Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Britain Roars Back into West Asia

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Bush Opens Door to Britain's Return to ME, Arafat's Restoration

DEBKAfile Special Analysis

 

"What remains to be seen is how Arafat will use his fresh lease of

life. Will he entrap the British in his toils as he did the

Americans, making them the unwilling sponsors of his terrorist

activities? Or will he reward Britain for standing by him by setting

up an Anglo-Palestinian front against Israel?"

 

April 30: The UK did not need a second invitation from George W.

Bush to come roaring back to the Middle East to Yasser Arafat's

rescue – with Javier Solana's European Union outfit riding in on its

back.

The initial arrangement was cautious: The British would arrive in

the innocuous, limited form of a joint Anglo-American guard to make

sure that the six Palestinians, whose extradition Israel demanded as

its condition for releasing Arafat, stayed in their Palestinian

jail. Once they were handed over to their international custodians,

the Israel siege tanks pinning them and Yasser Arafat down in his

Ramallah headquarters would roll back, Arafat would be free to

travel and the US would begin hauling itself out of the Palestinian-

Israeli mire.

Its place would be filled by Europeans, led by the UK.

To get the ball rolling, Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon was

first bulldozed Sunday, April 28, into driving through his

government the initial formula of an American-British guard for the

six wanted men: the four PLFP killers of Tourism Minister Rehavam,

the PLFP Secretary Ahmad Saadat who dispatched them, and Arafat's

financial director Fuad Shobaki, who organized funds for the Karin-A

arms smuggling venture and terrorist operations.

According to DEBKAfile's sources in Washington and Israel, Sharon,

by bowing to Bush's insistence on this first step, has dug a deep

pit at Israel's feet and set the region on the path to seismic geo-

strategic shifts. Nothing can now stop the Europeans, led by the

eager British, from restoring Yasser Arafat's standing as

Palestinian leader and reconstructing Palestinian security bodies,

the very infrastructure that Israel's military painstakingly knocked

down in its month-long counter-terror sweep through Palestinian West

Bank towns.

This single decision goes a long way to reversing Israel's military

achievements in fighting off Arafat's Intifada terror offensive. In

some ways, it turns the clock back, rendering almost irrelevant the

774 Israeli victims who died – and ten times that number injured -

in the years of Palestinian terror following the signing of the 1993

Oslo accords that brought Arafat into the country.

The Israeli prime minister and a majority of ministers were swayed

by two arguments. One, the US president's national security adviser

Condoleeza Rice's claim to the prime minister's adviser Danny

Ayalon, that Israel's refusal would undercut the Bush

administration's entire Middle East strategy, and obstruct the US

military offensive against Iraq, as well as its war on global terror

as a whole. Israel would not escape blame for upsetting Washington's

plans.

The second argument came in the form of President Bush's non-

specific commitment to stand by Israel.

During his telephone assault on Sharon Saturday and Sunday, April 27

and 28, Bush made two things clear, which the prime minister

refrained from sharing with his cabinet colleagues:

One , that the US would supervise the restoration of Arafat's

fortunes and reconstruction of Palestinian security services from

afar: the British would be in charge of the fieldwork.

Two, the British were brought in to satisfy Arafat.

Sharon did disclose to the cabinet that the senior British staffer

on the spot would be Alistair Crooke, a former high-ranking MI6 man

and European Union's Javier Solana's representative in Jerusalem.

Washington's decision to move into a backstage supervisory role was

not revealed. Bush could have retained a more active share in the

project by sending retired general Anthony Zinni back to the region.

This was not suggested by the United States or Israel.

Not letting the grass grow, the British advance party of "security

experts" quietly arrived Monday night, 24 hours after the Israeli

government decision. Their first job is to deal with the

technicalities for the transfer of the six wanted men to a jail in

Palestinian territory – presumably the British-built prison facility

in Jericho. The four sentenced assassins are less of a problem than

the Shobaki and Saadat who have not been tried for their crimes.

Israel is demanding that they too be locked up in prison. A solution

remains to be worked out.

The British trio signifies the onset of a complex gambit that

furthers the Bush administration's desire to throw off the Israel-

Palestinian encumbrance and mute its Middle East involvement in

favor of building up Central Asian assets. Washington is handing the

Middle East standard over to its British surrogate.

This gambit seriously damages Israel.

Sharon was duly warned more than once from the Oval Office to hold

his horses in Operation Defense Shield, to pull Israeli forces out

of Palestinian towns and turn to diplomacy – or else Washington

would go its own way. The Americans signaled their intentions to

Sharon shortly after Israel launched its massive drive into

Palestinian cities, in response to the Palestinian Passover suicide

rampage against Israel civilians.

The signals sharpened before and during the Saudi crown prince

Abdullah's weekend stay at the Bush ranch in Crawford, Texas.

The Israeli prime minister failed to heed the signals, too single-

mindedly engrossed in waging war against Arafat's terrorist

infrastructure. As a result, he has been lurching in the last ten

days from one diplomatic contretemps to the next, squandering hard-

won strategic assets in the process, with the following consequences:

A. The grand US-Israeli plan for cutting Arafat down and consigning

him to the Gaza Strip has been tossed aside, together with its

companion blueprint for establishing self-rule on the West Bank

under the auspices of the Kingdom of Jordan. The blow sustained by

Israel – in no small measure under Saudi influence – has also hit

Abdullah II of Amman, who based his fundamental policies on a

strategic partnership with the United States and Israel. The Saudi

crown prince achieved two strokes in Crawford: he got the Israeli

army out of Ramallah and blocked Jordan's reinstatement on the West

Bank.

B. In contrast, The Palestinian authority will be reinstated -

possibly on different lines with fresh faces, according to British

and the European concepts. Arafat will be re-confirmed as top man.

C. The Palestinian security agencies, whose primary function was to

mastermind terror, will be rebuilt too by the same hands. The

Americans are prepared to admit off the record that the CIA failed

abysmally in its efforts to create effectively functioning security

agencies following the conclusion of the Oslo accords. The British

will certainly pursue their own ideas and install their own agents

in the restored bodies.

D. The British teams taking over in Palestinian-ruled territory will

function on three levels:

The Foreign Office's Arab-Palestinian experts, "security personnel" -

who are actually officers of the British secret service, MI6, and

former commandos trained in guerrilla and counter-terror tactics.

E. Those three groups will become the kernel of a larger

international force made up mostly of European intelligence and

military officers, to which American advisers will be attached as

supervisors. This arrangement means the termination of the familiar

trilateral US-Israeli-Palestinian security coordination commissions

that were mostly moribund anyway. Their infrastructure will be

handed over to the British.

F. Israel will eventually have to re-address its security and

political concerns with the Palestinians to the British Foreign

Office instead of the State Department in Washington. Many Israelis

will rub their eyes in disbelief at the return of the Union Jack,

the Foreign Office and MI6 to Palestine – and even more at the

notion that Ariel Sharon let it happen.

It is not a happy prospect for Israelis, who are perfectly aware of

the pro-Arab winds blowing consistently from London since 1948.

Yasser Arafat's installment as head of an independent Palestinian

state has always been a key policy goal for the British government

and its intelligence agencies.

What remains to be seen is how Arafat will use his fresh lease of

life. Will he entrap the British in his toils as he did the

Americans, making them the unwilling sponsors of his terrorist

activities? Or will he reward Britain for standing by him by setting

up an Anglo-Palestinian front against Israel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...