Bha_rata's National Security Strategy

[Guest guest]

Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:54:25 -0000

"S.Kalyanaraman" <kalyan97

Bha_rata's National Security Strategy

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/20/international/20STEXT_FULL.html?

tntemail0=&pagewanted=print&position=top

 

This is the full text of President Bush's new national security

strategy. The document, entitled "The National Security Strategy of

the United States," will soon be transmitted to Congress as a

declaration of the Administration's policy.

 

How should Bha_rata react to the strategic perceptions of US in

particular reference to Bha_rata's interests?

 

After the collapse of comintern, dismemberment of the Soviet Union,

the major communist country now is China.

 

Apparently, egged on by US, Dalai Lama is seeking 'autonomy for

Tibet together with a zone of peace'. I assume that the term, 'zone

of peace' is a euphemism for ensuring that the missile launch pads

are removed from Tibet and nuclearization of Tibet is undone.

 

>From the roof of the world, everyone else is like a sitting duck for

the Chinese missiles perched in Tibetan nuclear command facilities.

 

Shouldn't Bha_rata reject the Nehruvian legacy and declare support

for Free Tibet?

 

Shouldn't Bha_rata take a proactive stance in eliminating the maoist

threat in Nepal?

 

What, pray, should be the document titled: Bha_rata's National

Security Strategy? The preamble to the document can start with a

reference to the twin strategic threats to Bha_rata: Islamism and

Communism.