being indian abroad 2

[Guest guest]

Francois Gautier Being Indian abroad,

IIhttp://www.rediff.com/news/2002/oct/10franc.htmMy article, Being Indian

abroad, I triggered such a massive reaction that I felt it is better writing

another column to respond to points made by readers, rather than answer e-mail.

Obviously, America is not only fast food, artificial lights, cars and a

superficial vitality. There is a certain openness about America, a willingness

of the American people to listen to other points of view, which is unique. Yes,

America is also a land of freedom where in the last 300 years, people from all

nationalities, social classes, have been given the chance to make it good. They

have in turn responded to this unique trust by giving the United States their

100 per cent, which makes it the leading industrial and military nation in the

world. One finds too a sense of collectiveness, a caring for others, which

gives America some of the best road systems in the world and first-class public

amenities, such as the community centers found in many American cities. But is

America really the benevolent, casteless society some readers are convinced it

is? Well, I am not sure. For one, what the White Americans did to the Blacks

not that long ago must rank amongst some of the saddest deeds perpetuated by

one class of humanity on another; not to speak of the terrible and shameful

treatment inflicted upon the hapless Red Indians, the original inhabitants of

their land, a karma the US will have to pay for sooner or later. There are also

a lot of inequalities in the States: extremely rich people and some incredibly

poor folks, mostly Blacks, for such a country of tremendous wealth. Secondly,

are the Blacks today on a truly equal footing with the Whites? I am not

convinced either. Barring a few exceptions here and there, one still finds an

invisible and subtle ghetto, an unwritten caste system existing in the US

between the two communities and their problems are far from solved. India has

had an untouchable President. Has the US ever had a Black president, or

vice-president? American journalists and human rights activists like to

highlight the 'oppressed' condition of women in India. But as early as the late

sixties, India democratically elected a woman prime minister, the highest post

of the nation -- and that for nearly twenty years. Can the country of

triumphant feminism and gender equality boast of a woman President? The problem

is that most Indians suffer too much from an inferiority complex vis à vis the

West, to point this out to the Americans who are constantly criticising India

for its human rights in Kashmir and Gujarat. Yes, in America one enjoys the

liberty to do whatever one wants without bureaucracy and heavy taxation that

one is subjected to in India, or even in industrialised countries such as

France. But after September 11, freedoms have been heavily curtailed in the US,

especially if you have brown skin. Compare this to India: I have lived here for

33 years, I have gone to the most remote places, traveled to sacred spots with

my cameras, tape recorder and white face. And never once have I been aggressed,

never once has my passport been asked for in the streets (try traveling in the

subway in Paris if you have a brown face and a leather jacket), never once have

I been mugged at late nights in Delhi, Mumbai or Chennai, whereas in Washington,

the capital of the 'land of freedom,' we were told not to go out alone in

certain parts after 8 pm. Some e-mail dealt with the extraordinary 'religious

freedom one can enjoy in the US, where nobody bothers whether you are a Jew, a

Hindu, or a Christian.' Fair enough. But let's put it that way: the American

population is overwhelmingly Christian and nobody there finds anything to say

that the President of the United States is sworn in on the Bible, or that in

some states a Christian prayer is uttered before the start of the school. India

has a thumping Hindu majority (80 per cent), but imagine the uproar if Atal

Bihari Vajpayee had been sworn in on the Bhagavad Gita! And remember what

happened when Murli Manohar Joshi wanted to introduce the chanting of the

Saraswati Vandana in schools. Yet, India has today a Muslim President, the

third one since Independence. Did the US ever have a Muslim President? Some of

you have a point: when I say all Indians settled in the US should regroup

themselves under a 'Hindu American banner,' it does look as if I want to

exclude Christians, Muslim and Sikh Indians. Indeed, most of the protesting

e-mail were from Christians, Muslims and Sikhs. Let's answer the objections

from Christians first. One Christian reader tells me: 'Christians have no

freedom in India, or else they are killed like Australian missionary Graham

Staines.' There is no denying this was a horrible crime and that its

perpetrators should be punished -- and they are in the process of being

punished. But this is an isolated case and our friend disregards what the

Christians have done to Hindus over centuries.

The first Christian community in the world, that of the Syrian Christians,

settled in India in the first century. They were not only allowed to practice

their religion in peace, but they prospered here, whereas at the same time they

were persecuted in Rome and later in many Arabic countries. But when Vasco da

Gama landed in India in the 16th century, the Portuguese, with the active

collaboration of many Indian Christians, unleashed a reign of terror in Goa and

some parts of Kerala, crucifying Brahmins, razing temples, forcibly marrying

their soldiers to Goanese women. The British, even if they did not use such

violent means, gave a free hand to missionaries to convert huge parts of India,

particularly in the Northeast. Today, American or Australian dollars are used to

still convert unethically, by using the economic incentive amongst tribals and

untouchables, teaching the new converts to hate their culture and customs and

creating a spirit of separatism, as the Christian Bodo and Mizo militants have

shown. A few Sikh friends also resented my not having mentioned Sikhism. Let me

quote straightaway from Sri Aurobindo: 'The Sikh Khalsa was an astonishingly

original and novel creation and its face was turned not to the past but to the

future. Apart and singular in its theocratic head and democratic soul and

structure, it was the first attempt to combine the deepest elements of Islam

and Vedanta. But it could not create between the spirit and the external life

the transmitting medium of a rich creative thought and culture. And thus

hampered and deficient it began and ended with narrow local limits, achieved

intensity but no power of expansion...' Unfortunately, the Sikhs, because they

had to defend themselves against the terrible persecution by the Muslims, cut

themselves from the mainstream spirit of Hindu tolerance -- from where they

originally came, and where they might ultimately return. But do they not come

from the great Hindu family? Has not till lately every good Hindu family

donated one of their sons to Sikhism? Do not Hindus still today go to

gurdwaras? Yet today, many expatriate Sikhs want to have nothing to do with

Hinduism, and sometimes even with India. What about Indian Muslims? Today we

see, even though they benefit in India from a freedom they would not have in

Saudi Arabia, or even in Pakistan, Indian Muslims often feel their first

allegiance goes to Islam and not to India. The irony of it all is that Muslims

invaded India, ran it with an iron hand, attempted to make India a totally

Islamic country by forcibly converting millions of Hindus -- and today they

manage to portray themselves in the eyes of the world as the persecuted.

Another strong objection from some readers: religion divides. First let me say

Hinduism, as Sri Aurobindo or Vivekananda, or Sri Ramakrishna envisioned it, is

not a religion but a living spirituality which has given to the world -- and

still gives it today -- wonderful tools: hata-yoga copied all over this planet,

meditation, or pranayama. Secondly, at a time when the two largest monotheistic

religions of the world, Islam and Christianity still claim their God is the

only true one, while Hindus, through the extraordinary concept of the avatar,

recognise that God manifests himself at different times, in different

countries, under different names and thus grant to everybody the right to

worship God under any form. This is a very precious spiritual (and not

religious) knowledge which has been lost to the world and which, even the most

humble Hindu peasant spontaneously practices. It is also true that things in

India are not as they should be. Hindus there are not united, India is divided

along caste and religious lines by unscrupulous politicians. Yes, Hindus can

also be racists, as one rediff reader remarked; they do suffer at the same

time, as another one commented, from a big inferiority complex, as well as one

of superiority, quite an achievement! Yes, it is as well correct that

expatriate Indians do often tend to become more conscious of their roots than

India Indians: they will send their children to learn Bharata Natyam and will

remember all the festivals. Good, there is a whole generation of upper middle

class kids in India who are so desperately aping the worst of the West, that

they are lost for India. Yes, Hindus can be selfish, passive, cowardly,

miserly, whereas many of them are extremely rich. But nevertheless, they remain

a wonderful people, alive with an inbred joy and spirituality. Contrary to what

one of the readers assert, there is a definite atmosphere in India, something

special, something unique, which is there nowhere else in the world. Those of

you who spent a lot of time abroad will notice a certain quality in the

atmosphere as soon as you enter India, if you are a little sensitive. Indian

Americans or Hindu Americans? To start with, there are already Indian

Americans, those that Columbus mistook for real Indians and you can't usurp

their names. Secondly, it ultimately depends on the Christians, the Sikhs and

the Muslims, who in the last few decades, have drifted more and more from the

Indian psyche, striving to strike a fundamental identity of their own. We have

also seen that the numerous Indian Americans associations in the US, where

there are indeed Muslim, Christians and Sikh Indians, are frequently paralysed

by these three groups. Thus, if Hindus in the United States regroup themselves

under a 'Hindu American' label it might prompt the three minorities to wake up

to the reality of a stronger, overwhelmingly Hindu majority. It will give a

clear-cut identity to Indians in the States, dissociating them from the

Pakistanis, the Bangladeshis, the Saudis, or the Afghans. It will also help

make known to the average American the extraordinary achievements of the Hindu

community in the US. Lastly, it will help the Indian government, by creating a

powerful and effective lobby in the US, free from the shackles imposed by

Christian, Sikh and Muslim Indians. Ultimately, it will be up to these three

minorities to decide whether they want to re-join this great family that is

'Induism.' For we should then give back to 'Hindus' its proper meaning: Indus

from the civilisation of the valley of Indus, probably the most ancient

civilisation of the world still active today. Once upon a time, Indian

Christians, Parsis, Muslims and Hindus were called 'Indus' by the invaders

without differentiation of caste and religion. Is it not time to put back this

habit into practice? Finally, is America going to be perpetually the El Dorado

that still make Indians dream? Not sure. There are certain signs which show

that the US economy is entering a period of darkness: the slump in the stock

market, the packing up of half of Silicon Valley, the near bankruptcy of many

American airlines, and more than that, the erosion of the American confidence.

There are bound to be more terrorist attacks on the US in the next few years,

as Samuel Huntington's prophecy of a 'clash of civilizations' between Islam and

the West, with China siding with Islam (let's us not forget that Beijing already

gave Pakistan the technology to build its nuclear weapons) and Hindu India

allied with the West, will prove more and more true. This in turn will trigger

more panic, more loss of confidence amongst Americans and eventually a stock

market crash on the lines of the one which happened in 1929. On the other hand,

India, this 'Third World country,' has learnt to live with Islamic terrorism,

its people do not panic as Americans do, it has a relatively stable stock

market, its software business is still expanding and is beginning to offer

salaries which will compete with the West. Could it be that this great brain

drain towards America could be reversed and that NRIs start coming back to

their country of origin in search of greener pastures? One could even dream:

today one still sees this huge humiliating queues in front of the US embassy in

Delhi, where visa applicants are treated like cattle. Will we one day witness

Americans waiting in line in front of the Indian embassy in Washington to

obtain working visas in India? It will happen my friends. One day. Post Script:

Out of the 350 e-mails, nearly 80 per cent were messages of praise and

encouragement from Hindus. Out of the 20 per cent who disagreed, 14 per cent

were (surprisingly) from Indian Christians, 3 per cent were from Sikhs, 2 per

cent from Muslims and 1 per cent from Hindus.

Discover your Indian Roots at - http://www.esamskriti.comLong Live Sanathan /

Kshatriya Dharam. Become an Intellectual KshatriyaGenerate Positive Vibrations

lifelong worldwide.Aap ka din mangalmaya rahe or Shubh dinam astu or Have a

Nice DayUnity preceedes Strength Synchronize your efforts, avoid

duplication.THINK, ACT, INFLUENCE, to Un write back.Create Positive

Karmas by being Focussed, controlling senses, will power & determinationNever

boasts about yr victory and successKnowledge, Wealth, Happiness are meant to be

sharedBe Open Minded, pick up what yu like from the worldBe Thick skinned,

internalize criticism, do what yu think is rightLet not the power of your enemy

deter yu, fortitude is what the Geeta teachesStop cribbing, ACTION is what the

Indian scriptures talk aboutTake the battle into the enemy camp, SET THE

AGENDA, be proactiveIn an argument, no emotions, be detached, get yr facts

right, then attack with the precision of a missile