Guest guest Posted October 30, 2001 Report Share Posted October 30, 2001 List Members Dharma/Dean Here is the very beginning of Chapter Two of The Arctic Home of the Vedas. What the author does is substantiate a warm, Arctic climate without going outside the bounds of generally accepted physics. This is a part of his larger scheme of things, in which he alleges that the Indo European culture had its origin in the Arctic coasts in antiquity. From there, of course, it is just a hop, skip and a jump to the opening to the hollow earth. From this point onwards, we can construct that our own origin is in the hollow earth. I don't think that he is technically correct, however. It was Mike Mott who first suggested on this list that a cloud canopy once existed around the earth as around Venus, and that such a canopy would bhave evenly distributed the warmth of the Earth. Mr. Cater gives a more technical explanation as to how- he explains that photons from the Sun would go through a transformation and a " compacting " upon passing through such a canopy and form themselves into soft particles/prana. Soft particles would absorb, like carrier cells in biology, the harder, heat-giving particles and thus avoid a total greenhouse effect. But without having to introduce the physics of soft particles, Bal Gangadhar Tilak has armed us with enough logic to justify an Indo European existence along theArctic coasts of Europe and Siberia. The author, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, was a famous man in India at his death in the1920s. this was due to his part intheindependencemovement, even before the big role of Gandhi. His name was a house hold word, and this was one of his most famous books. Once again we see that the Hindu culture isarich resource for the Hollow Earth Theory. We have barely begun to tap it. CHAPTER II THE GLACIAL PERIOD Snip The climate of our globe at the present day is characterised by a succession of seasons, spring, summer, autumn and winter, caused by the inclination of the earth's axis to the plane of the ecliptic. When the North Pole of the earth is turned away from the sun in its annual course round that luminary, we have winter in the northern and summer in the southern hemisphere, and vice versa when the North Pole is turned towards the sun. The cause of the rotation of seasons in the different hemispheres is thus very simple, and from the permanence of this cause one may be led to think that in the distant geological ages the climate of our planet must have been characterised by similar rotations of hot and cold seasons. But such a supposition is directly contradicted by geological evidence. The inclination of the earth's axis to the plane of ecliptic, or what is technically called the obliquity of the ecliptic, is not the sole cause of climatic variations on the surface of the globe. High altitude and the existence of oceanic and aerial currents, carrying and diffusing the heat of the equatorial region to the other parts of the globe, have been found to produce different climates in countries having the same latitude. The. Gulf Stream is a notable instance of such oceanic currents and had it not been for this stream the climate in the North-West of Europe would have been quite different from what it is at present. Again if the masses of land and water be differently distributed from what they are at present, there is every reason to suppose that different climatic conditions will prevail on the surface of the globe from those which we now experience, as such a distribution would materially alter the course of oceanic and aerial currents going from the equator to the Poles. Therefore, in the early geological ages, when the Alps were low and the Himalayas not yet upheaved and when Asia and Africa were represented only by a group of islands we need not be surprised if, from geological evidence of fossil fauna and flora, we find that an equable and uniform climate prevailed over the whole surface of the globe as the result of these geographical conditions. In Mesozoic and Cainozoic times this state of things appears, to have gradually changed. But though the climate in the Secondary and the Tertiary era was not probably as remarkably uniform as in the Primary, yet there is clear geological evidence to show that until the close of the Pliocene period in the Tertiary era the climate was not yet differentiated into zones and there were then no hot and cold extremes as at present. The close of the Pliocene and the whole of the Pliestocene period was marked by violent changes of climate bringing on what is called the Glacial and Inter-Glacial epochs. But it is now conclusively established that before the advent of this period a luxuriant forest vegetation, which can only grow and exist at present in the tropical or temperate climate, flourished in the high latitude of Spitzbergen, where the sun goes below the horizon, from November till March, thus showing that a warm climate prevailed in the Arctic regions in those days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.