Guest guest Posted June 2, 2002 Report Share Posted June 2, 2002 Indian M'sians struggling on an uneven playing fieldhttp://www.malaysiakini.com/opinionsfeatures/20020601004493.php S Nagarajan and Dr M Nada 3:24pm Sat Jun 1st, 2002 Since it was announced that this year's intake into publicuniversities was based on a questionable merit system thatsustains racial discrimination, there has been a spate ofcommentaries in the mainstream media on the Indian Malaysiancommunity. Some of these commentators, mostly Indian Malaysianprofessionals, have resorted to what we think is a weak attemptat an internal criticism of the community, sounding more likeIndian-bashing instead. Communal self-reflection and criticism is certainly a good thingfor it helps to identify issues, build self-correction measuresand communal self-regeneration. But to do so, one must be honestand look at the issue carefully and comprehensively. To consider only the surface issues and forget about structuralones, to merely consider internal issues without the externalones, borders on prejudice and/or naivety. Thus for some commentators, the predicament of poor IndianMalaysians is solely of their own making, i.e. they do not workhard and take advantage of the abundant opportunities availablein Malaysia. Supposedly, they are always complaining and squabbling amongthemselves. They do not take an interest nor bother to invest intheir children's education. They are robbers and violentgangsters. In short, they are just bad and irresponsiblecitizens who are an embarrassment to the community and thenation, and hindrance to attaining Vision 2020 and the goal ofBangsa Malaysia. Are these statements of facts? Are they anywhere near the'truth' of the matter? Limited view Certainly not. Sadly, some among the well-placed members of theIndian Malaysian middle class seem to have a limited view oftheir community and have certainly failed to appreciate theimmense social, economic and political problems faced by them. This has resulted in them playing a game of 'good Indian versusbad Indian'. The message they want to convey to the largerMalaysian society is they are the good Indians. They have workedhard (the 'rags to riches' story is substituted here) andsucceeded in life; so why can't the others, particularly thosein the poor community? They begin to feel that the bad Indians(read as the poor Tamils) are tarnishing their image throughtheir 'lazy, drunken ways'. As typical of a successful and comfortable middle class withinweak minorities, they find excuses not to address the rootcauses of poverty among Indian Malaysians. While addressingindividual causes they are blind to structural ones. They, for instance, see the abundance of opportunities but failto see the difference between these and access to them. Whileexamining the poor community's behaviour, they somehow do notsee the role of the government or the negative social impact ofits policies. Either they are blind or are aware that such a course of actionwould be very uncomfortable and risky. For it involves callingfor better governance and taking to task the government for itsneglect of poor Indian Malaysians, while addressing the internalobstacles. So, what's the easiest thing to do? Make careless statements,avoid taking the government to task where necessary, createmyths and half truths, and keep badgering the poor IndianMalaysians for the 'poor image' of the community. There is veryoften a tone of contempt, which is rather disturbing. Consider the comments by one Deeo of Banting (New Straits Times,May 22): "Many Indian parents do not really take a serious interest intheir children's education. They are not really prepared toinvest in their children's future either because of poorguidance or they expect subsidies and handouts from thegovernment. "Look at the Chinese. They are ever willing to work hard, saveand make great financial sacrifices in life which not manyIndians are willing to do. They have long-term planning. "But take a look again at the Chinese schools. This situationhas never been a problem or a stumbling block. They don't dependon the government for hand-outs. Â"They build their own schools. Don't say the Chinese are rich.There are also lorry drivers, estate labourers and manualworkers among the Chinese. So what's the problem? It is thepriorities in life." Only avenue At best, Deeo can be said to be misinformed. And certainlyunsympathetic. Deeo's assertions are, however, far from thetruth. While we understand that some parents may not pay muchattention to education, it is certainly central to most IndianMalaysian parents. Education has become the only avenue available for theirchildren to attain upward social mobility. Thus, some poorparents take up two or more jobs and work very long hours inorder to put their children through school. They put all hope ontheir children, believing that a university education for theireldest child will be a ticket for the whole family to climb outof their misery. Here the attention to individuals should end; we are faced with'structural' problems. Tamil schools and Tamil education arebeing systematically destroyed by short-sighted governmentpolicies. And after struggling to put their children through education,what happens at the university admission level? Their childrenmay not have gotten straight As in the STPM examination,considering their socio-economic background. They may not havehad the luxury to spend (the middle class concern for) 'qualitytime' with their children. But what is important is these poor children worked hard, triedand qualified to enter universities. So, naturally when they aredenied admission into public universities under a veryquestionable race-based merit system, they are upset and feelcheated. Deeo talks about poor Indian Malaysians not saving, makingsacrifices and investing in their children's education. Heshould first suggest how it would be possible for many in thecommunity. Even after over a century, the plantation owners and thegovernment are still dragging their feet over the monthly wageissue. The plantation owners are still insisting that they wouldonly pay RM300 a month. Now, how much exactly is a plantationworker expected to save from this amount after paying foressentials such as food? We can forgive Deeo's myopia and ignorance for only as far backas three years ago even the Primary Industries Minister Dr LimKeng Yaik was not aware what the rubber tappers were Â"doingbehind the treesÂ", and made a joke of it at the expense of theIndian community! Deeo is also wrong to suggest that poor Indian Malaysians havenot tried to help themselves. Just do a cursory examination ofthe efforts of the community after the announcement of the planto set up Maika Holdings. He or she will then realise the driveof the community to help itself and its frustration with theIndian Malaysian political leadership for its inability toprovide financial certainty. Further, Deeo insults poor Indian Malaysians claiming they areseeking subsidies and handouts from the government. Aren't thesepeople citizens of the country whose ancestors had contributedenormously in laying the foundations of the modern Malaysianeconomy? Is it pathetic for them to expect the government to allocate afair share of resources for them to grow with the nation'sprogress? Just policies What the poor Indian Malaysians seek are just policies from thegovernment and education and other opportunities to betterthemselves. And really, in principle, why do we electrepresentatives and put them in our Parliament? Is election justa matter of finding jobs for some Malaysians in our Parliament?Deeo's argument here is really pathetic and in need of someminimum exercise of critical analysis. We wonder why the likes of Deeo are only comparing us with theChinese Malaysians and not with the Malay Malaysians and theethnically-discriminatory application of the NEP. Unlike ChineseMalaysians, the bulk of Indian Malaysians were trapped in acycle of generational poverty peculiar to the plantationeconomy. Here again, there is a thorough ignorance of thedifferent histories of the Chinese and Indian Malaysians in acolonial setting. The rural-based Malays were in a similar situation as the IndianMalaysians in the plantations more than 30 years ago. Thegovernment embarked on a massive social engineering programmefor the Malays and allocated billions of ringgit to raise theirstandard of living. After more than three decades, thegovernment still considers it has not achieved the desiredresults for Malay Malaysians. Considering this, how would one expect a numerically small andeconomically disadvantaged community to overcome similarobstacles on its own, particularly in a racially-chargedenvironment? Is it not the responsibility of an electedgovernment to devise an appropriate economic plan to lift thepoor Indian Malaysians, as all poor Malaysians, out of theirmisery? Another columnist KJ John (New Straits Times, May 25) lecturesIndian Malaysians how to become first-class citizens, usingfanciful words such as Vision 2020 and Bangsa Malaysia. Hisconcept of a Bangsa Malaysia is not really clear. But perhapsthe Johns, Deeos and others giving their 'three sense' worthwould ponder on these developments and enlighten us further onhow Indian Malaysians can be a component of Bangsa Malaysia. The breakdown of rubber plantations, the migration of poorIndian Malaysians from rural to urban poverty, lack ofopportunities, the socialisation of the young into anti-socialsurvival strategies are not purely the making of the community.What has the government done so far to resolve these matters? The government has formulated a home ownership scheme forplantation workers decades ago. But plantation owners areflouting it and the workers end up in urban squatter colonies.When the government does not set a good example by implementingthe policy forcefully, how are the young who end up in urbansqualors going to strive to be Â"first-class citizens? An Indian Malaysian academic has all the paper qualificationsand slogs for years in a public university. Over the years, heworks extremely hard and rises to be the acting head in hisfaculty. Then he goes on annual leave for a week. On returningto work, he finds a junior Malay colleague has been appointed tohead the faculty. What idea of Bangsa Malaysia is this IndianMalaysian academic suppose to have? A low-income earning Indian Malaysian works hard, makessacrifices and saves to buy an average house for his family.When he buys from a developer, he has to pay more than a MalayMalaysian millionaire for the same type of house. What relevanceis Bangsa Malaysia to this average Indian Malaysian house buyer?The family of an intelligent and responsible Indian Malaysianstudent moves to a new town dominated by civil servants. Whenthe student enrolls in a new school, her fair-minded Malayteacher reviews her performance and decides to make her a schoolprefect. But the recommendation is immediately shot down becausethe student is not a Malay Malaysian. What idea of BangsaMalaysia is this girl going to hold when she enters adult life? Some plantation workers managed to move out of their wretchedenvironment through hard work, sweat and tears. They borrow fromfriends and relatives, buy small plots of land and go intocattle rearing and other self-employed activities. Then theirlivelihood gets threatened as some poachers keep carting awaytheir cattle for about two years. They lodge over 100 policereports about their missing cattle. There appear to be no actionfrom the Malay-dominated police force. How are these hardworking Indian Malaysians going to survive and be good citizens?What is Bangsa Malaysia for them? Not realistic Unless we live in a totally egalitarian society, there is nosuch thing as a level playing field. A highly stratified,unequal society with inter-generational poverty cannot have alevel playing field. Agreed, there are many Indian Malaysians who have entered such afield and come out successful (we suppose, it includes peoplelike John). But to say people who are talking about such a problem as havinga level playing field (in the context of discussions onmeritocracy) are not being realistic or practical is reallymissing the point. As a democratic principle, should a society plan to achieve adegree of level playing field? Is that being addressed in oursociety? And practically, should not capable young Malaysians ofall communities be educated to be 'good' citizens to leadMalaysia tomorrow? What kind of policy is that that wastes itshuman resources on the basis of race/ethnic group affiliation? We understand that this 'rag-to-riches' narrative is aconvenient explanatory model for many upwardly mobile IndianMalaysians. But it is a model that focuses on some successfulindividuals and loses sight of the many who are pushed out ofthe 'path of development'. Marginalised. The message to all the Johns and Deeos out there is simple. Stopjust blaming or demonising the victims of unequal, unsustainabledevelopment. And, racist policies. If we as a community andnation are really serious about pulling the poor IndianMalaysians out of their current rut, we need wholesome analysisand solutions. And that involves not only undertaking self-criticism to developself-help measures but also making the government in amulti-cultural society to be more responsive to the plight ofpoor Indian Malaysians (and poor Malaysians in general). Yes, you can throw poor families out from the squatters areas(many of these will be Indian Malaysians) because these slumsare dirty and source of social ills but do that after installingand realising the right to housing and enabling livingenvironments in actual practice. -----------------------S NAGARAJAN was a journalist with The Star and MalaysianBusiness, and is currently a research student at the Instituteof Postgraduate Studies and Research, Universiti Malaya.Dr M NADARAJAH is a sociologist by profession. He works onsustainable development issues and is currently the deputyco-ordinator of a virtual organisation called the AsianCommunication Network, with an anchor in Bangkok, Thailand. =====Evolution (eS) http://vettipechu.org/ http://live365.com/stations/tamiliam/ "Katka kasadara katpavai, katrapin, nitka adhatkuth thaga" ~ Kural Discover your Indian Roots at - http://www.esamskriti.comLong Live Sanathan / Kshatriya Dharam.Generate Positive Vibrations lifelong worldwide.Aap ka din mangalmaya rahe or Shubh dinam astu or Have a Nice DayUnity preceedes Strength Synchronize your efforts, avoid duplication.THINK, ACT, INFLUENCEShare the Wealth, to Un write back.Knowledge, Wealth, Happiness is meant to be shared. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.