j & k

[Guest guest]

Distressing signs from J&Khttp://www.rediff.com/news/2002/oct/30arvind.htmThe

Kashmir Vale has won yet again. And Jammu remains jinxed as always. The

Congress giving away the J&K chief ministerial post to Anantnag-based Peoples

Democratic Party, despite being favoured by the arithmetic of the results of

the assembly election, is a baffling decision. It's a decision that is likely

to lead to consequences other than merely intensifying the movement for a

separate Jammu state, which formed part of the RSS demand for J&K's

trifurcation in June this year. The initial discontent reported in the Congress

party's Jammu camp against Sonia Gandhi's so-called sacrifice and so-called

statesmanship seems a sign of things to come. If the Sangh can weave this

discontent into something tangible, Mufti Mohammad Sayeed's coalition

government could soon have trouble on its hands, what with its common minimum

programme having enough to attract the wrath of the 28-member National

Conference that would be only too happy to tease and torment the coalition

every step of its way. Let it be stated straightaway that the demand for a

separate Jammu state by the RSS in June this year was not really a new demand.

It can be traced to the late forties and early fifties when the Praja Parishad

party in J&K resented the fact that the Indian Constitution was not applicable

in its entirety to J&K because of the wishes of the National Conference's

Sheikh Abdullah aided by Jawaharlal Nehru's inexplicable blind support to him.

The resentment had begun when none of the four members from J&K, nominated on

India's Constituent Assembly by the state's yuvraj (crown prince) on the advice

of Sheikh Abdullah, was from Jammu. Further, the Praja Parishad was insistent

that Jammu and Ladakh had wanted full integration with the Dominion of India

without Article 370. In a public speech in Kanpur on December 29, 1952, Dr

Shyama Prasad Mookerjee, president of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh (precursor of

the Bharatiya Janata Party) had said: "If Sheikh Abdullah is adamant, Jammu and

Ladakh must not be sacrificed, but the Kashmir Valley may be a separate state

within the Indian Union receiving all necessary subventions and being created

constitutionally in such manner as Sheikh Abdullah and his advisers may wish

for." It was not to be. And so, for 50 years, Jammu has had fewer seats than

the valley in the J&K assembly though in terms of land area and number of

voters it has warranted the same number as, if not more than, the valley. (In

the latest election, Jammu had 37 seats, Ladakh four, and the valley, 46).

Jammu has suffered in other spheres of the state as well: allocation of

financial aid, education facilities, and employment in government. With the

PDP's 16 MLAs being all from the valley, it can hardly be expected to have a

soft corner for Jammu, or Ladakh for that matter, especially when the Mufti is

on record that the PDP deserved the CM's post because the various problems of

the state emanate from the valley. The new coalition's multi-point common

minimum programme is in keeping with that hypothesis, its reference to equal

treatment for all three major regions of the state being so casual as to arouse

doubts about sincerity in that direction. The most serious drawback of this CMP

is its over-emphasis on political aspects to the almost total neglect of the

need for the state's economic resurgence and the urgency to root out the

widespread corruption --- the two evils that had characterised the Abdullah

government. These two evils had been clearly revealed in the pre-election press

reports from various parts of the state (Now for some governance please. But the

PDP doesn't seem to have read those reports. It has, instead, chosen largely to

mollify the militants in the state and pass it off as "the healing touch".

Scrapping the applicability of POTA in the state, release of detainees after

"screening", finishing off the Special Operations Group of the state police,

increasing the aid to families of slain terrorists by another Rs 100,000,

making the state take over the education of militants' children --- these are

measures, really, that constitute a reward for terrorism. Similarly, this

policy intention to talk to various groups in the state, including militants

and the Hurriyat Conference, is totally irrelevant as a solution of the state's

adversaries. Just what will these talks achieve? If, for instance, the Hurriyat

reiterates its demand for a plebiscite, what does Mufti Mohammad Sayeed do

about it? Will he endorse that demand? Will he expect the Government of India

to act on it? Clearly, the Mufti has, at best, a foggy idea of what the

problems of a state called J&K are, of what the solutions are to those

problems. The MORI poll of some months ago and the very recent Asian

Age-Nielsen poll have not had any impact on his thinking. He still seems to

nurture the belief that most of the J&K people, rather than a minuscule

minority, want to secede from the Union of India and are therefore the cause of

the turmoil in the state. And that what the Kashmir valley wants is what the

rest of the state wants. Sad. Sadder still is why the Congress has agreed to

all this as the platform for governance. Sonia Gandhi had more than once

lambasted the NDA government that it had no Kashmir policy. Now, having got the

chance to show its mettle, she has instead revealed that she too has no policy

on the subject. It's either that or an enactment of the saying that "discretion

is the better part of valour". By taking the rear seat and instead allowing the

PDP to occupy the hot seat, and by riding along with the core of the PDP's poll

agenda, Sonia Gandhi has chosen the "heads I win, tails you lose" formula. If

the PDP fails in its allotted first use of the batting crease in Srinagar, the

Congress can always claim to have been only the non-striker. And if, by chance,

it succeeds in whatever it is trying to achieve, the Congress can share the

hurrah to boast about when the 2004 general elections come. It's a dangerous

game either way, which the Congress president has chosen to play with the

people of Jammu, with those of Ladakh, and with all those in the whole of Jammu

& Kashmir, including the thousands of Kashmiri Pandits who're no longer in that

state. Tailpiece: The missus says that that only reason why Madam didn't choose

to bat first in the J&K Test was because she wanted to punish Ghulam Nabi Azad

for strutting about in the two weeks after V-Day as though he were Virendra

Sehwag. Considering her past, that's not an entirely implausible theory, is it?

Sonia analysts are free to give us a final take on that.

Discover your Indian Roots at - http://www.esamskriti.comLong Live Sanathan /

Kshatriya Dharam. Become an Intellectual KshatriyaGenerate Positive Vibrations

lifelong worldwide.Aap ka din mangalmaya rahe or Shubh dinam astu or Have a

Nice DayUnity preceedes Strength Synchronize your efforts, avoid

duplication.THINK, ACT, INFLUENCE, to Un write back.Create Positive

Karmas by being Focussed, controlling senses, will power & determinationNever

boasts about yr victory and successKnowledge, Wealth, Happiness are meant to be

sharedBe Open Minded, pick up what yu like from the worldBe Thick skinned,

internalize criticism, do what yu think is rightLet not the power of your enemy

deter yu, fortitude is what the Geeta teachesStop cribbing, ACTION is what the

Indian scriptures talk aboutTake the battle into the enemy camp, SET THE

AGENDA, be proactiveIn an argument, no emotions, be detached, get yr facts

right, then attack with the precision of a missile