influence government policy....

 

By definition this was NOT a terrorist act (attached as

PDF file). But the

media spin is NOT based on FACT or LAW.

 

See Attachment: PDF of definition of ACT OF TERRORISM

from Black's Law

 

Dictionary, Abridged 6th Edition -- adopted word for

word by Congress

codified at 18 USC § 3077. (You will need Acrobat

Reader to download and

read Black's Law Dictionary's legal definition of

"terrorism." If you

cannot download it, email Widowmaker and he will send

it to you in email

form).

 

Do you really think that a few 120 pound

middle-easterners overtook eight

pilots, and their crew members and passengers, using

razor-blade boxcutters?

 

Do you really think a commercial pilot would give up

his plane under threat

from ANYONE with a boxcutter? How many hijackings have

you ever heard of

where the hijackers brought their own pilot? And four

times in one day?

 

And if you were going to do this deed, wouldn't you

have a driver's license

in your own name, get your pilot's license in your own

name, and leave your

calling card everywhere you went, being rude and

obnoxious so everyone

would notice you?

 

Explain to me how all of the defense systems were

disabled? How did four

planes, that were not on their computerized flight

paths, fly around for

more than an hour and a half without alarms going off

all over the place?

When their altitudes and positions CEASED TO BE VISIBLE

ON RADAR,

why

weren't people (air traffic controllers) alarmed?

 

As close as Boston and Dulles are to D.C., why would

disappearing planes

NOT be a cause for alarm? Why was it more than an hour

AFTER the WTC

crashes that fighters were scrambled? Was the Air Force

sleeping at 7:45 AM

on a Tuesday morning when the planes were supposedly

hijacked, and deviated

from their designated flight paths?

 

Are we supposed to believe that when a transponder is

turned OFF that no

one is alerted that the plane is no longer being

tracked by altitude; and

that such a thing could occur to four planes almost

simultaneously in the

same geographical region, dangerously close to the seat

of government, and

NO ONE was alerting the media, the defense department,

or anyone?

 

Am I supposed to believe that no one even had a clue

for an hour and a half

from the time the first plane left its flight plan

until smoke started

coming out of a WTC tower? And when the first plane hit

the tower, no one

knew that three other planes were missing, and thought

it prudent to call

the media or government officials and tell them that

three other planes

were missing and that other locations might not be

safe?

 

I have talked to three pilots who have told me in their

own words and

understandings that what we are being told happened,

could NOT possibly

have happened.

 

What I DO KNOW is that we are not hearing much TRUTH.

And 110 story

buildings do NOT collapse because a plane hits them.

The second plane

nearly missed the building, only going through the

corner. Most of the fuel

burned in an outside explosion. It collasped first,

long before the tower

that the plane completely entered. The refined Kerosene

(a/k/a jet fuel)

burned up fairly quickly. The stuff burning from that

point on was desks,

paper, plastics, carpet, etc. That fuel did not

generate 2000-degree heat

that would compromise 6 tubular steel columns in the

center of the building

designed SPECIFICALLY to keep the building from

collapsing if hit by a

Boeing 707 that, because it was older and less

efficient, carried MORE fuel

that the 757 and 767 that hit the towers. The

structural engineer who

designed the WTC Towers explained how the towers were

designed to

withstand

a hit by a commercial jet -- and he did explain this to

an international

coalition on Terrorism in Frankfurt, Germany on

Wednesday before the event.

 

And 53 minutes after Tower 2 was hit the tower just

imploded because it was

on fire? Yeah right! I discussed this with a structural

engineer who

investigated a HOTEL in Los Angeles that he said was 30

stories and it

burned from the ground floor up. It burned for nearly a

week. The fire

totally destroyed everything on all 30 floors. The

estimated temperatures

were 2200 degrees because of the natural gas and other

fuel that was the

catalyst for the fire.

 

The concrete and infrastructure did not budge. It cost

more than a million

dollars to TEAR IT DOWN. The 30 floors above the first

floor did NOT cave

in on the first floor when the support structure go

hot. And he reviewed

the architecture on the WTC and said the type of steel

and the type of

construction for the WTC was double the strength of the

LA hotel.

 

Just like in OKC, people reported hearing multiple

EXPLOSIONS before the

WTC collapsed. I have video of people who were

interviewed after the

collapses and they said they heard a series of

explosions (not floors

collapsing) and then the buildings came down. The media

dismissed it as

exploding main gas lines. Gas mains on the 104th floor?

Yeah right!

 

We know that there would NOT be any safety mechanism in

place that would

have shut off gas flow throughout the buildings in the

case of fire -- 53

minutes after a plane hit the building. Guess it was a

big gas valve and it

could not be vented to the outside air after it was

shut off. If that is

true, I have better safety measures in my own house

than the WTC had.

 

And why would they need safety mechanisms in place? It

isn't like anyone

has ever tried to blow up those same two towers before.

 

 

The strength of the WTC towers was in the 6 Tubular

Steel Columns in the

CENTER of the buildings, not the steel structure on the

outside like most

construction. The buildings were literally, according

to the builder,

designed NOT to pancake in the event of a Boeing 707

crashing into them.

But they collapsed. It took 53 minutes for Tower 2 and

88 minutes for Tower

1 -- to simply COLLAPSE. Excerpts of his speech in

Germany were posted to

the internet five days before the planes hit the

towers.

 

My take? Americans are not very bright. Americans don't

think. They accept

what they are told. They don't TEST what they are told.

They are lazy, and

naive to the point of being undeserving of liberty. And

for that reason

they will sacrifice liberty for what they perceive to

be security. That is

exactly, in fact, the genesis for the federal

government.

 

The States gave up their RIGHTS in exchange for

perceived security. And as

long as the talking-heads can convince the general

public that the federal

government can PROTECT THEM, the sheeple will

patriotically give up every

right they have if it makes them feel safe -- while

singing GOD BLESS

AMERICA.

 

Software © 2001 Prospero Technologies Corporation. All

rights reserved.

 

 

Here, there, or in the air!

Teno Groppi

God & Country Center

http://www.baptistlink.com/godandcountry/index.html

 

 

 

Go do it OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM!

 

Eccl 8:11 Because sentence against an evil work is not

executed speedily,

therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in

them to do evil.