My Complete Response to NY Times Anti-Hindu Article

[Guest guest]

NYTime's ludicrous 150 word limit will not allow this letter to be

printed, so please email it to as many people as possible. I sent

them a short letter that they better print or I will spend the next

month challenging their right to not publish my response. I sent

this to them anyway.

Vrin

 

 

Dear Editor,

 

Interesting to note the double standard applied when comparing your

story on NYPD's 9/11 response with the story on India's response to

its crisis. In the NYPD story not one individual or agency is

singled out, what to speak of being labeled as participants in the

tragedy. Yet when it comes to India, you directly single out the

authorities as accomplices to murder. Compared to NYC, Gujarat State

is much larger has millions of more people, an archaic

infrastructure and is basically an agrarian society. While

presenting India's overwhelmed police as baby-killers you ignore

facts such as the police's inability to arrest Muslims as well as

Hindus. Applying this same logic, Pataki, Giuliani, should be

charged with complicity in terrorism. However incompetence doesn't

translate into terrorism in America therefore incompetence can not

translate into genocide in India.

 

I was shocked to read 4 month old Saudi/Pakistani propaganda

versions of the Gujarat violence in America's leading newspaper.

Obviously with such sources you would miss facts such as Pakistan's

well documented ISI campaign against India and its Hindu activists

in particular. This also explains the ambivalence your article

displays when it comes to names. If revealed, such names would

automatically prove the sources to be unreliable entities with a

vested interest in demonizing Hinduism.

 

For years a united front of Islamists, Marxists, Christians and

Indian secularists have waged a ruthless war against Hindu activism.

The Gandhi-killer jacket forced on Hindu activists has been rejected

repeatedly by the Supreme Court. Thus the absurdity of demonizing a

group without a record became obvious. Now suddenly, the enemies of

Hinduism have united, as if on cue, and have now added genocide to

their arsenal of defamation and slander.

 

If you had, just once, mentioned the fact that the Taliban founders,

Pakistan's ISI agents, have been repeatedly intercepted in Gujarat,

your article may have carried more weight. This very omission tells

the intelligent reader volumes and weakens your attempt to demonize

Hindus.

 

Your most glaring omission is in reference to the lack of remorse

shown by Hindus. India's constitution claims to be secular yet it

forces Hindu taxpayers to fund anti-Hindu madrasses, born-again

Christian schools and free trips to Mecca. It enforces special

operational fees on private Hindu schools and yet fully funds all

Muslim/Christian schools. It allows Muslim men up to 4 wives,

divorce at whim, only 3 month's alimony and the right to kill on

just a suspicion of infidelity. It demands complete financial

secrecy for Muslim/Christian organizations but complete financial

transparency for Hindu groups. It allows private control of all

Mosques but enforces government control over most Hindu Temples and

frequently posts non-Hindus in control of temple finances.

This supposed secularist constitution of India gives legal

protection to Muslims and Christians in regards to slander and

defamation yet legally protects any and all such anti-Hindu

activities as free speech.

 

India's constitution is the institutionalized oppression of its

Hindu majority and a promotion of archaic and inhumane Islamic law.

By supporting financial secrecy for Islamic fundamentalists, India

is perhaps one of the greatest safe houses for millions of Islamic

Terrorist dollars. Therefore India's secularists are directly

responsible for the slaughter of thousands upon thousands of people,

world-wide.

 

The fact is the Hindus are the greatest victims in this tragedy.

Expecting remorse from the victim is perverse and it would be proper

for your paper to issue an apology for either being ignorant of the

facts or for being the lackeys of foreign intelligence agencies.

 

Finally, it is important to put into context who the VHP (Hindu

World Council) and the RSS (National Volunteer's Association) are.

They are the Sitting Bulls, Tecumsehs, Geronimos and Tupacs of the

modern era. Like those great heroes of America's indigenous

struggle, they will not replace their own ancient civilization with

an obviously flawed western civilization. As your paper previously

demonized the American Indians to justify slaughtering and

subjugating them, you are continuing this ignoble tradition in your

treatment of India's indigenous Hindus. Such journalism is another

form of genocide and rather than helping tell the story of the weak,

you are guaranteeing more misery, war and violence.