Guest guest Posted October 16, 2002 Report Share Posted October 16, 2002 Non-Brahmins can also become priests: SC New Delhi, Oct 5 Administering a crushing blow to the age old custom and tradition of bestowing priesthood of Hindu temples exclusively on Brahmins, the Supreme Court has held that non-Brahmins can also perform religious ceremonies and function as priests if they are well-versed with the relevant rituals. Affirming a full-bench judgement of the Kerala High Court and dismissing an appeal against it, the Court said, ''Any custom or usage irrespective of any proof of their existence in pre- Constitutional days cannot be countenanced as a source of law to claim any rights when it is found to violate human rights, dignity, social equality and specific mandate of the Constitution and law by Parliament. The appeal by N Adithyan raised the question whether the appointment of a person who was not a Malayala Brahmin as ''Shanthikaran'' or ''poojari'' (priest) of the temple in question- Kongorpilly Neerikode Shiva Temple at Alangad village in Ernakulam District in Kerala-was violative of the Constitutional and Statutory rights of the appellant. Resolving a dispute over the appointment of a non-Malayali Brahmin as the priest of the temple, Mr Justice S Rajendra Babu and Mr Justice Doraiswami Raju dealt with various issues of vital Constitutional, social and public importance, having religious overtones. The judges said it was not essential that only a Brahmin, who was neither qualified nor well-versed with the rituals, could become the priest. The Court cited a 1966 judgement which had said, ''Hinduism is far more than a mere form of theism resting on Brahminism.'' The Court referred to Article 17 of the Constitution which abolishes ''untouchability'' and quoted revelations made in the Bhagavat Gita and the dream of the Father of the Nation Mahatma Gandhi that ''all distinctions based on castes and creed must be abolished and man must be known and recognised by his action, irrespective of the caste to which he may, on account of his birth, belong.'' Dealing with the importance of daily rituals, 'pujas' and recitations to maintain the sanctity of the idols, the bench said, ''no doubt only a qualified person, well-versed and properly trained for the purposes alone, can perform pujas in the temple since he has not only to enter the sanctum sanctorum but also touch the idol installed there.'' The Court said if traditionally or conventionally in any temple all along a Brahmin alone was conducting 'pujas' or performing the job of a priest, it may not be because a person other than the Brahmin was prohibited from doing so. UNI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.