Unveiled:United States of Europe

[Guest guest]

GOOD NOW EUROPE SHOULD ONLY GET ONE SEAT AT THE UN OR ALLOW THE USA

TO GET 50 MORE SEATS TO REPRESENT ITS VARIOUS STATES.iNDIA SHOULD GET

THE SAME PREVILEDGE.VRIN

 

 

Unveiled: the blueprint for United States of Europe

By Stephen Castle in Brussels

29 October 2002

Internal links

 

Unveiled: the blueprint for United States of Europe

 

Chirac and Blair had stand-up row at summit

 

Sweden set to vote on joining euro next autumn

 

PM ends reshuffle with jobs for euro backers

 

Leading article: A step in the right direction, but the future of

Europe needs bigger thinking

 

John Lichfield on Chirac: bad for Europe, good for the US

The blueprint for a new constitution for Europe, unveiled yesterday,

paves the way for sweeping changes to the EU but provoked instant

British opposition by suggesting the bloc could be renamed "United

States of Europe".

 

Published by Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, the former French president

who is chairing an inquiry into the future of Europe, the document

raises the prospect of a massive overhaul of the EU to accommodate up

to 10 new countries due to join in 2004. It lists three possible

titles besides the European Union. They are: European Community, the

United States of Europe, and United Europe.

 

The outline document also suggests that all Europeans should be given

the right to citizenship of the EU as well as their member states.

 

However, Peter Hain, the Welsh Secretary and the Government's

representative on the convention, told BBC's Newsnight programme last

night that the idea of a United States of Europe was "a non-runner",

and that dual citizenship was "not something we would go along with".

 

British officials believe the name-change suggestion is tactical.

Designed to please Euro-federalists, it has been touted "safe in the

knowledge that it will be shot down".

 

These objections apart, the Government believes that Mr Giscard's

text would open the way for many changes that would entrench the

power of nation states.

 

The blueprint carefully leaves the most sensitive decisions for

later. It has been billed as a "skeleton" constitution because it

only sets out a framework, listing 46 articles and going into little

detail. But changes that could be ushered in include the creation of

a powerful new president of the EU who would report to national

leaders, a congress of national and European parliamentarians, and an

exit clause to allow countries to quit the EU.

 

The text outlines plans to give the EU the legal power to sign

treaties and sit on international bodies but also says any

competence "not conferred on the Union by the constitution rests with

the member state". There is only one reference to powers being

exercised on a "federal basis"and that is not seen as a threat by

British officials.

 

Dual citizenship would confer rights including free movement,

residence, voting powers and freedom to stand as a candidate in local

elections and elections to the European Parliament.

 

Mr Giscard's convention of 105 national and European parliamentarians

is drawing up a draft constitution that is to be recommended to EU

heads of government next year. They alone can decide on a new treaty.

 

Part of the group's job is to simplify Europe's byzantine structures.

One element of this is the fusion of the two treaties that set in

place two entities: the European Community and the European Union.

That process leaves open the possibility of a name change and Mr

Giscard has made clear his preference for "United Europe".

 

Publication of the document marks the beginning of a battle over the

all-important detail. The text prompted mixed reactions from the

British political parties represented on the convention. Linda

McAvan, a Labour Member of the European Parliament, said: "The Euro-

realists are winning ... Giscard has struck a good balance."

 

But David Heathcoat-Amory, a Conservative Eurosceptic, said: "The

draft constitution published today would endow the EU with all the

attributes of a state ... The British Government must make clear its

total opposition to this federal advance."

 

Andrew Duff, a Liberal Democrat member of the convention, said the

document "clearly rejects the reactionary approach chosen by the UK

Government" and "allows for a radical refoundation" of the union.

 

THE MAIN POINTS

 

• European Community/ European Union/United States of Europe/United

Europe would be created.

 

• Its objectives would include economic and social cohesion,

protection of common values, high employment, liberty, security and

justice, foreign policy.

 

• The union would have "legal personality", with the power to sign

treaties and take a seat on international bodies such as the United

Nations.

 

• Union citizenship would be established and defined, giving rights

of free movement, residence and voting in the union and diplomatic

protection in other countries.

 

• An "exit clause" would allow countries to withdraw voluntarily from

the union.