kids gloves

[Guest guest]

The kid gloves need to be taken off http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/feb/04ram.htm

February 04, 2003

 

Ramananda Sengupta

 

Way back in 1992, I was visiting my brother who ran a farm in North

Dinajpur, a district in West Bengal which borders Bangladesh.

 

While strolling one afternoon along a riverbank which formed the

Indian side of the border, I came across hectic activity near a small

jetty.

 

A battered boat with a family on board had just docked on the Indian

side. Greeting them was a young man with a bunch of papers in his

hand.

 

"What's your name? Age?" he barked at the bearded man alighting from

the dinghy with a few tins, a bundle of bedding and clothes. His

wife, two young sons and a daughter were still in the boat.

 

"Mohammad Ghafoor," came the tentative reply.

 

The young man scribbled the name and some other details on a blank

ration card, and pointed towards a group of tall trees about a

kilometer away. "See that tree? A square quarter acre near that is

yours. Make sure you know who to vote for."

 

I waited till the Bangladeshi family -- with a disbelieving, yet

hopeful gleam in their eyes -- trudged off towards the horizon before

accosting the man with ration cards.

 

My queries surprised him.

 

"Why?" he asked innocently. "Don't you know the local elections are

due soon?"

 

Further talk over a cup of steaming syrupy tea revealed that Manoj

was a card-carrying Leftist, and just before every local election, he

and hundreds others like him were given 'quotas' of people guaranteed

to vote for the ruling Left Front in West Bengal. He was allotted a

few acres of land which he would distribute among people who came

across the border.

 

In fact, he claimed the Bangladesh Rifles, or BDR, across the border

actually auctioned seats on the boats crossing the river.

However,"these ungrateful wretches might vote for us the first

time... but most of them disappear soon afterwards."

 

Disappear?

 

"You know, Bombay, Calcutta, Delhi, wherever... a ration card becomes

their passport. And I have to get fresh lots with every election,"

grumbled Manoj.

 

Tales of largescale migration from Bangladesh into India are not new.

 

Since 1964, nearly a decade before the birth of Bangladesh, hordes of

tribal Chakmas, who are predominantly Buddhist, have been fleeing the

Chittagong Hill Tracts into Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh and Assam

following persecution by Muslim leaders who wanted their land.

 

Then there are the Hindus and other minorities whose numbers, apart

from a brief spell when Sheikh Hasina Wajed was in power, have shown

a dramatic decline since the creation of Bangladesh in 1971.

 

Wounded and persecuted, most of them arrive in India and are

assimilated without much fuss. As are the young Bangladeshi girls

lured into brothels in India.

 

And then, of course, there are the economically deprived

Bangladeshis, who dream of the grass being greener in India.

 

Of course, Indian government estimates of over 20 million illegal

Bangladeshis in India are patently absurd; it even includes the

exodus during and just after the 1971 war of liberation.

 

But the Bangladesh government's assertion that there are no

Bangladeshis living illegally in India is even more absurd.

 

Yet so far -- apart from the occasional purge of a few hundred

obviously illegal immigrants initiated in a few states, some as far

away as Maharashtra -- India has been a bit complacent, perhaps even

guilty of actually encouraging such migration.

 

Despite the fact that the alarmingly porous 4,096 kilometer-long

border also allowed separatist leaders in the Northeast to train and

set up camps in Bangladesh forests, with or without Dhaka's

connivance.

 

Despite the fact that Dhaka's intelligence agencies have had overt

and covert links with their counterparts in Pakistan, the ISI, since

Bangladesh's formation in 1971.

 

Despite the gruesome pictures of dead Indian jawans tied up like

animals on a stick being carted by Bangladesh Rifles Personnel after

a border clash in April 2001 in Boraibari, Assam.

 

India, in fact, has been generous to a fault. In 1996, it signed the

Indo-Bangladesh water treaty, thereby diluting the tremendous

leverage it had by virtue of being able to flood or dry up Bangladesh

at will through the Farakka barrage, which controls the flow of the

mighty Ganges into Bangladesh.

 

This treaty, if strictly enforced, could actually silt up Kolkata

port during the dry months.

 

Enter a wily commando who now rules Pakistan.

 

General Pervez Musharraf must have been very happy indeed to visit

Dhaka last August and tender a rather tentative apology for the

atrocities committed by Pakistani soldiers during the 1971 war.

 

For in return, he was surely guaranteed that the government of

Khaleda Zia and her fundamentalist allies, who came to power on an

anti-India plank in December 2001, would continue to needle India on

the western front.

 

Barely three months later, Indian External Affairs Minister Yashwant

Sinha claimed the Pakistani high commission in Dhaka has become

a 'nerve centre' of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence

operations against India.

 

'Some Al Qaeda elements have taken shelter in Bangladesh... the

foreign media has reported several such instances and our own sources

have confirmed many of these reports,' he told the Lok Sabha.

 

Now, there is a tense standoff on the border again, with both sides

having declared a red alert to prevent 'infiltration.' A group of

Bengali snake charmers and their pets stranded in no-man's land are

the latest pawns in the game of push and shove.

 

These snake charmers reportedly told the BSF they were legitimate

voters in Bangladesh and were even willing to produce identification

documents if they allowed to return home. They claimed they had

accidentally crossed over into the Indian side while crossing a

Bangladeshi village called Kankramari in Lalmonirhat district. They

were intercepted by the BSF and asked to return, but the Bangladesh

Rifles refused, saying they were of Indian origin.

 

Dhaka accuses the 'fundamentalist, Hindu nationalist' Indian

government of trying to force trainloads of Indians (read Bengali

Muslims) into Bangladesh for political reasons.

 

'There were so far 30 attempts of push-in of Bengali speaking Indian

nationals into Bangladesh during the last few days,' says Foreign

Secretary Shamsher Mobin Chowdhry about the latest developments,

asserting that foreign diplomats might be asked to verify the

situation for themselves.

 

But the question that needs to be asked is, do the BJP and its

saffron allies really believe they will score electoral brownie

points by evicting Indian nationals? Unlike in Bangladesh, the

Opposition in India would have a field day if it could prove that a

single Indian national was being deported. And there would certainly

be riots in West Bengal.

 

So far, aware of the fact that our smaller neighbours see India

through a prism of fear and suspicion -- so cleverly capitalised by

Khaleda Zia during her election campaign -- New Delhi has been going

out of its way to handle bilateral problems discreetly. But the kid

gloves need to be taken off now.

 

Dhaka needs to be clearly warned that the cost of hosting the ISI and

other anti-Indian elements will cost it dearly. Private hints at the

possibility of totally reneging on the water treaty and possible

economic sanctions ought to serve the purpose, though it is also

likely to foster further anti-India feelings.

 

To offset this, India should publicly offer a deadline to resolve the

border dispute. Only a 6.5 km stretch near Coomila in Bangladesh

adjoining Tripura is actually undemarcated, but the main issue is

that of the enclaves, or Chits. These enclaves are known as chits

because the Rajas of the two erstwhile princely states of Cooch Behar

(now in North Bengal) and Rongpur (now in Bangladesh) regularly

staked portions of their land on a game of cards, and the paper

ceding such land were known as chits.

 

There are 111 Indian Chits in Bangladesh territory covering some

17,000 odd acres and 51 Bangladesh enclaves covering 7,083 acres in

Indian territory. Sixty five of these disputed enclaves, (35 Indian

and 31 Bangladeshi) are along the West Bengal-Bangladesh border.

 

Resolving this dispute in a manner that seems favourable to Dhaka

(without being obviously condescending) could certainly help

dissipate some of the anti-India sentiment now bubbling over in

Bangladesh.

 

Third, and most important, we need to warn, and if necessary take

action against, political parties in Bengal and other Northeastern

states which encourage immigrants as vote banks.

 

For even if he is ordered to ask every boatload that comes across

whether there are any ISI or Al Qaeda agents on board, poor Manoj can

hardly expect a truthful reply.

 

Discover your Indian Roots at - http://www.esamskriti.comTo mail -

exploreindia (AT) vsnl (DOT) net.Long Live Sanatan / Kshatriya Dharam. Become an

Intellectual KshatriyaGenerate Positive Vibrations lifelong worldwide.Aap ka

din mangalmaya rahe or Shubh dinam astu or Have a Nice DayUnity preceedes

Strength Synchronize your efforts, avoid duplication.THINK, ACT, INFLUENCE, to

Un write back.Create Positive Karmas by being Focussed, controlling

senses, will power & determinationNever boasts about yr victory and

successKnowledge, Wealth, Happiness are meant to be sharedBe Open Minded, pick

up what yu like from the world

 

Stop cribbing, ACTION is what the Indian scriptures talk aboutTake the battle

into the enemy camp, SET THE AGENDA, be proactiveIn an argument, no emotions,

be detached, get yr facts right, then attack with the precision of a missile