Goal of US War: Rebuild Pakistan to ensure India's suppression

[Guest guest]

As I said in mid september, India is the target of Western

aggression. Any fantasies about US being fed up with Muslim terror

are a delusion. Wake up India. Pakistan is UK/USA's baby. When India

annexed the State of Hyderbad, it was the USA that led the

condemnation against India at the UN.

Lets not forget the influence of the House of Saud, either. George

W. has had only 3 world leaders visit him at his Texas home. UK's

Blair, Russia's Putin and Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Abdullah. It

was the Crown Prince of Texas Oil meeting the Crown Prince of Arab

oil. Not for a day or two but a whole week.

 

Do the Math and realize that rather than being an asset to The

Western Imperialist agenda, India, esp a Revitalized Hindu India, is

a great threat to the west's future domination of the Planet.

 

So nearly a year since the War on Terror began, how does India's new

Foriegn Secretary feel about US influence on the region,he says," We

don't see signs of

an end,(of Pak sponsored Terror against India) rather there has been

a revival."

 

TO ME IT IS OBVIOUS THAT ONE OF THE PRIMARY GOALS OF THE WAR ON

TERROR WAS TO REBUILD THE CRUMBLING FOUNDATIONS OF THE TERORIST

STATE KNOWN AS PAKISTAN. A state whose whole existance is dedicated

to the suppresion of India.

Vrin

 

 

Title: Foreign secretary nails America for double-speak on Pakistan

Author: HT Correspondent

Publication: Hindustan Times

July 9, 2002

 

India's new foreign secretary Kanwal Sibal on Monday revealed that

New Delhi's

patience with America's South Asia policy may be wearing thin.

 

Speaking at a CII organised round table discussion on Indo-US

relations, Sibal

mentioned certain obvious "disconnects" between Washington's stated

fears about

an Indo-Pak nuclear war and the direction of its foreign policy in

the region.

 

"One billion people did not feel threatened by an imminent nuclear

war, but

America said it did. There was no sign of India itself taking the

threat

seriously, but America decided to pull out its citizens. What else

did they do?

When Pakistan was test firing its missiles at the height of the

tension,

Washington did little more than express disappointment. If they were

really that

anxious, wouldn't they have done more?" Sibal said.

 

Sibal stunned an audience expecting to hear the usual gush-gush

statements on

Indo-US co-operation. He went on to lash out at the US for its

double-speak.

 

"Instead of putting pressure on Pakistan, we saw Pakistan being

rewarded. We

have information that Pakistan received more than $ eight billion

for its

co-operation to the US. Do you really reward a regime which you

think is going

to use nuclear weapons?" Sibal said. "The reasons were political,

but not very

clear," the foreign secretary said.

 

On the issue of bilateralism, he expressed regret that talks with

the United

States had in recent times been pushed to the background. "We don't

appreciate

this. Our dialogue with the US in recent weeks has become narrowed

by the scare

of a nuclear war."

 

Reserving the best part of his candour for Washington's policy on

terrorism in

Jammu and Kashmir, he said India expected to see America use its

influence on

Pakistan to roll back support to cross border terrorism. "We don't

see signs of

an end, rather there has been a revival."