Lies led to pro-Pak bias

[Guest guest]

Attlee's reminder: how lies led to pro-Pak bias

 

Secret papers say US backed India, it didn't fit into UK minister's plans

 

C DASGUPTA

 

AS British Prime Minister Tony Blair prepares to exercise a ``calming influ=

ence'' in New Delhi and Islamabad, he would do well to reflect on the lesson=

s to be drawn from the role played by Britain when clandestine warfare first=

made its appearance in Kashmir.

 

 

Beijing backing: Pak

``All the concessions are being asked from India while Pakistan concedes li=

ttle or nothing. The attitude still seems to be that it is India which is at=

fault whereas the complaint was rightly lodged against Pakistan.'' — Attlee=

to his minister, Baker, on the 1947 tribal invasion

 

In 1947, when Pakistani tribesmen invaded Kashmir, Britain decided to adopt=

a pro-Pakistan tilt — not because of any merit in the case but strictly in =

pursuit of British global interests in the belief that this was essential fo=

r her Middle Eastern policy. Unfortunately for India, the British minister i=

n charge of executing this policy, Philip J Noel Baker, had few scruples in =

exceeding his instructions.

 

As newly-researched material (recently declassified) in the just published =

new book, War and Diplomacy in Kashmir 1947-48 (Sage) by this author reveals=

, Noel Baker decided to take a totally anti-India stand in the UN instead of=

leaning in its favour as instructed by his government. He deliberately misr=

epresented India's position to his own government.

 

He was reprimanded by Prime Minister Clement Richard Attlee in a remarkable=

Top Secret and Personal telegram. Attlee wrote: ``I find it very hard to re=

concile the view which you express as to the attitude of the Indian delegati=

on with the representations I have received through the High Commissioner fr=

om India here. It appears to me that all the concessions are being asked fro=

m India while Pakistan concedes little or nothing.

 

The attitude still seems to be that it is India which is at fault whereas t=

he complaint was rightly lodged against Pakistan.''

 

Noel-Baker misled his government on the US position too. In 1947-48, Washin=

gton accepted (at the level of the Secretary of State George Marshall) the f=

act that Kashmir legally belonged to India by virtue of the Maharaja's acces=

sion. In February 1948, the Americans informed Noel-Baker that they were dis=

turbed by the implications of the resolution that he wanted to move in the U=

N which would have allowed Pakistan to deploy its troops in Kashmir.

 

When the British side argued that Kashmir was a ``territory in dispute'', t=

he Americans disagreed, stating that they ``found it difficult to deny the l=

egal validity of Kashmir's accession to India''. Under pressure from Noel-Ba=

ker, the US finally agreed to float a draft resolution which would have perm=

itted entry of Pakistani troops but only if India concurred. When his cabine=

t colleagues objected that India would never accept this, Noel-Baker chose t=

o conceal his own hand in prompting the US move.

 

 

In November 1948, the acting leader of the US delegation in the Security Co=

uncil, John Foster Dulles, complained to the State Department that the ``pre=

sent UK approach (to the) Kashmir problem appears extremely pro-GOP (Governm=

ent of Pakistan) as against (the) middle ground we have sought to follow.''

 

In 1947-48 Britain chose to ignore the implications of the clandestine war =

launched by Pakistan. This led to an increasing Pakistani appetite for such =

actions, resulting ultimately in the massive terrorist campaign unleashed by=

the ISI.

 

If Blair seriously wants to play a calming role in the sub-continent, he mu=

st do everything in his power to ensure that the terrorists are rooted out f=

rom Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied territory. If the terrorists are not brou=

ght to justice, India will be left with no other choice than to ``bring just=

ice'' to them, to borrow President Bush's felicitous phrase.

 

(C Dasgupta, one of India's most distinguished diplomats, was Ambassador to=

China and Brussels before retiring recently)