Guest guest Posted October 22, 2001 Report Share Posted October 22, 2001 In 1879 a revolt in the Egyptian army was suppressed. Two years later Colonel Ahmed Arabi,with the support of some army officers and religious leaders, took arms against the British interference in Egyptian affairs. In London, Gladestone Ministry decided to send an army to destroy "Arabi's war of liberation". In September 1882, Wolseley, the Adjutant General of the Army, met a tough resistance at the battle of Tal-el-Kabir, about halfway between the Suez canal and Cairo. However the British forces carried the day and Arabi was transported to Sychelles. In 1883 British secured control of Egypt and continued its colonial occupation despite the fact that it was part of the Turkish Empire. During Arabi's uprising, there arose in Sudan a religious leader Al Mahdi (Mohammad Ahmad). He did what no one else before him had been able to do. He united the tribes and inflicted series of defeats on Egyptian troops sent to capture him. Soon the dervishes of the Mahdi of Sudan got complete control of all the Sudan West of Nile. The British chose Charles Gordon to fight against the dervishes. Gordon had made a name in China where he crushed the Taiping Rebellion of a Chinese religious leader who claimed to be the Prophet of God, the son of God, the Tien Wang, the Celestial King and the younger brother of Jesus. He like the Mirza failed in his academic career and turned towards politics. In 1864 Gordon captured Nankin and crushed the Christ's uprising. In the face of mounting military pressure from the Mahdi's forces Gordon withdrew garrisons but himself held on in Khartoum against the British orders until in 1885 the city was conquered by the followers of the Mahdi of Sudan. He was killed by the dervishes. In 1896, after a period of ten years, Kitchner started his expedition to forcibly bring the Sudan under British control . The Mahdi's war in Sudan excited dangerous fomentation in Arabia and Syria. The Muslims of India also felt satisfied at the humiliating defeats of the British forces. They revered and respeated Mahdi of Sudan, sent him letters and looked to him as a saviour of nations. It was also a common belief in India that the Mahdi of Sudan might conquer the whole of Africa and ultimately India. At the time of compiling the Braheene Ahmadiyya (1880), Mirza believed that Jesus was alive and would descend from heavens.In 1891 he peoclaimed himself to be the Promised Messiah through one of his revelations and announced the natural death of Jesus Christ in his books Fateh Islam, Tauzih-e-Maram and Azala-e-Auham (1891) He argued that the second advent of Jesus Chrisit was in fact a coming of another person who sould have the spiritual characteristics of Jesus Chrst . He held that Jesus did not die on the cross but escaped and came to India in order to preach to the descendant of the lost ten Tribes in Afghanistan and Kashmir Subsequently, he announced that the "tomb" of Jesus had also been discovered in Srinagar, Kashmir. It was claim that Kashmiris and Afghans were the descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel. The main thrust of the whole theory is on the assumption that in 721 BC Ten Tribes of Israel were lost and settled in Eastern countries, specially in Afghanistan and Kashmir. Had there been no `colonization' of Jews in those countries, Jesus would not have taken such a long journey from Palestine to India. All of this then appeared in a doctored version of the Bhavishya Purana in India mentioned for the first time in the Secret Doctrine, and later printed in Bombay in 1910 under the order of Maharaja Partap Singh of Kashmir. Does anyone on the list knows how the above plays a role in relation to the convictions of the different parties currently in Afghanistan or/and Kashmir ? Eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.